Government insists selective licensing and PRS Database serve different purposes

Government insists selective licensing and PRS Database serve different purposes

PRS Database shield over selective licensing document highlighting landlord regulation changes
9:08 AM, 30th December 2025, 4 months ago 16

A peer has raised concerns over the potential overlap between selective licensing schemes and the upcoming Private Rented Sector (PRS) Database.

In a written question, Lord Truscott asked whether the government has assessed whether the PRS Database, to be introduced under the Renters’ Rights Act, would duplicate existing selective licensing schemes.

However, the government has insisted that selective licensing schemes and the PRS Database serve different purposes.

Selective licensing and the Private Rented Sector Database have different purposes

Lord Truscott asked the government: “What assessment they have made of whether local authority selective licensing for residential properties will duplicate the private rented sector database in the Renters’ Rights Act 2025; and what assessment they have made of the impact of each of those schemes on costs for landlords and tenants.”

In response, Baroness Taylor of Stevenage, Parliamentary under-secretary for housing, said: “Selective licensing and the Private Rented Sector Database have different purposes. Unlike the Database, selective licensing schemes aim to target specific local issues by enabling more intensive proactive enforcement strategies.

“We recognise the need to keep requirements for landlords proportionate and fair. While Database registration brings some additional requirements, we are committed to ensuring these remain reasonable.

“We will continue to review the use of selective licensing as we develop the Private Rented Sector Database, refining the way the two systems work together.”

All landlords will need to sign up for the database

Under the Renters’ Rights Act, all landlords will need to sign up for the database, which will include information about their properties that tenants can access.

If a landlord lets or advertises a property without it first being registered on the database, they can be issued with a civil penalty of up to £7,000 or a £40,000 fine if they provide fraudulent information to the database.

As previously reported, on Property118, the government previously hinted at combining the registration process for the PRS database and Ombudsman, but stopped short of confirming whether landlords will be required to pay separate fees for each scheme.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1186

    4:45 PM, 30th December 2025, About 4 months ago

    “Unlike the Database, selective licensing schemes aim to target specific local issues by enabling more intensive proactive enforcement strategies.”

    I’m not clear what additional information over and above that to be provided by the database will specifically help the Councils enforcement strategies. Isn’t the truth that its the licence fee that enables the enforcement strategies, not the information it provides.

  • Member Since January 2023 - Comments: 318

    7:20 AM, 31st December 2025, About 4 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by DPT at 30/12/2025 – 16:45
    Selective licencing was meant for in small SELECTIVE areas of the borough BUT now SL is now becoming almost borough wide so ridiculous as it is no longer targeted. Just the council right to inspect without warrant and fine low hanging fruit/signed up LLs to generate income.

  • Member Since August 2024 - Comments: 24

    7:49 AM, 31st December 2025, About 4 months ago

    Any information on whether the number of rentals on the national database will generate multiple fees ?
    If not then their so called “smaller landlords” (hate that term) will have to increase the tenants rental by more than the landlords with multiple houses.
    On the presumption that the commie government is not THAT thick then the thinking is surely there will be a fee, for EVERY property the landlord owns, on the database. ???

  • Member Since February 2020 - Comments: 362

    10:03 AM, 31st December 2025, About 4 months ago

    As a software developer, I find it bizarre, you wouldn’t combine the two. There is a principle in development, the DRY principle. Which means Don’t Repeat Yourself.

    But as this is not a service offered by business for a customer, instead by a greedy institution for its own selfish needs then they don’t care.

  • Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1646 - Articles: 3

    10:26 AM, 31st December 2025, About 4 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Crouchender at 31/12/2025 – 07:20
    ‘Selective’ means councils will select to implement, following the usual ‘consultation’.

  • Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 1507

    5:58 PM, 31st December 2025, About 4 months ago

    That means they can charge you (the tenants) twice.

    Any documents I deliver to the tenants I do personally and always get a signature. (Had one years ago took me to court as I wouldn’t return the deposit – I have never taken deposits — It didn’t get to court and she ended up out of pocket with court fees)

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles