24 hours ago | 13 comments
Generation Rent claims renters could save hundreds of pounds a year under the government’s proposed rent freeze.
Media reports from The Guardian suggest ministers are considering imposing a year-long freeze on rents.
The reported move comes despite previous government claims that it had no plans to introduce rent controls.
According to Generation Rent, if the average household faced a 1.9% rent increase over the next year, in line with current trends, they would spend an additional £324 across the year on rent, or £27 a month.
On average, private renters spend over 36% of their income on rent, with the government’s definition of an affordable rent being 30% of someone’s income or less.
Ben Twomey, chief executive of Generation Rent, said: “Homes are the foundations of our lives. But when we are forced to spend too much of our income on rent, it means children are going to school hungry or older renters who can’t afford to turn the heating on.
“Many renters are already paying more than we can afford. Further rent rises due to international events way out of our control would pull even more people into poverty. It’s encouraging that the government is considering a rent freeze and we urge them to press ahead and bring it in as quickly as possible to give renters the breathing space we need.”
However, despite Generation Rent’s claims that renters could save hundreds of pounds, rent controls often have the opposite effect. As previously reported by Property118, Scotland’s rent cap has been blamed for driving up rents, with prices rising by 11.6%.
Data by Hamptons reveals Scottish landlords are increasing rents at a faster pace than anywhere else in Great Britain because of rent controls reshaping the market.
Lead analyst at Hamptons, David Fell, said: “The evidence from Scotland suggests that rent controls rarely work as intended.
“At best, they delay rent increases; at worst, they set a new benchmark where landlords feel compelled to increase their rents every year by the maximum allowed.
“Faced with uncertainty over future rules, many landlords choose to raise rents little and often rather than risk falling far below market levels.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Shared owners may be exempt from 12-month no re-let rule
24 hours ago | 13 comments
2 months ago | 11 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1598
8:48 AM, 30th April 2026, About 31 minutes ago
I have one property where the rent is £600 per month and well below market rate.
A rent freeze would see the tenants save £7,200 per year. But they would be homeless.