Landlords face £65 annual PRS Database fee as HMRC takes on rent increase disputes

£65 landlord registration fee graphic highlighting the new PRS Database and rent increase disputes
11:56 AM, 9th September 2026, 2 days ago 66

Landlords will have to pay a £65 registration fee per property annually under the government’s new national landlord registration service.

The government has confirmed that landlords will be required to register their rental properties through its “Register Your Rental Property” service as the PRS database is rolled out across England.

The database will launch regionally, starting in the West Midlands in December, before being introduced across other areas over the following 12 months.

Alongside the PRS Database, the government has also announced additional power to the Valuation Office (VOA), allowing it to rule on rent disputes.

Important first step

Under the new rules, landlords will be required to provide information about their properties, including:

  • the property address;
  • the number of residents and bedrooms;
  • the amount of rent received; and
  • copies of required certificates, including gas, electricity and Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) documents.

The government adds under future legislation, landlords will also be required to register any unoccupied properties before marketing them for let. Letting agents and landlords will need to include registration numbers on adverts.

Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook said: “Rollout of a national landlord registration service is an important first step toward establishing our new innovative database of private rented sector properties which will empower tenants, support responsible landlords and help councils enforce our transformative Renters’ Rights Act.”

Fee is fair and sustainable

The government claim the £65 fee for each different property is “fair and sustainable” for landlords.

In a press release, the government said: “Landlords need to pay the fee each time you register a different property.

“The government has set the fee at a level that balances the need for fairness and sustainability for landlords, with the cost of operating the service, and tackling non-compliance in the private rented sector. In return for the fee, landlords will get access to information to help them meet their legal obligations and be able to show they are complying with the rules.

“Fees will also support activity to identify and act on non-compliance with the Renters’ Rights Act. This will include funding to help councils have the staff and skills they need to identify and tackle non-compliance and drive slum landlords who persist in breaking the law out of the sector.”

HMRC Valuation Office responsible for challenges to rent increases

The government have also announced that HMRC’s Valuation Office will become responsible for decisions on challenges to rent increases in England, rather than the First-Tier Tribunal.

Mr Pennycook explains: “By transferring responsibility for making initial rent determinations to HMRC’s Valuation Office, we will ensure that challenges to proposed rent increases are determined faster and pressure on the tribunal system is reduced, giving tenants and landlords confidence that rent disputes will continue to be resolved efficiently and effectively.”

Minister for Courts and Legal Services, Sarah Sackman, said: “I am on a mission to continue to modernise our courts and tribunals, from digital improvements to better efficiency, so those using the system can get justice sooner.”

“This change is another step in that plan. By ensuring rental disputes can be resolved through a new dedicated service, this will provide quicker decisions for renters and landlords while relieving future pressure on tribunals.”

For the moment, the government say renters who want to challenge a rent increase must still apply to the First-tier Tribunal.

According to the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA), the scheme is expected to take two years to be introduced, although it is not yet clear when this process will begin.

Industry reaction

Greg Tsuman, managing director for Lettings at Martyn Gerrard, said on the PRS Database: “While this is yet another expense for landlords to pay, £65 a year is unlikely to be the straw that breaks the camel’s back. This is a common-sense measure, and the increased transparency and improved standards it should create for the sector are well worth the cost.

“Landlords might balk at the prospect of more red tape, but in practice, the requirements are all things they should already have been doing. For most responsible landlords, the changes will be simple to manage. However, we are still awaiting the full details before we have complete clarity. A key question that remains unanswered is whether the responsibilities can be delegated to managing agents, as many landlords would prefer to rely on these services rather than handle everything themselves.

“The changes will help protect tenants from unscrupulous landlords and provide a clear warning to anyone considering renting a property if the landlord is not registered on the database. The additional transparency for tenants should reduce the risk of exposure to substandard properties. It should also prevent delays in starting a tenancy due to boiler or electrical issues. It is similar to ensuring that a car for sale has passed an MOT.”

Responding to the government’s announcement that HM Revenue and Customs’ Valuation Office will be responsible for decisions on challenges to rent increases in England,

Mr Tsuman said: “The Valuation Office is a logical choice for determining rental increases. It’s reassuring to see the Government’s awareness of the challenges involved in employing a professional surveyor to assess rental changes.

“The Valuation Office has all the requisite expertise, so it is only natural to rely on it as the most cost-effective solution for the taxpayer.”


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2511

    5:25 PM, 9th September 2026, About 2 days ago

    I just got an email from the NRLA saying that agents can’t list property details on this proposed database, landlords have to do it:

    https://www.nrla.org.uk/news/landlord-database-rollout-to-start-december?utm_campaign=Guest+-+PRS+database+announcement+09%2F09&utm_content=Breaking+news+%7C+Landlord+database%3A+Rollout+to+start+in+December&utm_medium=email&utm_source=GetResponse&utm_term=&gr_m=hRw&gr_co=wek&gr_s=2cg&gr_x=a62e

    I am very concerned about the protection of landlord personal data input to this database and I still cannot see any public benefit in this proposed database, over and above what the Land Registry already does. As far as I can see any proposed ‘benefits’ of this database are outweighed by all the risks.

  • Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1659

    6:05 PM, 9th September 2026, About 2 days ago

    Landlords or their agents need to keep the database up to date.

    This means at least two visits, one for the the annual rent increase and one for annual gas safe check. Add in the 5-yearly EICR and any change in occupancy and it is reasonable to estimate 3 update events per year.

    If agents charge £200 to issue a Section 13 it’s likely that they will also charge £100 to update the database. That’s £300 for three updates each year. Or £25 per month for the tenant.

  • Member Since August 2024 - Comments: 39

    6:17 PM, 9th September 2026, About 2 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Luke P at 09/09/2026 – 13:29
    Many thanks for the info, appreciated

  • Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2312 - Articles: 2

    8:09 PM, 9th September 2026, About 2 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 18:05
    You forgot the fourth update, to pay the TAX, which the government euphemistically call a fee.

  • Member Since June 2023 - Comments: 9

    8:43 PM, 9th September 2026, About 2 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by No hate plz at 09/09/2026 – 12:26
    Of course we will pass it on in rent increases. Another nail in the coffin if the prs.

  • Member Since January 2022 - Comments: 17

    8:45 PM, 9th September 2026, About 2 days ago

    Funny how the minister for courts and legal service wants to improve the tribunal system for quicker results but obviously not the eviction process taking around a year or more when those tenants play the system and stop paying or via instruction from the council to sit tight 🙄

  • Member Since January 2022 - Comments: 108

    9:12 PM, 9th September 2026, About 2 days ago

    WHY?
    What possible benefit does this bring?
    Pretty sure my tenants will LOVE me posting if they live alone, or having to tell me because they split up and now live alone ?!?
    not to mention who bets we have to pay to update details.
    Looks like I am selling up sooner than planned
    The Gov are a joke and blight on the rental market

  • Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 260

    10:36 PM, 9th September 2026, About 2 days ago

    ‘Landlords might balk at the prospect of more red tape, but in practice, the requirements are all things they should already have been doing. For most responsible landlords, the changes will be simple to manage. ‘
    Does this person have any idea what he is talking about. At the moment we all, probably, have up to date certificates etc. but we don’t have to upload them into a public database, and pay for the privilege. Adding extra admin work as well, when probably if you are like me time is short already. Why is the fee chargeable each year, once a property is registered that should be it. Another government create a cost project to please the landlord hating community.
    I’ve been a landlord for close to 40 years, and this now becoming the final straw and for the first time I am seriously thinking about throwing it all in.

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2511

    9:47 AM, 10th September 2026, About 2 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 09/09/2026 – 18:05
    The link I posted above your post to an article from the NRLA says that agents can’t do it: Even if agents are paid to do it they are going to be putting landlord personal details on a public database. I am seriously concerned about the additional risk of fraud caused by this database. I am targeted by fraudsters every month, another one today; but at least I run a business and I’m able to spot fraud. But government loses personal data all the time.

    https://www.gbnews.com/news/police-data-leak-officers-staff-dark-web

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_UK_government_data_losses

    There is no way that I would put any details onto this database voluntarily. Presumably if landlords are victims of fraud because of security failures at this database (which serves no useful purpose) landlords will be able to sue the government for their losses.

  • Member Since November 2020 - Comments: 81

    10:08 AM, 10th September 2026, About 2 days ago

    In the official, government Ministry of Housing (etc) press release I received directly yesterday, I am staggered that there was absolutely zero mention of the cost per property, per year. The sub-title is “All Landlords must sign up to new, simple ‘Register your rental property service’ as it rolls out across the country.”

    The final section goes on to detail “What landlords need to know” without any reference to the cost, as if it’s so trivial that it’s not worth mentioning. That demonstrates a total disregard for considering the landlord’s position.

    For example, a landlord with property in parts of the north east, such as some former mining towns, with annual per property average income of just £5,500 and say 4 properties, (£22k turnover p.a.), will pay £260 per year in addition to all other obligations, possibly including a selective licensing fee each 5 years of about £700. In theory that’s about £200 per year plus admin costs to pass on to the tenant, but that’s not really doable any more because market rent, determined by the valuation office, will use its own metrics. This should surely have been tied to council tax band on a sliding scale. Anyway, I believe we should be receiving a tax credit for doing this, and why on earth should it be annually charged? You could be required to update it when changes happen in the future- that’s fine. We can do that for you for free.

    By the way, why should South West landlords get to delay what ,for a portfolio landlord with 50 properties, is a payment of £3,250, almost a year after West Midlands? Was this done as a shortest straw draw in a house of commons select(ive) committee room?

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles