Insure What’s Behind the Door: Shocking ‘Nightmare Tenants Slum Landlords’

Insure What’s Behind the Door: Shocking ‘Nightmare Tenants Slum Landlords’

8:55 AM, 22nd July 2019, About 3 years ago 2

Text Size

I think viewers of this week’s episode of ‘Nightmare Tenants Slum Landlords’ will find it hard to believe that the damage to a property in Cardiff was caused by just one person.

Of course, the show highlights some of the more extreme cases of bad landlord and tenant behaviour, but it is also a stark reminder that this can happen to anyone.  If you don’t have landlord insurance specifically covering Malicious Damage, or the skills to repair the damage yourself like builders Stuart and Steve in this week’s case, the outcome could be even more costly and distressing.

Earlier in the year my team received a call from Stuart Haines. Stuart and his best friend Steve are seasoned landlords with a combined portfolio of 30 properties. As builders who have worked together for 15 years, they have renovated and let many properties, but never had they experienced anything like this…and in all honesty, it even shocked me.

Stuart and Steve let one of their properties in Cardiff, but after 4 months they stopped receiving rent.  With the tenant subsequently denying them access to carry out necessary maintenance, they called on us at Landlord Action to help. Getting possession of the property seemed easy in comparison to what we were faced with when we entered the property.

There wasn’t a single room in the property that hadn’t been vandalised. Not only were there belongings everywhere, anything and everything that once made up this property had been damaged, including a shattered sink, broken tiles, hammer holes in the walls, doors hanging off, cigarette burns all over the floor and graffiti writing throughout the property. There were also pigeon feathers everywhere in the property. The pictures speak for themselves and viewers will see the full extent on tonight’s show – watch my face!

The costs faced by Stuart and Steve totalled more than £25,000, made up of £5,000 rent arrears, £2,000 in court fees and £20,000 to repair and refurbish the property.

Although the pair are in a more fortunate position than most since they have the skills to put the property back together, they feel let down by the system which allowed a vulnerable tenant with mental health issues to reside in their property.

Steve said “We are in a fortunate enough position that we have a property portfolio to buffer some of the expense we have incurred and since we are builders, the condition of the flat does not put us off. However, I believe for many an experience such as this would break them mentally and financially. Direct payments from the council stopped because the tenant failed to fill out the correct paperwork, but we are at a loss as to why we as landlords were penalised when we continued to house the tenant.”

In contrast, our second case on this week’s show sees a seemingly professional tenant turn out to be a nightmare for Jean Pierre Barakat and his wife after a series of broken promises.

Jean Pierre has a property in Finchley, North London. Having given up a career as a photographer to take care of his disabled on, Jean relies on his income as a landlord to live. He let it to a privately educated individual who worked in the city and was confident that the tenant had the means to cover the rent.

As it turned out, the tenant could afford the rent, but instead was using the money (totalling £7,000-£8,000 arrears) to set up his own business.  By complete coincidence, the tenant used to work for an old friend of mine, and after a long conversation between just him and I, he agreed to leave. Unfortunately, the relationship between the landlord and tenant had reached the point of no return resulting in threatening behaviour following an encounter at the property.

Watch Nightmare Tenants Slum Landlords on Channel 5, Monday at 9pm to find out what happens.

Contact Landlord Action

Specialists in tenant eviction and debt collection. Regulated by The Law Society.


Tim Rogers

13:15 PM, 22nd July 2019, About 3 years ago

Hi Paul,
In one of the more recent programs there were situations where the landlord decided / considered paying tenants to leave. As was clear in one instance the tenant was deliberately pushing for this as a revenue source. Irrespective of the accrued arrears and costs.
In your experience, how common is this now?
With the possibility of the restructure of S8, (due to the demise of S21), is there a constructive recommendation that could be made to block such actions?

Kind regards, T

Mick Roberts

15:37 PM, 26th July 2019, About 3 years ago

Excuse my delay, behind with emails as usual.

Here's some of mine I save for quick showing, when people say Tenant don't wreck houses. They are right, just some do: Tenants from Hell Bulwell. Tenants from Hell Bestwood Park Tenants from Hell Top Valley Nov 2010 Tenants from Hell May 12th 2010. Tenants from Hell May 10th 2010.

The rest are on

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership


Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now