1 year ago | 7 comments
Hello, What is the legal position when a new lessee takes over a property 5 years after a permanent boundary change is in place and was agreed in writing but one party (the lessee) subsequently dies before registering the deed of variation with Land Registry? Still ongoing for 5 years!
My wife and I purchased an upper flat as the Lessors (Landlord) 20 yrs ago. It had a shared yard with a single entrance for bins etc.
For years, the owner of the ground floor flat (Lessee) suggested dividing up the yard with a separate entrance for each of us and this would improve privacy. We agreed to this as it would add value in the event of either party needing to sell up in the future.
I paid for 93% of the project as the Lessee said she could not afford to go half (as required per the Lease agreement). Land Registry suggested that I need not employ a solicitor to do this (est £1,000 min) and so I drew up a simple deed of variation and amended the plan and all documents were duly signed and witnessed in November 2019 and I submitted an AP1.
However, in order to register the Deed of Variation, Land Registry requested a letter of agreement from each party’s lenders. However, lenders would only accept a written request from each party’s solicitor. That is when problems started.
The Lessor had an accident and gladly recovered but this delayed proceedings and she later died and the estate went into probate. The solicitors for the Lessee’s first solicitor was sacked for not carrying out directions or engaging with my solicitor and the seller’s new solicitor also failed to engage and let a sale by auction proceed in 2024 without informing my solicitor.
The auction buyer of the property (property investor) now has me over a barrel claiming ignorance of the draft Deed of Variation stating that it was not in the Auction pack (written testimony from seller in Sept 2024 contests this) even though buyer viewed property with seller before submitting a bid – a brick built boundary wall has now been in place (5 years).
Buyer states there is insufficient access for a mobility scooter through the new gate (standard size) and overall the new layout of yard is less advantageous to him.
After a discussion with the new owner’s solicitor, my solicitor has told me that I cannot proceed with a new deed of variation without agreement from the new owner even though I have a written agreement from the previous owner and new owner may sign new Deed of Variation if I reduce the price of granting a lease extension at say 50% of the market cost £9k including fees.
I have already shelled out several hundred pounds in legal fees and am no further forward 5 years into this case. I believe my solicitor has been negligent/incompetent by not using other means to make contact with the seller’s solicitor(s) (asking me if I can get the previous and new owner to make their solicitors engage with him!!).
NB. In an email to seller’s solicitor, my solicitor identified the previous Lessee as the “FREEHOLDER” instead of the LEASEHOLDER and in reply the seller’s solicitor did the same ! ).
Obviously, I am dissatisfied with the service I have NOT received and had to ask about the complaints procedure which prompted some movement but apart from terminating the services of my solicitor and starting again, has anyone any other useful suggestions. (I have kept a record of all emails and texts)
Signed,
Exasperated
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
HMO landlords brace for chaos as EPC rules could tightenNext Article
What are my legal options if my tenant has died?
1 year ago | 7 comments
1 year ago | 15 comments
1 year ago | 2 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since August 2013 - Comments: 788
1:32 AM, 23rd February 2025, About 1 year ago
From what I understand here is that OP being the Lessor (Freeholder) and owner of the upper flat and must have had a right to use the garden on the Ground floor flat, so it must be mentioned in lower floor (lessee’s) lease that the garden is to be shared and not exclusive to lower floor owner/lessee,
So the new Lessee can either agree to divide it so that each divided part of the garden becomes exclusive to each floor with a common entrance leading up to individual gardens.
Other than that both parties must allow each other full access to that garden, it seems that the new lessee seems to want to make that garden exclusive for his own use and he may well have bought it on this bases, and may or may not have seen that dividing wall, which was most likely not known to exist by the previous deceased lessee’s solicitor disposing off her part of the lease to the new lessee.
Best to widen the access for the new lessee’s Motability scooter and sign up new DoV. Come to some agreement. Again this will depend if the new lessee wants a dividing wall or prefers to share the whole garden with the lessor.
Member Since August 2013 - Comments: 788
1:43 AM, 23rd February 2025, About 1 year ago
On the other hand OP has all the evidence that the previous Lessee had agreed and signed the DoV and it was submitted to Land registry for registration who had asked for consent from Mortgage lenders, so that would prove that registration process had began before the lessee died, and it should therefore continue to be registered, despite the new lessee’s objection, a good solicitor may be able to achieve this and may cost much more than to reach a compromise with the new lessee. on top of this it was the deceased lessee’s solicitor who should have pointed out to the new lessee or the Auction to have declared a pending task of DoV.
Member Since October 2022 - Comments: 403
9:01 AM, 23rd February 2025, About 1 year ago
The deceased was no longer the lessee at point of death. The solicitors instructed by executors or was the executor executed the deceased’s Will and realised the assets to pay off the mortgage on the lease and funeral costs.
The title and lease to the property was auctioned and assigned to the new purchaser. There’s no ‘should have’.
The new lessee purchased’as is’ and as a consumer under Consumer Rights Act is entitled to what was sold and now registered at HMLR and HMRC as the registered proprietor
Member Since November 2022 - Comments: 120
10:17 AM, 23rd February 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Mike at 23/02/2025 – 01:43
There was no mortgagee’s consent to the lessee’s DoV. Therefore it was ineffective. It’s as simple as that.