1 year ago | 2 comments
More than 200 private tenants are being evicted by a Labour-run council to address its growing housing waiting list, the Daily Telegraph reports.
The council aims to rehouse families currently living in temporary accommodation, which costs the borough £28 million annually.
The local authority, which is grappling with a £70 million deficit, has more than 4,700 homeless families in ‘unsuitable and expensive’ temporary housing — 1,300 more than two years ago.
Homes for Lambeth, a council-owned private company, has been renting homes at market rates for nearly a decade.
However, Lambeth Council has reclassified these properties for temporary accommodation, issuing Section 21 notices to around 160 families.
The tenants argue the council is forcing them into homelessness.
Jules Zakolska, 27, has been campaigning against the council’s decision and has been told she must vacate her home by April.
She told the Telegraph: “The Labour party ran its campaign on the premise that it will abolish Section 21 evictions.
“Yet in Lambeth, a Labour council is serving its own residents with Section 21 notices.
“I am just very determined to try to fight this because it’s really unjust, unethical and doesn’t make sense logically or financially.”
She added: “We are the least well-off private renters in the borough, and lots of us have children and are classed as vulnerable.
“Once evicted, the majority of us will become homeless.”
A Lambeth spokesman told the newspaper: “The council has 4,745 homeless households in often unsuitable and expensive temporary accommodation.
“This is unacceptable and unsustainable, with the cost resulting in financial pressure impacting on all council services.
“We need to use all means at our disposal to provide the most disadvantaged and vulnerable families in Lambeth with a safe, decent home.”
They added: “We apologise for the impact this decision has on those renting these homes, but we now need to use these homes for those with [the] most urgent need for housing.”
Elsewhere in London, 150 residents at Vive Living in Deptford received Section 21 notices just before Christmas, including a cafe owner who lost both his home and livelihood.
These residents, like those in Lambeth, have struggled to find alternative accommodation in a competitive rental market.
Lambeth’s Homelessness Prevention Team will conduct “priority needs assessments” for affected tenants and consider temporary housing until long-term solutions are found.
The borough’s social housing waiting list includes more than 40,000 households.
In October, Lambeth proposed repurposing 163 homes on six estates for emergency accommodation.
So far, more than 60 homes have been returned to the council, with nine relet to homeless families.
The borough faces an unprecedented housing crisis, with 40,000 people on the waiting list and 4,700 homeless families in temporary accommodation.
When the scheme was announced, Coun Danny Adilypour, the council’s deputy leader, said: “We are committed to doing all we can to tackle the housing crisis.
“The supply of affordable housing for vulnerable and homeless families is under huge pressure.
“Bringing these privately rented homes back into use as council accommodation will deliver much-needed homes as quickly as possible for our most vulnerable residents in Lambeth.”
Lambeth is also accelerating efforts to bring empty council housing up to lettable standards – 381 empty properties have been identified, with 133 ready to be relet.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Renters' Rights Bill heads to the Lords with key amendments
1 year ago | 2 comments
1 year ago | 9 comments
2 years ago | 1 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since April 2023 - Comments: 88
10:45 AM, 22nd January 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Ray Guselli at 18/01/2025 – 10:48
Why Farage?
Unless of course you too believe mainstream media’s racist divisive lies that migrants are all homeless, entering the UK by the boat loads and are all being housed?!
Member Since April 2023 - Comments: 88
10:47 AM, 22nd January 2025, About 1 year ago
You are aware I take it that the majority of homeless households in temporary accommodation such as B& B’s are UK nationals?
Why would someone’s immigration status presume them to be homeless occupants of B& B’s?
Unless of course you honestly believe those divisive and racist mainstream media headlines!
Member Since May 2022 - Comments: 89
10:56 AM, 22nd January 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Ma’at Housing Solutions at 22/01/2025 – 10:45
Because there was an invitation to do so.
Sorry if you have a problem with that
Member Since May 2022 - Comments: 89
11:00 AM, 22nd January 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Ma’at Housing Solutions at 22/01/2025 – 10:47
I consider the evidence and base my opinion on that.
If the number of people crossing the channel and entering the UK illegally by whatever means is fictional, then I suggest you take it up with whoever provides the information and evidence and ensure they correct any alleged misinformation.
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1630 - Articles: 3
2:11 PM, 22nd January 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Ma’at Housing Solutions at 22/01/2025 – 10:37
Of course the majority in temporary accommodation are UK Nationals. That’s because there are rather a lot more UK Nationals than illegal migrants and asylum seekers. But if you looked at the percentage of those illegal migrants and asylum seekers who are in temporary accommodation, compared to the percentage who are not, I suspect you’d find it’s close to 100%. And they are given priority over UK Nationals on the housing waiting list. Why?
Member Since February 2018 - Comments: 627
11:33 AM, 28th June 2025, About 10 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 15/01/2025 – 16:57
I don’t know why this appeared in the Roundup today but that word is apposite, the Bill is as toxic as that glyphosate based weedkiller, as suggested in the post, it kills flexibility and accommodation between consenting parties, indeed, just this week I have opted to proceed with one applicant over another precisely because of the unilalateral imposition of periodic tenancies, another tenancy is coming to the end of a three year stay each year of which was paid upfront by her parents, even newly qual’d solucitors don’t get paid enough, it’s a disaster and even one contact at the TDS agreed. The MP reeled off a number of other messes caused by this government, unfortunately, the volume and scope of government created harms can no longer be considered accidental, not confined to this country by any means it is thoroughly mendacious and is driven by such as Agenda 30, and the creation of fake ‘crises’ driving us all to social self immolation.