Kitchen fire doors for two storey HMO’s and LHA requirements?

Kitchen fire doors for two storey HMO’s and LHA requirements?

13:24 PM, 27th November 2018, About 5 years ago 41

Text Size

There appears to be a conflict relating to the need for a kitchen fire door in two storey HMO’s. The Lacors Housing Fire Safety Guide, click here to download, and The Licensing and Management of Houses in Multiple Occupation and Other Houses (Miscellaneous Provisions) (England) Regulations 2006 Schedule 3 Article 3 (ix) click here to download.

The 2006 Regs relates to HMO’s of all sizes whether licensed or not. Additionally, it does not distinguish between HMO’s let under a single AST or multiple AST (per bedroom (bedsits).

For two storey HMO’s, the subject of this article, Lacors page 41 (Escape routes) states that there is no need for fire doors, assuming a sound construction standard for the primary escape route. For bedsits, however, 30 minute fire doors are required (page 43). So, under Lacors guidance, two storey HMO’s of sound construction let under a single AST would not require fire doors to any room.

However, the 2006 Regs state that an “appropriate” fire door must be fitted to the kitchen. I am aware that the Lacors definition of a fire door (30 min fire door & frame) does not accept a close fitting solid door. However, does the word “appropriate” in the 2006 Regs imply a solid close fitting door would be ok?

There seems to be confusion between LHA’s licensing standards for HMO’s. Some follow Lacors, where a fire risk assessment will identify additional requirements, and others follow the 2006 Regs where some have defined “appropriate” in different ways (some a fire door as defined by Lacors some  a close fitting solid door.

Insisting on kitchen fire doors (30 minute fire door with frame) will subject many landlords to the unnecessary additional cost of installing a kitchen fire door in situations where it adds not safety value at all. Two storey HMO’s will normally have a secondary means of escape (1st floor windows) and many will have kitchens set well back from the primary escape route. In this case I do not feel that a kitchen fire door (30 min fire door with frame) is necessary (assuming kitchen heat detector is fitted).

Has anyone experienced an LHA insisting on a kitchen fire door as required by 2006 Regs where “appropriate” has been interpreted as a 30 minute rated fire door and not a solid close fitting door? If so, have you challenged the LHA’s definition of “appropriate” and if so what was the conclusion?

Did you go to a Rent Tribunal?

Thanks.

Rob


Share This Article


Comments

Rob Crawford

17:49 PM, 19th April 2019, About 5 years ago

Reply to the comment left by PJB at 19/04/2019 - 16:22
Hi PJB, I may well be 🙂 ! My question relates purely to one and two storey HMO's only and the interpretation of wording used in The Management of HMO Regs 2006 Schedule 3, 3(b)(ix). "appropriate fire doors". Some LA's (such as Bristol) interpret the word "appropriate" as giving a choice, accepting a 30min rated fire door (for high risk kitchen) or "a well constructed and close-fitting conventional door" as defined in Lacors for a low risk kitchen. The standard adopted by some other LA's (such as B&NES) emphasis is on the word "fire door". Interpreting this to mean all HMO's as requiring a 30min rated fire door, irrespective of the risk level! Which interpretation is correct? Has anyone challenged either interpretation? What was the outcome?

PJB

18:59 PM, 19th April 2019, About 5 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Rob Crawford at 19/04/2019 - 17:49
Hello Rob,
I have not crossed swords with BANES (yet) but have done so with Welhat. The Welhat property is a two storey student HMO on a 'whole of house' HMO agreement. Welhat came in 'all guns blazing' until I pointed out various points in Lacors and its addendum (see my posting much earlier in this thread). The kitchen doors (one to a utility & rear exit and the other to the hall and the front exit) were already equipped with 30 min. fire doors. The two storey dwelling is important if 450x450mm min. escape windows are provided giving the all important secondary escape route. It means that the full measures cannot be insisted upon. Our case, the staircase did not need to fireproofed and the door closers & window restrictors to the first rooms did not need to be provided.
From what I have witnessed, the interpretation of the rules takes place at the local level. In our case, I used Lacors and health & safety objections to successfully negotiate with the local council e.g. door closers are far more dangerous when trying to transport scalding hot drinks through a doorway that is determined to push you out of the way and window restrictors that prevent the fire services from attempting a rescue.
Because these matters are decided and implemented at local level, there is no statute or case law that can be applied.
My feeling that it is the council will need to accept your case that a well constructed and close-fitting solid conventional door will be sufficient. The council should be receptive to Lacors, especially if low risk 'family' style AST agreements operate and there is a secondary escape route. The council will also take advice from the local fire service. It might be worth enquiring with them to see how the land lies.

Rob Crawford

19:07 PM, 19th April 2019, About 5 years ago

Reply to the comment left by PJB at 19/04/2019 - 18:59The local fire service won't comment as fire safety for hmo's is assigned to the LA's. As your aware, it's the same fire service that encompasses both B&NES and Bristol. B&NES consider Lacors as a guide and the Act as law, hence their stance.

PJB

19:22 PM, 19th April 2019, About 5 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Rob Crawford at 19/04/2019 - 19:07
I share your pain. I have long thought there should be a realistic and unequivocal set of combined national standards for the implementation fire, health and safety standards. From I have observed. all councils are different as are the officials that work in them. Everyone needs to sing from the same song sheet.
Personally, I would bite the bullet and fit fire doors and store the originals if required to sell the property later.

Rob Crawford

20:10 PM, 19th April 2019, About 5 years ago

Reply to the comment left by PJB at 19/04/2019 - 19:22
I'm not sure all landlords would agree with your roll-over and accept it approach! Indeed we should not have to!

PJB

20:59 PM, 19th April 2019, About 5 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Rob Crawford at 19/04/2019 - 20:10
Since there are no national standards, all we can do is negotiate with the local officials. If they don't want to converse, there is little we can effectively do except grit out teeth and avoid the consequences.
The fight for uniform and sane standards is better directed at national level with all our representative bodies joining in to promote Lacors & its addendum as the national standard with relevant conflicting Health & Safety issues thrown in.

Zen

13:05 PM, 20th June 2020, About 4 years ago

Reply to the comment left by PJB at 28/11/2018 - 09:34
Have you had that confirmed by the LA housing department that they are willing to accept windows rather than protected stairwell escape?

Sjp

23:33 PM, 20th June 2020, About 4 years ago

I have a two storey HMO. LA inspector visited and insisted on fire door between kitchen and hall way but allowed me to fit a Dorguard to enable light to enter kitchen. My licence was dependent on this amongst other things.

PJB

0:57 AM, 21st June 2020, About 4 years ago

Reply to the comment left by at 20/06/2020 - 13:05
I quoted all the relevant sections of Lacors and its addendums to the LA housing department. They grudgingly agreed that a secondary means of escape meant that protecting the staircase was not mandatory.

Anne Nixon

10:57 AM, 21st June 2020, About 4 years ago

Reply to the comment left by PJB at 21/06/2020 - 00:57
Well done PJB, you did better than I was able to do.
I now have an unused en suite room because the LA wouldn't accept an escape window in lieu of a protected escape route.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now