1 year ago | 5 comments
Nearly two-thirds of workers living in private rented housing struggle to pay their rent, a poll by Shelter reveals.
Only 32% of workers said they could keep up with rent payments without difficulty, with 40% sometimes struggling and 23% constantly struggling.
Also, 3% say they are falling behind on payments.
The poll figures have been published by the Guardian and have fuelled calls from businesses, unions and charities for Chancellor Rachel Reeves to invest billions in social housing.
They argue that increased social housing supply would alleviate pressure on the private rented sector (PRS), driving down prices.
Twenty-three business leaders, including Ikea UK’s Peter Jelkeby and Unite’s Sharon Graham, signed a letter to Ms Reeves urging her to invest up to £11.5 billion annually to build 90,000 new social rented homes.
The letter, printed by The Guardian, states: “As businesses, trade unions and third sector organisations, we have come together to express our concern about the devastating impact the chronic shortage of social housing is having on our society, our businesses, and our workforce and productivity.
“Worryingly, polling for Shelter reveals that two-thirds of working private renters, 4,450,000 people, are falling behind or struggling to pay their rent, showing the housing emergency the government inherited is only getting worse.
“As we enter 2025, we must get serious about ending the housing emergency that is holding our country and our economy back. Together, we are asking you to use the forthcoming spending review to invest in building 90,000 social rent homes a year for 10 years.
“Social rented housing is the only genuinely affordable housing by design, as rents are tied to local incomes. What’s more, history and research both show that without major social housing investment and a major boost to council housebuilding, the government cannot deliver its election promise to build 1.5m homes.”
Labour has pledged to build 1.5 million homes, including the loosening of planning rules.
However, campaigners emphasise the need for significant social housing investment to achieve this target.
A Shelter and National Housing Federation report found that building 90,000 social rented homes annually would cost £11.5 billion but generate returns within three years.
Ms Reeves will announce spending review allocations in June and while she has committed to raising social housing rents slightly above inflation, pressure is mounting to increase funding for the affordable homes programme.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
1 year ago | 5 comments
1 year ago | 9 comments
1 year ago | 2 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 1013
7:37 AM, 31st December 2024, About 1 year ago
Shelter, Generation Rent and all the other supposed housing charities need to own their part in driving up rents.
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1576
9:42 AM, 31st December 2024, About 1 year ago
It’s time that employers played a role in providing housing for their staff. It cannot be right that couples working a combined 60+ hours per week cannot afford to live nearer to their work. It’s also wrong that employers expect the taxpayer to subsidise their employees living costs through LHA.
Employers should move their work location or provide their staff with housing .
Member Since January 2020 - Comments: 1102 - Articles: 1
11:31 AM, 31st December 2024, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 31/12/2024 – 09:42
The trouble is that what you are advocating would require a total restructure of the benefit system and employment market, not to mention the abandonment of the concept of the welfare state.
The whole idea of in-work benefits linked to a low wage economy is bonkers but changes would be so far reaching that no government could be trusted to do it properly without causing economic chaos, even if they had the motivation and public support to do so.
I remember the days when employers would indeed provide housing, think of nurses homes in the grounds of the hospital and police houses, quite apart from factory owners who understood that their work force needed to be accommodated within easy travelling distance. One of the downsides is that individual choice and mobility of labour is restricted when your home is inextricably linked to your job.
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1576
11:37 AM, 31st December 2024, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Seething Landlord at 31/12/2024 – 11:31
It’s just crazy that staff have to commute into London so that they can serve unemployed people with their daily shopping. And the likes of Tesco get to pay minimum wage even in areas where the cost of living is so high.
Member Since January 2020 - Comments: 1102 - Articles: 1
12:01 PM, 31st December 2024, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 31/12/2024 – 11:37
I agree, but how do you resolve that problem without huge increases in the retail price of food and other essentials?
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1576
1:48 PM, 31st December 2024, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Seething Landlord at 31/12/2024 – 12:01
Let those that buy stuff in expensive areas pay the higher prices.