Do landlords need to provide alternative accommodation under Ground 6?
Just read through the Guidance – Grounds for possession: guidance for landlords and letting agents, which was updated on 10 April 2026 with Ground 6 – redevelopment.
The ground says: You will be able to use this ground if you will need to redevelop or demolish the property, and your tenant cannot live there whilst it is being demolished or redeveloped. Usually, you can’t evict someone on this basis in the first 6 months of the tenancy but the exact requirements can vary.
If you are a social landlord, you may also need to provide alternative accommodation. If so, the accommodation will need to meet specific conditions. It will need to be affordable, in an appropriate location and house the people in your tenant’s household without overcrowding.
However, you will not need to provide alternative accommodation if you gave your tenant notice before the tenancy started that you intended to use ground 6.
Question: Are we sure the demand to provide alternative accommodation is limited to only social landlords? Would it be wise to include a reference to this in new PRS tenancies post 1st May, just to cover our backs? I’m thinking this will be a very useful ground come 2029 if the EPC palaver/drama hits the headlines again, as I might be finally declaring ‘I’m out’!
Thanks,
Reluctant landlord
Comments
Have Your Say
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Rent price gaps widen across the UKNext Article
220,000 homes set to leave the PRS this year
Member Since February 2024 - Comments: 71
10:17 AM, 17th April 2026, About 6 minutes ago
Thank you for helping my knowledge grow re section 6.
I rent out my leasehold flat, the council is the freeholder. Several years ago, but after my current tenant moved in, the council made known their intention to demolish the flats, most of which are occupied by council tenants renting directly from the council.
Since that announcement, I have heard nothing.
So if the flats are actually demolished,
please can anyone give me an idea of the process the council will have to go through w r t leaseholders, and their tenants?
The RRA tells me I have to give a certain minimum notice period for demolition.
I have not mentioned Section 6 in the tenancy agreement which is now a periodic tenancy.
It’s not my decision to demolish- so is it my responsibility to re-house my tenant or the council’s responsibility?
They are lovely flats, in a lovely part of the city and it is a great shame the council wants rid of them.