9 months ago | 44 comments
As Ronan Keating once said: “You say it best, when you say nothing at all”, Angela’s appearance in front of a friendly Parliamentary committee was an education in how much the government’s housing experts really don’t know about the sector.
A year in the job, and at least two years of slagging off landlords, and she is still none the wiser.
Anyone would think that she really doesn’t want to learn how to deliver housing at scale for private tenants.
Which is good because she’s failing on every level – and Westminster whispers suggest she could become Prime Minister in the next year or so.
May the Lord help us because here’s someone who has clearly been over promoted and has no discernible talent for what she is paid to do.
I say this because Property118 reported Angela’s appearance and even included a video to show the world of her brilliance.
She rejected calls to unfreeze the Local Housing Allowance (LHA), arguing that increasing LHA rates would primarily benefit private landlords.
Say what, now?
Angela then had the temerity to accuse landlords of evicting tenants without a reason so they could be replaced with tenants paying more, exacerbating housing issues.
Fortunately, we had committee chair Florence Eshalomi to challenge Ange, noting that the LHA freeze is pushing families into poverty and questioning whether the government is reviewing the policy.
Crikey! So, there is a Labour MP who understands the issues.
Our Angela isn’t open to a debate and neatly sidestepped the question, emphasising the government’s £34 billion annual housing support, including £12 billion for the private rented sector.
She also stressed the need for a ‘social housing revolution’ through the Affordable Homes Programme – though she didn’t say that most of those homes will be for people who have just turned up in the country.
Angela and her civil servants must see that refusing to unfreeze LHA rates is a policy blunder that punishes tenants and misunderstands landlords’ realities.
By dismissing calls to adjust LHA, Ange claims she’s preventing landlords from pocketing public funds – if only life was that simple!
We aren’t pocketing anything, we are offering a service and want to be paid, hopefully at a market rate, for it.
Labour’s stance ignores the housing crisis’s complexity and harms the very tenants she aims to protect.
The LHA, meant to cover the bottom 30th percentile of market rents, hasn’t kept pace with inflation OR rising rents.
The gap between LHA and actual market rates is now so wide that landlords can’t afford to rent at LHA levels without effectively subsidising their tenants.
Many landlords don’t oppose renting to benefit-assisted tenants, especially since they tend to bring stability as long-term renters, but setting rents at LHA rates is unsustainable when costs like maintenance and mortgages soar.
Can we add in the cost of selective licensing since this nonsense also appears to be on the rise too?
Instead of vilifying landlords for evicting tenants under Section 8 for rent arrears, Angela should appreciate that the LHA shortfall forces tough decisions.
Unfreezing LHA would undoubtedly help reduce homelessness and save millions on temporary accommodation costs.
I’m sure there are lots of Labour councillors who can help explain the finer details on this issue – they are always moaning about running out of cash to house homeless families.
Or don’t Labour MPs listen to their frontline council colleagues?
It made me laugh during the election campaign that Angela said she could magically make a million homes for renting appear – not understanding it will take years for that to happen.
But she’s still at it with her ‘social housing revolution’ which still overlooks immediate needs.
Her ambitious and unachievable 1.5 million homes plan won’t come close to what we need if we keep accepting huge numbers of migrants.
I imagine the kicker for landlords working at this end of the market is news that the government has the cash to pay Serco inflated rents to house migrants who haven’t paid a penny into the country’s coffers.
But she is still happy, apparently, to neglect British people struggling with stagnant LHA rates.
This double standard will fuel frustration among landlords and tenants alike.
Angela’s blinkered policy risks driving more tenants into poverty and homelessness, while her rhetoric alienates landlords who could be part of the solution.
Labour’s apparent disdain for the private rented sector blinds them to the harm inflicted on vulnerable renters.
Unfreezing LHA isn’t just sensible; it is becoming more urgent by the day.
Until the Labour government addresses this, tenants will bear the brunt of a broken system, and landlords will be scapegoated for navigating it.
But don’t worry, Angela has dreams of a social housing utopia, where lots of tenants will be left out in the cold.
We don’t have the money or people to build the planned houses but that doesn’t matter.
So long as caring landlords wanting to house poor families are punished financially then Labour’s work is done. Just like they will be at the next General Election.
Until next time,
The Landlord Crusader
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Rightmove promises a revolution in tenant finding for landlordsNext Article
Is It Time to Change the Narrative?
9 months ago | 44 comments
10 months ago | 18 comments
10 months ago | 21 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3515 - Articles: 5
9:37 AM, 11th July 2025, About 9 months ago
ahhh but this is also based on the presumption that LL’s WILL be still actively wanting to take on benefit tenants…
Given the planned RRB and its myriad of rules and regulations where it’s going to be an even bigger risk to take on a benefit tenant than ever before, because of the way that UC rent element is paid out etc…then all this just adds to the reasons why to avoid offering benefit recipients a tenancy in the first place….
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3515 - Articles: 5
9:37 AM, 11th July 2025, About 9 months ago
so Ange, what the plan – you going to house them all yourself then? OK – be my guest!
Member Since May 2017 - Comments: 765
10:09 AM, 11th July 2025, About 9 months ago
I think she’s got a certificate in knitting
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 89
10:12 AM, 11th July 2025, About 9 months ago
I’ve got a one-bed flat let to the same guy for 8 years. He’s always claimed HB and passed it to me fortnightly.
[Sidenote…he was recently moved to UC and his payments stopped for 6 weeks. Crazy, but a short term problem that resolved itself in time.]
My issue is that the gap between HB and market rent has soared. HB is £847pcm and market rent is £1,100-1,200. And my mortgage repayments have trebled.
I was happy to subsidise a great tenant before, but now the gap is £3-4k a year and that’s too much. So his rent had to go up to help cover some of my increased costs and we agreed £1,000 pcm, still significantly below market rent.
I’m happy with that. But he is the one really losing out as he’s down by £153 a month.
How can Rayner not see that yes, landlords lose out with frozen HB (and we can vote with our feet if we want)…but the tenant is the real loser here?
Comments: 5
10:32 AM, 11th July 2025, About 9 months ago
Angela Rayner demonstrates that theory is when you have an idea and ideology is when an idea has you.
Member Since February 2020 - Comments: 360
10:38 AM, 11th July 2025, About 9 months ago
So landlords providing a service, are the parasites and shouldn’t receive any more funds.
But those receiving state funds on benefits providing nothing are the victims
We live in a topsy turvey world.
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1582
6:13 PM, 11th July 2025, About 9 months ago
It is essential that ALL private landlords increase ALL rents EVERY year.
I’d suggest we follow the social housing sector and aim Inflation (CPI) plus 1%. Of course, we will need to add on ant additional costs and risks that are newly imposed on the PRS. Of course, freezing LHA simply means that tenants need to find more money to pay the rent. It must be against discrimination laws to force disabled people to use benefits intended for other things to just keep a roof over their heads. Time to fight back.
Comments: 5
6:24 PM, 11th July 2025, About 9 months ago
I also think all licensing schemes should be audited. They are supposed to be not for profit, but, at the prices they are charging, I find that unbelievable.
We should get properly organised.
Member Since July 2023 - Comments: 14
9:40 AM, 12th July 2025, About 9 months ago
If she gets 1.5m built within the next two parliamentary terms I will run round Preston flag market naked… Just so happens she won’t get another term and I would also guess the good people of her parish will have her voted out too. Horrible person whose hypocrisy is only second to Starmers.
Member Since January 2022 - Comments: 267
2:58 PM, 12th July 2025, About 9 months ago
Can someone please advise me what 1.5m new homes actually means?
Is there a minimum space per home?
Is there a minimum number of bedrooms?
Is there a minimum EPC rating?
Is there quotas for what is required or is it a political number without any firm definition?