1 year ago | 42 comments
The way energy performance certificates (EPCs) are measured could be changed as soon as 2026.
The government has launched a consultation on proposed changes to the way EPCs are measured, which they claim will deliver a “more efficient and effective EPC system that works for landlords.”
The consultation is currently open and will run until February 26th
Under the current rules, EPCs are measured based on the amount of energy a property uses per square metre (e.g., for heating, lighting, etc.) and how much energy it loses (e.g., through poor insulation).
The energy assessor first calculates the property’s Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP) score, which is then used to determine the EPC rating.
However, the government proposes six potential metrics to calculate EPCs:
The consultation says: “These metrics together convey the key, complementary aspects of building energy performance, allowing the user to distinguish where the home performs more or less well. Supporting people to keep their energy bills low has always been a key purpose of EPCs and the energy cost metric will provide this information.”
The consultation also proposes requiring a valid EPC throughout the tenancy.
The consultation says: “Currently in both the private and social rental sectors when an EPC expires, a new EPC is only required when a property is re-let and not when the same tenant renews or extends their lease.
“The presence of a valid EPC throughout a tenancy, rather than solely at point of marketing, would ensure landlords and tenants are equipped with accurate and up-to-date information.”
At present an EPC is valid for 10 years, however, the government is considering changes to this rule.
The consultation says: “We are proposing to introduce for private rental properties a new trigger point where an EPC is required for when the current one expires.
“As the Energy Efficiency (Private Rented Property) (England and Wales) Regulations (2015) only applies to private sector properties which are required, or are part of a building which is required, to have a valid EPC, these types of properties (where the EPC has expired, and the same tenant remains in situ) are not covered by the PRS Regulations.
“Requiring a new EPC for rented buildings when the existing one expires would therefore ensure most new lease renewals are captured within the scope of the PRS Regulations.”
For HMOs, the government is considering expanding EPC requirements.
The consultation says: “We are proposing to extend the scope of EPCs so that a valid one is required for an entire house in multiple occupation (HMO) when a single room within it is rented out, as currently the guidance states that an EPC is not required in this instance, only when the whole house is rented out.
“Mandating EPCs for HMOs when a single room is rented out will ensure that HMOs will need to comply with the requirements set out in the MEES Regulations if they did not have a valid EPC before this point.
“This would provide consistency across the private rented sector. As a result, we are proposing a 24-month transitional period for any HMO landlords newly brought into the scope of the regulations to obtain a valid EPC.”
Property118 will be doing a series of articles on the proposed changes to how EPCs are measured and how they will affect landlords.
Landlords can fill out the consultation here and landlords can read the full list of proposals here
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
1 year ago | 42 comments
1 year ago | 20 comments
1 year ago | 115 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2021
12:24 PM, 15th February 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Martin R at 15/02/2025 – 11:12
EPC renewal is nothing like the landlord’s gas safety certificate or about EICR’s. Those certificates are about safety.
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 12
9:26 AM, 16th February 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 15/02/2025 – 12:24
Perhaps if we as landlords start to think of the EPC as Tennant safety ,things will change for the better.
Consider the outcome of a Grade E on extra cost of Gas / electric compared with a grade C, potentially around £1700/ yr , a grade D is Just over £700 .These are hard times and tennants already struggling will just not heat our properties – resulting in damp and mouldy conditions which cause the health of Tennants to deteriorate and have resulted in death.
Member Since March 2018 - Comments: 74
12:02 PM, 16th February 2025, About 1 year ago
Perhaps If the Government started to think of us as a business we would be able to afford to take a more personal view on such things as an EPC upgrade
Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2021
12:55 PM, 16th February 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Martin at 16/02/2025 – 12:02
That’s absolutely right. If the government let any small landlord claim rollover relief and incorporate then introduced capital allowances enabling us to invest in our incorporated businesses without penalty then these small BTL businesses could help solve the problem.
Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 1506
4:37 PM, 16th February 2025, About 1 year ago
Here’s a good laugh .I recently had an all electric property upgraded using the ECO4 scheme – new loft insulation, storage heaters and solar panels (yes, thank you government , cost me nothing). One thing these ECO4 companies DONT do is get another EPC certificate. So I shelled out for one to be done and the property came back as a D (only a few points needed to make it a C though) . Can’t do any of the silly stuff like insulating floors or walls, but what was recommended was £4,300 spending to get it to a C. Now here’s the laugh — The tenant is now paying on average £39 a month for electric (£468 a year). According to the EPC if I spend £4,300 then that will save her £334 a year. SO £458-£334 = £124. So her new electricity bill will be £10.33 on average. This is ridiculous, are landlords expected to to fork out £1000’s so the tenant has to pay nothing for electricity.. Incidentally, if I took up the underfloor and wall insulation options the tenant would be paying MINUS, yes MINUS £566 a year. How stupid can EPC’s get ?
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 463
6:07 PM, 16th February 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 16/02/2025 – 16:37
What on earth is your EPC person recommending that will cost £4300 but save your tenant £354 a year? In insulation terms that’s an excellent 6-7% annual return on investment, but I’m struggling to understand what practical measure would possibly get you that level of return, reducing the already low bills by two-thirds to a barely- believable £10 a month.
Also how did you qualify for free loft insulation, storage heaters AND solar panels, all under ECO4? My experience is you get nothing under ECO4 without being unemployed yourself or your tenant bring utterly impoverished, and you still have to lash out £thousands yourself. An energy assessor I employed also told me that I hadn’t a hope of ECO4 funding because the house – Edwardian solid-wall, detached 140m2 with a gas combi – is in southern England, so he refused to do the survey.
Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 1506
10:00 PM, 16th February 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by AnthonyJames at 16/02/2025 – 18:07Yup, my tenant was on Universal Credit – she was paid 69 PENCE a week – hardly worth collecting, but as she was on UC she qualified. So I guess I should be grateful for the £14k worth of ECO4 work that was done.
Member Since April 2017 - Comments: 225
10:30 PM, 16th February 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Andrew McCausland at 12/02/2025 – 10:43
Carbon reduction is a scam. Ditto for climate change, global warming or any other name they have used for it in the past. It is all in order to get money out of people.
Member Since April 2017 - Comments: 225
10:34 PM, 16th February 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Martin R at 16/02/2025 – 09:26
Yes, agree about tenants not heating sufficiently to keep the house in good order as it will cost them dear but net zero is just a scam. Governments, who are now corporations and NOT governments are there to squeeze as much money out of people as possible and to transfer wealth from the middle class to the upper class (you can go and check the statistics for how many new millionaires surfaced since Covid was introduced).
Member Since April 2017 - Comments: 225
10:37 PM, 16th February 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Peter Merrick at 12/02/2025 – 16:22
Yes, a lot of HMO’s are older buildings which don’t fare too well when it comes to cost for heating etc and also aren’t amenable to heat pumps and the like. Of course the government have not got a clue about buildings breathing and the difference between old and new buildings so they really don’t care how much landlords are going to suffer and tenants too.