Summer Budget 2015 – Landlords Reactions
2:00 PM, 8th July 2015, 11 years ago
9619
Categories:
![]()
The concern is;
Budget proposals to “restrict finance cost relief to individual landlords”. 
To calculate the impact of this policy on your personal finances download this software
Tags:
Budget 2015 Campaign
Comments
Have Your Say
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
or
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 804
6:11 PM, 5th June 2016, About 10 years ago
Didn’t see this coming !!!
https://www.martinco.com/news/tenants_face_rent_rises_as_supply_of_rental_properties_falls-2624?utm_campaign=mac-news-section&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=30228647&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_Ohc_ifbVdafgHub2Dfpoz-jJOV8YEcvWEoY5J_wfji_wgFecCuADrAQVWnFBmAe2eWFpHWMpwQuHoNTL7HMJvB-5y5w&_hsmi=30228647
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2188 - Articles: 2
10:27 PM, 5th June 2016, About 10 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “NW Landlord” at “05/06/2016 – 18:11“:
You have something in common with George Osborne for he too did not foresee rent rises.
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 804
11:02 PM, 5th June 2016, About 10 years ago
Ha ha was being sarcastic sorry
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2188 - Articles: 2
5:42 AM, 6th June 2016, About 10 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “NW Landlord” at “05/06/2016 – 23:02“:
And I of course was being ironic. Poor old George does not seem to be able to foresee any of the real consequences of his decisions, he fiddles while landlords (and tenants) burn.
Member Since November 2015 - Comments: 374 - Articles: 8
7:51 AM, 7th June 2016, About 10 years ago
This is what Section 24 is really the product of:
http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/28871-2/
It’s nothing to do with first time buyers. That was just the gloss applied by the government to get it past the electorate.
Section 24 is a LAND GRAB driven by the lobbying of corporate donors to the Conservative Party. It is the product of big business working hand-in-glove with its representatives in government, to destroy small business at the ultimate expense of the end consumer: tenants.
Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 237 - Articles: 4
8:36 AM, 7th June 2016, About 10 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “Gareth Wilson” at “07/06/2016 – 07:51“:
And you just KNOW he’ll backtrack on that one!
Member Since November 2015 - Comments: 374 - Articles: 8
8:41 AM, 7th June 2016, About 10 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “James Fraser” at “07/06/2016 – 08:36“:
Oh yes! Gideon, Gaukey and Jimmy will shortly come running to the call of their paymasters.
Member Since August 2013 - Comments: 428
9:15 AM, 7th June 2016, About 10 years ago
“We are looking to invest hundreds of millions of pounds into new rental homes, designed specifically for the renting, which we will directly manage for many years to come. It is important that the Government does all it can to allow us and companies like us to build more homes.”
Why does anyone think that the arguments advanced in the letter do not apply equally to individual investors/landlords?
Member Since September 2016 - Comments: 2533 - Articles: 73
9:18 AM, 7th June 2016, About 10 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “Seething Landlord” at “07/06/2016 – 09:15“:
It’s a kind of selective blindness. They don’t offer any justification, as there is none.
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 804
9:19 AM, 7th June 2016, About 10 years ago
I really don’t think we know the extent of the plans for build to rent especially south and in major cities still fundamentally unfair to give them competitive advantage that’s why the JR will be key I think