Shelter’s Income and expenditure figures highlighted13:57 PM, 4th February 2019
About 2 weeks ago 35
If you are already aware of the problem and can’t be bothered to read this entire article please feel free to skip to the bottom to read our “plan of action”.
It is all very well that media are recognising the Government experiment to introduce the 3% Stamp Duty levy on second homes is failing but that’s just part of the story.
Osborne’s Stamp Duty levy has resulted in less duty being collected which might put pressure on Hammond to reconsider that.
The backlash from industry bodies such as RICS, conveyancers, estate agents etc. is all helping to make the case against the Stamp Duty levy but from my perspective it’s all too short sighted.
The organisations calling for a reversal of the Stamp Duty levy are only doing so because that’s what is affecting their business today. The real problem is going to be the increasing number of people who will find themselves homeless as other tax measures begin to bite.
Let’s pretend the Stamp Duty issue is resolved and that investors start piling into the market again. Those affected today might see this as a win, HM treasury will certainly be happy if Stamp Duty receipts increase again and in the short term there will no doubt be celebration.
The new investors will enter the market with their eyes wide open and many intent on building property portfolios will do so in a Limited Company. Let’s face it, they be daft not to, especially if they intend to borrow money! After all, why would any business elect to invest in a structure which prevents them from offsetting finance costs against income? It’s pure madness, no other business except for private landlords is taxed on the basis that finance costs are excluded as expenses.
The hole in the bucket
If the Stamp Duty issue is fixed then investment into UK property will undoubtedly rise. However, hundreds of thousand of landlords who committed to investment before April 2015, when George Osborne first announced the restrictions on finance cost relief, will remain trapped into an ownership structure which is no longer viable. There may only be a few hundred thousand landlords affected but between them they own at well over one million properties.
As the bucket fills with new investors, unaffected by George Osborne’s tax policies, the number of properties owned by private landlords will reduce. To put it another way, those affected by George’s policies will sell up, hence the “hole in the bucket”.
Why is it that Government refuse to recognise this problem?
A headline in The Guardian today reads “UK faces shortfall of 1.8m rental homes”
Err …. #ToldYouSo!
This is what happens when a Conservative Chancellor with a history Degree implements tax policy on private rental housing devised for the Green Party by a Geography graduate who just happens to have a posh Daddy.
On a more local level we are seeing headlines “MPs in dispute over £1 million Travelodge bill for homeless families”
What a mess, and to think that Shelter fully supports the legislation that is causing this.
Why is it that Shelter, one of the biggest charities supposedly fighting homelessness cannot see beyond their noses?
A cynic might suggest that Shelter are nothing without a homelessness problem and landlords to attack!
The numbers of evictions will rocket when the new landlord tax regime kicks in. God help anyone claiming benefits to pay their rent. Benefits caps and Universal Credit isn’t helping help either. Private landlords will not be able to afford to continue renting to benefits claimants. Instead they will do what most Housing Associations are doing and rent to working folk. They will also end tenancies which are no longer profitable.
Does anybody have any idea where the most vulnerable in society will live? Councils are already using Travel Lodge for emergency housing because they have nowhere else to put people!
Does anybody really think Government Housing Policy makes any sense at all?
We want to communicate with every high level housing officer and centre of influence in local Government.
Because the homelessness problem is going to end up on their doorstep. It is the local council who are going to be responsible for the clean up operation when the Government war on landlords (read indirect stealth tax on tenants) takes full effect.
Ever since the Summer 2015 Budget a team of 14 academics, all regular contributors to the Property118 forum, have committed their spare time to researching the consequences of George Osborne’s tax policies on the Private Rented Sector. The vast majority of the research provided to “Axe The Tenant Tax” campaign has been presented by this group.
Dr Rosalind Beck head up this research campaign and the members of Property118 have pulled it all together into a substantial report.
Our goal is to have this published and sent to every local Government officer with influence over housing policy. Educating those people is another route to putting further pressure on Government to re-think consequences of the tax policies introduced by George Osborne.
To achieve this we need to raise funds.
The more money we raise, the more we can do.
We trust we can rely on your support?
Please Log-In OR Become a member to reply to comments or subscribe to new comment notifications.
Our mission is to facilitate the sharing of best practice amongst UK landlords, tenants and letting agentsLearn More