Portfolio Landlords Action Network open letter to Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook – Fairness for Landlords and Tenants

Portfolio Landlords Action Network open letter to Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook – Fairness for Landlords and Tenants

9:38 AM, 5th September 2024, About A year ago 21

Text Size

Categories:

Landlords are calling on the housing minister “to level the playing field for landlords and tenants”.

In an open letter to Matthew Pennycook the Portfolio Landlords Action Network group demands the housing minister support landlords rather than “demonise them”.

Portfolio Landlords Action Network (PLAN) is an informal network of Landlords with 75 Properties or more. Their largest member has over 1,500.

PLAN is a small group of large portfolio landlords who cannot walk away from the PRS no matter what reforms are passed. The network does not want to walk away because they believe in the value of the PRS.

Fair playing field for both Landlords and Tenants

Marcus Selmon, Chair of Portfolio Landlords Action Group, comments:

“What we want is a fair playing field for both Landlords and Tenants and a constructive dialogue with the Government and other stakeholders to come up with a new PLAN for the Private Rented Sector. A PLAN that includes us.

“To assist in that process we have written an Open Letter to the Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook. A letter that we want to circulate widely to the various stakeholders in this debate so that we can start a constructive process of engagement with the Government.

“We now set out that letter below.

“If you want to support our aim of engaging with the Minister please feel free to circulate or contact me in the comments below about how you could do that.”

Open letter to Matthew Pennycook

Dear Minister,

I would like to congratulate you on your appointment to this crucial role. I am writing to you on behalf of PLAN, a group of private non-institutional portfolio housing providers. Collectively we develop, own and manage over 10,000 private homes, larger than many Housing Associations.

Like the Government, we actively want and need, for all concerned, to provide good quality, appropriate, flexible, safe dwellings for those that we house. We are committed to working with the Government to build a healthy and thriving private rented sector.  We support your aims for rogue landlords to be driven out and wish that the myriad laws that already exist were enforced properly before introducing another raft.

We would welcome the opening of a dialogue around:

  • Sensible grounds for possession whilst providing security of tenure
  • Energy efficiency and carbon footprints
  • Access to funding for improvement of existing homes
  • Methods to ensure tenants, where desired, have access to buy existing rentals without any of the stakeholders losing out
  • Taxation in the sector and the incidence on all stakeholders

The private rental sector, as a whole, provides housing to millions of people. We understand that we are a crucial part of that system, with roles and responsibilities that can make a real difference to our tenants’ wellbeing.

We believe we can offer insights to you and your colleagues at the Department into the wider context of today’s housing market through our knowledge and experience of developing and managing the full range of short, medium and long-term privately rented properties.

The sector is under pressure, not only from the impact of inflation, interest rate increases and huge increases in costs of labour and materials (construction inflation up 40% compared to Consumer Price Index increase of 25% since 2020), but also from the previous Government’s policies, particularly on taxation.  The changes in legislation mean it is highly possible that landlords can be running an unprofitable business and yet still be liable for taxation on “profits” that don’t exist.

The result has been that many private housing providers have left and continue to leave the sector.  Hamptons International points to 163,000 rental properties disappearing from the market between 2019 and the end of 2023. By driving private landlords out of the sector, the most vulnerable in society are worse off and all renters have less options rather than more.  This in turn puts increased pressure and cost on local authorities who have a responsibility to house residents.

The ideas around planning reform, housing target reintroduction, green/grey belt and social and affordable housing all make sense, but all have their own challenges in delivery.  No one wants a sector where tenants are becoming worse off, where rents take a higher share of household income/disposable income or where families have to live in temporary and expensive short-term accommodation.  What’s needed is supply growth and stability.

The Private Rental Sector is a business and will remain so – we believe the Government wants that. So we believe it is wrong to demonise Landlords in the way some groups do. Because the  Private Rental Sector delivers significantly higher satisfaction levels than social landlords (82% vs 74% in the 22/23 English Housing Survey). But many Landlords only have one or two properties and so have a choice if they are put under too much pressure; many are voting with their feet, and retiring from the sector, and moving to passive investments. This is bad timing as it further reduces the available number of rental properties at a time of rising demand. That can only be bad for Tenants

What we consider is needed is a positive vision for Landlords going forward that shows support for the right type of Landlord as approved by the Government. They can then play their part in finding solutions to the current rental crisis.

To do that we believe it is essential to work collaboratively with the Government to develop a solution to the housing issues the country is currently facing.  We have considerable expertise, insights, ideas and solutions that would benefit everyone and enable you to meet Labour’s election manifesto. That is why we are reaching out to you in the hope you will meet with us so we can give our vision of a PRS that works for everyone.

Please can you let me know your availability for an initial conversation to discuss these urgent matters – ideally, prior to Party conference season.

Please note this letter has been signed by a variety of members of  PLAN and the PRS who support what we are proposing namely a dialogue with the Government on these matters

Yours sincerely

Marcus Selmon Chair of Portfolio Landlords Action Network

Marcus SelmonChair

Portfolio Landlords Action Network ( P.L.A.N)


Share This Article


Comments

Avatar

Adam Lawrence

Read Full Bio

You're Missing Out!

Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds

or if your already a member

Login with

or

Member Since December 2013 - Comments: 59 - Articles: 12

12:50 PM, 5th September 2024, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by david porter at 05/09/2024 – 12:49
Believe me David I have detailed experience of that

Avatar

david porter

Read Full Bio

You're Missing Out!

Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds

or if your already a member

Login with

or

Member Since January 2016 - Comments: 296 - Articles: 1

12:52 PM, 5th September 2024, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Gromit at 05/09/2024 – 10:29
Big corporate landlords may make donations- but the small landlord has a vote!

Avatar

Adam Lawrence

Read Full Bio

You're Missing Out!

Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds

or if your already a member

Login with

or

Member Since December 2013 - Comments: 59 - Articles: 12

13:03 PM, 5th September 2024, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by david porter at 05/09/2024 – 12:52
Again I very much agree with those sentiments David!

Avatar

Gromit

You're Missing Out!

Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds

or if your already a member

Login with

or

Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 1010

13:08 PM, 5th September 2024, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Adam Lawrence at 05/09/2024 – 13:03
But ….
1. there are very many more tenants than landlords, and tenants don’t realise that they foot the bill eventually.
2. big corporates want less competition from small landlords.so that they can increase rents and make more profit.

Avatar

Caroline Newman

You're Missing Out!

Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds

or if your already a member

Login with

or

Member Since February 2020 - Comments: 20

13:25 PM, 5th September 2024, About A year ago

As a letting agent I am grateful to you for the effort made here – thank you and I will share with my landlords. Surprisingly for us the number of landlords selling has dropped dramatically due to the increase in rent they can now achieve.

I have lost count how many Housing Ministers we have gone through in the last 10 years – its a joke.

Dont even get me started on the Tenant Fee Ban – huge own goal for government.

Avatar

Derek And jen

You're Missing Out!

Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds

or if your already a member

Login with

or

Member Since December 2020 - Comments: 12

14:08 PM, 5th September 2024, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 04/09/2024 – 18:29Interesting
what would you propose when stamp duty is running 60 to 100k for a property ?

Avatar

Adam Lawrence

Read Full Bio

You're Missing Out!

Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds

or if your already a member

Login with

or

Member Since December 2013 - Comments: 59 - Articles: 12

14:30 PM, 5th September 2024, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Gromit at 05/09/2024 – 13:08
True BUT what about the actual voting that goes on – it might be closer than you think at 1.95 properties per landlord on average or whatever it is. 40% didn’t vote last time out….

2 – is absolutely the institutional view, totally

Avatar

PAUL BARTLETT

You're Missing Out!

Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds

or if your already a member

Login with

or

Member Since May 2023 - Comments: 191

23:06 PM, 5th September 2024, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Adam Lawrence at 05/09/2024 – 11:50
“I’d suspect that the inventory on checkin, inspection reports etc. would be the realistic defence against that sort of thing”

In practice, not at all because 5 weeks rent deposit is much less than the damage costs to repair.

TDS have no idea what repairs actually cost..Because they don’t accept any appeal with the facts the deposit system is very broken.

Avatar

JamesB

You're Missing Out!

Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds

or if your already a member

Login with

or

Member Since April 2022 - Comments: 124

8:36 AM, 6th September 2024, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 04/09/2024 – 18:29“??????? ?? ?????? ???????, ????? ???????, ???? ?????? ?? ??? ???????? ??????? ??????? ??? ?? ??? ???????????? ?????? ???
I’d need 103% of market value plus £2,000. This would cover the cost of replacing the property in my portfolio (stamp duty and legal fees).”
Don’t forget the CGT (at goodness know what future rate) which will need to be paid within 30 days as there is no form of rollover relief, and possible penalties for repaying a mortgage early,
Stamp duty is more than 3%, us landlords just get the pleasure of an extra 3% on top of already high stamp duty.
Months of lost rental income?
Replacing all appliances that presumably you are unlikely to rip out from your existing tenant’s buy to let, or be able to charge them full replacement value for.
The list goes on. A BTL property is very expensive to set up and only works as a long term investrment. There would be no realistic way of making this fair on a landlord who didn’t happen to want to be closing out at the same time anyway. (I say that having sold a 4 bed semi in London to the the tenants but only because I can’t exist the PRS quickly enough).

Avatar

Lee

Read Full Bio

You're Missing Out!

Members can reply to discussions, connect with experienced landlords, and access full member profiles showing years of expertise. Don't stay on the sidelines - join the UK's most active landlord community today.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds

or if your already a member

Login with

or

Member Since October 2021 - Comments: 5

9:52 AM, 6th September 2024, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by Adam Lawrence at 05/09/2024 – 11:53
Hi Adam, Good points but I still think it’s opening a can of worms to even suggest a right to buy. I would say private ownership and capitalism are the foundations of civilisation and to suggest forced selling might be okay is going down a really slippery path. Government intervention in a free market – I can’t think of an example where it didn’t distort the market and cause worse problems down the line. Any of my tenants are welcome to buy any of my houses they just need to offer me a price I can’t refuse. I see this aspect of this PLAN letter to be really sinister at worst and crazy at best. It’s as if the entrepreneurs/capitalists decided the Soviet Union was a better fit than the USA.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or