HMO landlords brace for chaos as EPC rules could tighten

HMO landlords brace for chaos as EPC rules could tighten

Modern apartment block with energy efficiency rating chart and sign urging landlords to know EPC rules
12:01 AM, 17th February 2025, 1 year ago 3

Changes to the EPC system could cause chaos for HMO landlords and short-term lets.

Proposals in the EPC consultation suggest that HMO landlords may be required to have a valid EPC for the entire property, even when only a single room is rented out.

Currently, an EPC is only required for an HMO when the whole house is rented out.

Valid EPC will help tenants

In the third series of articles about the EPC consultation, we delve into what the proposals could mean for HMOs and short-term lets.

The consultation says requiring HMOs to have an EPC will provide consistency across the private rented sector.

The consultation states: “The private rented sector minimum energy efficiency standard (MEES) regulations apply to most domestic rental properties which are required to have an EPC.

“Mandating EPCs for HMOs when a single room is rented out will ensure that HMOs will need to comply with the requirements set out in the MEES Regulations if they did not have a valid EPC before this point.

“A valid EPC for an HMO when a room is rented out would ensure that a prospective HMO tenant could make informed decisions based on the energy performance of the building and an indication of potential energy costs.”

The consultation claims that requiring landlords to obtain EPCs for HMOs, will improve living conditions for tenants.

The consultation says: “As HMOs are disproportionately occupied by vulnerable people, we anticipate that these measures will help ensure that tenants are living in thermally comfortable properties, with reduced costs during a time of high fuel poverty.”

Many HMOs are typically Victorian buildings that have been converted into self-contained units, changing the rules on EPCs could make it harder for landlords to make the necessary upgrades to their property.

EPC throughout a tenancy

The EPC consultation also reveals if the government plans to introduce a requirement for an EPC throughout the tenancy, then an HMO will need to expand EPC requirements.

The consultation says: “For HMOs where there are often multiple separate tenancies running concurrently for a single property, this change will require an EPC to be in place at the point of marketing for the first letting, up to and including the date the final letting comes to an end.”

However, the consultation makes no mention of the changes in the Renters’ Rights Bill where all tenancies will become periodic and does not list any details on how this will align with the changes in EPCs.

The government says if the proposals come into force then HMO landlords will be given a 24 month transitional period to obtain a valid EPC.

EPCs for short-term rentals

For short-term rentals, the government says the current guidance only requires an EPC for furnished holiday lets.

The consultation states: “There are no specific requirements set out in the Energy Performance of Buildings (EPB) regulations themselves.

“The current guidance states that an EPC is only required for properties rented out as a furnished holiday let, as defined by HMRC, where the building is occupied for the purposes of a holiday as a result of a short-term letting arrangement of less than 31 days to each tenant, and is rented out for a combined total of four months or more in any 12-month period, and if the occupier is responsible for meeting the energy costs for the property.”

The government says: “The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government is working with the Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) to ensure that the definition of short-term rental property within the regulations aligns with DCMS’s definition of a short-term rental property.”

The government is now proposing to update the regulations to explicitly require short-term rental properties to have a valid EPC when they are let. This requirement will apply regardless of whether the occupier is responsible for meeting the energy costs.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since December 2022 - Comments: 18

    1:37 PM, 17th February 2025, About 1 year ago

    Can somebody explain what would happen in the scenario where it was not economically viable or practically possible to upgrade a HMO to a C with tenants in situ and you give tenants notice (once the so called ‘no fault eviction ‘ right has been removed) but they refuse to leave?

    Will tenants just stay in a non compliant property or will landlords have the ability to eviction on EPC grounds?

  • Member Since October 2022 - Comments: 204

    1:24 PM, 18th February 2025, About 1 year ago

    Reply to the comment left by Mark Pickersgill at 17/02/2025 – 13:37
    They will probably just order the landlord to carry out the work, no ifs or buts, and hit them with egregious and punitive fines when they are unable to comply, until the landlord is bankrupt.

    Or the landlord could just sell the property or refuse to pay the mortgage and let the mortgage company deal with the property.

    I see absolute carnage ahead as long as our politicians continue to be driven by ideology.

  • Member Since October 2024 - Comments: 11

    6:31 PM, 18th February 2025, About 1 year ago

    First of all there is a cost cap, proposed to be £15,000. If this cap is spent and the EPC is still not a C, then the property will be exempted of doing anything further and will still be able to be occupied at a lower rating.
    Secondly, some elements of improvements will potentially give a good points per pound expenditure, such as PV panels on the roof. For the purpose of this exercise let’s not complicate this scenario with listed buildings. Typically, using the current methodology, 2.5kWp of PV will give an improvement of between 8 – 11 points for a cost of circa £3k -£4k (assuming no access issues). If the PV was increased to say 4kWP, you might expect 12 – 16 points improvement, cost circa £5 k – £6k
    It is unlikely that this improvement would cause much, if any disruption, to tenants and assuming the landlord is paying the utility bill, the landlord over time will get a return on their investment in lower utility bills.
    In closing, the above are typical improvement point values but do depend upon other factors within the property so it is important that landlords obtain the services of a good energy assessor to model and advise improvement values on a case by case basis.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles