Are councils acting illegally when telling tenants to stay put?

Are councils acting illegally when telling tenants to stay put?

12:15 PM, 3rd March 2023, About A year ago 102

Text Size

Are councils following the law when telling tenants to stay put when they are facing eviction to protect them? Or is the council simply kicking the can further down the road?

The simple answer is – no-one seems to know.

And this Property118 investigation highlights the confusion and mystery that surrounds the stance taken by all councils because it might be illegal.

There’s certainly no guidance that insists this is the correct action to take when landlords issue a section 21 notice to repossess their property.

Councils tell tenants to remain in their rented home

It’s common practice for councils to tell tenants to remain in their rented home when facing eviction – causing stress not just for the tenant but also for the landlord as they deal with the legal costs and complications.

The big question remains, is this action legal?

In the government’s Homelessness Code of Guidance, a person is classed as homeless if:

  • If they have no accommodation in the UK or elsewhere in the world
  • Live in a moving vehicle eg a mobile home, caravan or houseboat and you have nowhere lawfully to put it.
  • You can’t live at home because of violence/abuse or threats of violence or abuse which are likely to be carried out against you or someone else in your household.
  • You have been locked out of your home and you aren’t allowed back.

The Homelessness Code of Guidance also states a person is ‘threatened with homelessness’ if:

  • They are likely to become homeless within 56 days.
  • A person is also threatened with homelessness if a valid notice under section 21 of the Housing Act 1988 has been issued in respect of the only accommodation available for their occupation, and the notice will expire within 56 days.

The guidance says where applicants are threatened with homelessness councils must take reasonable steps to help prevent it from occurring.

The first step the guidance says: “Housing authorities should not consider it reasonable for an applicant to remain in occupation until eviction by a bailiff.”

This is printed out in black and white in the Homelessness Code of Guidance ­­– so why are councils still telling tenants to stay put?

‘The council is just kicking the can further down the road’

In what is known as ‘gatekeeping’, councils that are desperate to cut the numbers of homeless people on their books are unwilling to disqualify renters from council housing and have advised tenants who have been asked to move out to hang on until the very last minute – leaving homeowners who need to sell up or move in a costly limbo.

Paul Shamplina, the founder of Landlord Action, told us: “It’s a common practice that has always happened, it’s not only stressful for the tenant but it’s an extra expense for the landlord.

“Once the Section 21 notice is served and the two months expires, the tenant goes to the council, the council then says, “We’ve got nowhere for you to go.

“The council may say, ‘We might have to put you in temporary accommodation. The council will suggest you wait for the bailiff’s eviction letter which usually is about another four months from when they received the Section 21 notice.

“The council is just kicking the can further down the road.”

He added: “Council waiting lists in London range from 20 to 25 years. You might have 10,000-15,000 people on a waiting list and there are no properties.”

‘Authorities should not routinely be advising tenants to stay’

Brandon Lewis, the former Housing Minister, wrote to all councils in 2016 stating: “Authorities should not routinely be advising tenants to stay until the bailiffs arrive; there is no barrier to them assisting the tenant before this. By doing this, local authorities miss a valuable opportunity to prevent homelessness.”

Councils seem to not have listened to the advice given by the housing minister as the common practice still continues.

The National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) carried out research in 2016 which found that 49% of tenants who have been served with a section 21 notice by their private landlord say they have been told to ignore it by their local council.

A spokesperson for the NRLA said: “There really is no good excuse for local authorities to give ‘stay-put advice’ to tenants who have been served a valid notice.

“Local authorities who are still gatekeeping in this manner are generally doing so for one of two reasons.

“They are either misreading the Homelessness Code of Guidance, whereby they think that they cannot accept a tenant as homeless, or at risk of homelessness, until they are ordered to leave by the court. This is entirely wrong and was clarified by (then housing minister) Brandon Lewis in 2016.”

The spokesperson added the second reason was that councils have limited capacity for housing people who present as homeless.

They said: “Councils are trying to ration their increasingly limited capacity and resources to aid households in need by putting off helping them until the last possible moment, which is a false economy.

“Either way they are failing to help those in need of support and transferring the burden to private landlords who are in no position to shoulder the costs.”

‘Still best to stay in your home until the council accepts that you have to leave.’

The housing charity Shelter gives advice to private renters with assured shorthold tenancies on its website when facing Section 21 evictions.

The charity says: “The council might tell you to wait for bailiffs and that you’ll be intentionally homeless if you leave before then.

“This may not seem right if you will have rent arrears or court costs to pay off. But it’s still best to stay in your home until the council accepts that you have to leave.”

The advice goes on to say: If the council says you must wait for eviction by bailiffs, you can ask the council to:

  • Explain the situation to your landlord
  • Help with court costs or a rent shortfall
  • Provide help under your personal housing plan.

‘The duty to prevent’

The Local Government Association said: “Councils have a duty to ‘take reasonable steps to help the applicant to secure that accommodation does not cease to be available’ if they believe a household to be threatened with homelessness, otherwise known as the duty to prevent.

“The law specifically states that a household is indeed threatened with homelessness if they have been served with a valid section 21 notice seeking possession.

“Helping to secure does not mean that the authority has a duty to directly source and provide accommodation for the applicant, but they do have a duty to provide the household with a Personalised Housing Plan which will outline the steps both the council and the household can take to prevent homelessness.”

The association continued by saying placements into temporary accommodation can be upsetting for families and expensive for councils.

The spokesperson continued: “This measure may be taken by councils to try to prevent temporary accommodation use for as long as possible while other homelessness prevention tactics are implemented.

“Councils often have very high waiting lists for social housing, and with the private sector becoming more and more unfeasible for some households due to widening gaps between Local Housing Allowance (LHA) rates and market rents, alternative housing options are becoming more difficult to source for households approaching homelessness services.”

Tower Hamlets Council told Property118 that they ‘Follow all guidelines.”

London Councils, the local government association for Greater London, said they do not hold data on this issue and declined to comment.

Section 21 to be abolished

With the prospect that the Government looks set to end Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions, it appears that there will be more hassle for landlords and tenants.

Mr Shamplina says that ‘at the moment’ Section 21 is a good thing for tenants.

He explained: “There’s a lot of tenants out there that have been evicted under Section 21 when there is rent arrears but landlords don’t claim for the rent arrears on the court order because it doesn’t show. That means they can still try and rehoused by the council.

“When you abolish Section 21, more landlords are going to be forced down the rent arrears route and go down the Section 8 road because a lot of landlords write off rent arrears especially with housing benefit tenants because they weren’t going to get the money.”

He added: “If you’re forced to go down the Section 8 route then the money order shows up on the possession order. The council turns around to the tenant and says, ‘You haven’t paid your rent’ – you’ve made yourself homeless.”

Section 8 is a much lengthier process and, under this procedure, the landlord needs to go to court to regain possession where a tenant is in breach of their tenancy agreement.

But how will councils deal with this added pressure when they are already at limited capacity? Most importantly, if tenants can’t be re-housed by the council or get accommodation in the PRS what will happen to them?

Will councils start to take responsibility for this issue?

The one-million-dollar question is whether councils telling tenants to stay put is legal.

The short answer is we don’t know.

The Local Government Association says ‘Helping to secure does not mean that the authority has a duty to directly source and provide accommodation for the applicant’.

Liverpool City Council told us: “Each homeless application is assessed on its own individual circumstances, which will then inform what bespoke support can be provided to help manage that situation.

“Councils need time to determine that the landlord has followed the correct legal procedures.

“This means the tenant will often be advised to remain in the property until that has taken place.”

Tower Hamlets Council say they ‘follow the guidance’. They couldn’t tell us what that ‘guidance’ is.

Meanwhile, the NRLA argues that councils are misreading the Homelessness Code of Guidance.

The question is: Will councils start to take responsibility for this issue, or will they continue to ‘kick the can’ further down the road?

We are still waiting for a comment back from Brent Council and the Department for Levelling Housing and Communities.


Share This Article


Comments

Carchester

10:31 AM, 12th April 2023, About A year ago

Ruth
Before you engage the legal mafiosi I would suggest you contact Worthing council and request (demand) that they provide you with "the legal authority for their proposition or advice" to wait for the bailiffs.
Do not back off if they fail to provide you with it (there is none by the way). Once you have made this request and with no legal response from WC you can then provide your efforts to your solicitor.
Use the exact words as in brackets above - good legal words.
Good luck.

Cath Burns

11:05 AM, 15th April 2023, About A year ago

Reply to the comment left by xBrito at 03/03/2023 - 13:17
I am currently in the same boat - tenants were meant to move out on 30 Jan! I was told they would be provided with somewhere else and they were top of the list! The latest is they have until 28 April but I have in writing from Bristol city council housing team that they are likely to be told to wait for bailiffs.

The knock on effect is that this is going to cost me over £10K additional costs to sell my property - I now have to remortgage on 1 June (property would have been sold by then if tenants had left) so will be paying at least £500 more in mortgage payments plus will now also have to pay redemption penalties when we sell.

Would love to do a legal challenge - has anyone done this yet?

Abraham George

16:37 PM, 27th April 2023, About 12 months ago

As a landlord never trust the UK law and the inefficient County Court judjes to serve you justice in time ! Unless you have local clout to look after your property from rogue Tenants its better to liquidate your rental properties and invest in physical gold in a safe place or invest in dividend yielding blue chip shares !
Gone are days of lawful tenancy in the UK and Landlords will only get stress , sleepless nights and monetary loss going forwards !

Ma'at Housing Solutions

13:32 PM, 10th May 2023, About 11 months ago

Firstly as an ex local authority housing & homelessness officer, I apologize to all private landlords who have been subjected to this immoral and unlawful practice on the part of Councils!
This horrendous and costly practice is a primary reason that I eventually ceased working in those toxic, inept and discriminatory statutory service provider! In my naiveté as a new council housing options officer, I saw the beautiful benefits of establishing good professional relationships with all PRS landlords and letting/ estate agencies alike. It was a no-brainer I thought, protecting our private landlords and being a point of contact for them to address any tenant/ tenancy issues as early as possible to keep both landlord and tenants happy.
Unfortunately my naiveté quickly evaporated when I saw the perverse 'power' some colleagues and especially managers enjoyed displaying to both tenants, landlords and those at risk of homelessness who sought advice or assistance...
As a result, I developed wonderful relations with Landlords and colleagues and customers were aware that I would always try to assist and secure the best possible outcome for all parties.
It made me unpopular with 'perverse' colleagues, on more occasions than I care to recall resulted in me being in the office 'til after midnight to finalize a placement for a vulnerable person or family and eventually almost led to a nervous breakdown!
So here I am now taking the advice of countless clients and landlords over the years and finally setting up my own independent housing advisory service!
It is unconscionable that local authorities housing/ homeless teams can subject landlords to unnecessary stress and expenditure as well as tenants when all they need to do is to COMPLY with HRA 2017 , HA 1996( part VII) and Their 'Bible' the Code of Guidance!

Carchester

13:49 PM, 10th May 2023, About 11 months ago

Fine comment. However, the reality is that LA's should not be meddling in the affairs of PSLs except in Statutory & Regulatory matters.

Their honchoes (SHELTER) must never be allowed to be "on the record". They have no jurisdiction in matters between Landlords and tenants. They are parasitic.

If the Court orders a rogue tenant to quit upon any particular day or date then the
Court Order must be obeyed - unless subject to appeal.

Ma'at Housing Solutions

14:18 PM, 10th May 2023, About 11 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Carchester at 10/05/2023 - 13:49
Thank you for your comment. However I am not the enemy!

Tony Phillips

22:17 PM, 13th May 2023, About 11 months ago

Reply to the comment left by DGM at 03/03/2023 - 16:04
I've rented out the flat below my home for three decades and never had a problem. Now I am threatened with draconian fines for breaching any of around 50 odd conditions of my licence. Which were introduced to stop rouge LL's? Bulls**t it's nothing more that a stealth tax. Most are common sense but some are ridiculous. Like having to give a receipt for rent?

The tenant has a bank statement and so do I. They know they paid, I know they paid and so does the bank! So WTF do I need to give a written receipt???

Another condition is I have to give the tenant, the councils rules and regs on waste disposal?? WtF!! ...and the list goes on.

I would happily crowd fund a legal action against councils. I hate them with a passion.

...rant over ...and breathe! 😉

Tony Phillips

22:29 PM, 13th May 2023, About 11 months ago

Reply to the comment left by JamesB at 05/03/2023 - 09:50
And these morons don't get why rents are going up and there are no rental properties!! Couldn't make it up!

Adrianne Major

9:48 AM, 14th May 2023, About 11 months ago

If someone would setup a crowd funding page to fund legal action against councils who do not comply with HRA 2017 etc and insist on ‘waiting for bailiffs’ I would be very happy to contribute. I am in this situation already, a lovely tenant, but I need to sell. Husband 80 and not well!

Ma'at Housing Solutions

10:08 AM, 15th May 2023, About 11 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Cath Burns at 15/04/2023 - 11:05
So sorry you are being subjected to this appalling but all too common practice by local authorities!
Hope you have managed to resolve the situation without the horrendous costs implications you mentioned?
The only way to challenge this is to either: A) State you need to move into the property or B) Challenge the housing team on their failure to comply with the 'Duty to Prevent and/ or ' Duty to Relieve' the impending homelessness of the tenant as per the requirements of HRA 2017: the Homeless Reduction Act 2017.
Good luck 👍

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now