Angela Rayner: Police reveal investigation into council house row

Angela Rayner: Police reveal investigation into council house row

11:54 AM, 12th April 2024, About a month ago 27

Text Size

Greater Manchester Police (GMP) has revealed that investigations are underway into Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy leader, following allegations of electoral law breaches.

The police had previously dismissed the need for an inquiry into accusations that she had given false address information.

But a report in The Times yesterday revealed that police had still not spoken with neighbours over Ms Rayner’s version of events over where she was living.

The focus of the police investigation is whether Ms Rayner registered an incorrect property on the electoral roll.

This inquiry is separate from any potential tax law violations, which would fall under the jurisdiction of HMRC.

Police investigation into Ms Rayner

The reopening of the police investigation into Ms Rayner follows a complaint by James Daly, deputy chairman of the Tory party.

A GMP spokesperson said: “We’re investigating whether any offences have been committed. This follows a reassessment of the information provided to us by Mr Daly.”

Ms Rayner has denied any wrongdoing and has received support from Labour leader, Sir Keir Starmer.

A Labour spokesperson said: “Angela welcomes the chance to set out the facts with the police.

“We remain completely confident that Angela has complied with the rules at all times and it’s now appropriate to let the police do its work.”

May have avoided capital gains tax

The initial accusation came from an unauthorised biography of Ms Rayner by Tory peer Lord Ashcroft which suggested that she may have avoided capital gains tax when selling her former council house in 2015.

That property was registered as her main address on the electoral roll.

But that raised questions about her living arrangements, particularly after the re-registration of her two youngest children’s births.

They were registered at her husband’s separate address shortly after their marriage in 2010.

Ms Rayner has stated that she consulted with tax experts to ensure she did not owe tax but has chosen not to publish the advice she received.

Mr Starmer has backed her, stating he does not need to see the tax advice and accusing the Tories of ‘chasing a smear’ against her.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak earlier this week called for both Mr Starmer and Ms Rayner to provide ‘straight’ answers about her tax affairs.

He said that many people, including the deputy Labour leader, had asked him ‘lots of questions’ about his tax affairs.

Grant Shapps levels ‘double standards’ charge at Ms Rayner

The defence secretary Grant Shapps has levelled a charge of ‘double standards’ at Angela Rayner, expressing his approval of the police inquiry into the Labour deputy leader.

He pointed out that Ms Rayner has ‘spent her political career calling people out’ and insisted on transparency – yet she has not demonstrated the same level of openness in relation to the allegations against her.

Despite her previous insistence that a Tory candidate disclose their tax return, Ms Rayner has declined to make public the tax advice she obtained regarding the sale of her council house.

Speaking to the media this morning, Mr Shapps said: “I think the double standards have been extraordinary.

“Angela Rayner herself has spent her political career calling people out for exactly the thing that she seems to be doing now.

“It’s not acceptable to ignore it, and it’s not acceptable for Keir Starmer to say he won’t even read reports into it.

“This is something which is a serious matter. It’s important that it’s looked into properly and I welcome the idea that the police are doing that.”

Starmer says police investigation will bring closure

Labour leader, Sir Keir Starmer, has stated that the police investigation into Angela Rayner’s council house sale will enable closure on the issue.

He expressed his full confidence that Ms Rayner had not violated any rules.

Mr Starmer said: “We welcome this investigation because it will allow a line to be drawn in relation to this matter.

“I am fully confident that Angela Rayner has not broken the rules.

“She will cooperate with the investigation as you would expect, and it is really a matter for the police.”

Sadiq Khan and Ed Miliband rally behind Angela Rayner

London mayor Sadiq Khan has expressed his full confidence in 0Angela Rayner, whom he refers to as his ‘best friend’, and that she will be exonerated in a police investigation.

Mr Khan said: “I’m fully confident in Angela, she’s one of my best friends and I’m sure she’ll be cleared.”

Echoing this sentiment, Ed Miliband, the shadow energy minister, said: “We are absolutely 100% behind Angela.

“We are absolutely confident that she has complied with the rules.”

What are the consequences of breaking electoral law?

If an individual declines to provide information to an Electoral Registration Officer, or provides incorrect information, specific penalties may be enforced.

The rules specify that any individual who does not comply or provides incorrect information may be subject to a summary conviction and a fine not exceeding £1,000.

In cases where the offence is not considered severe enough for a criminal conviction, civil penalties may also be levied.


Share This Article


Comments

Lyndsey Jones

23:41 PM, 13th April 2024, About a month ago

Pretty clear that she is disliked but all this fuss over £1500? Mistake or not if she’s found guilty she will face the music like we all would in that position. But have the police not got bigger fish to fry in the world of MP misappropriation?

Monty Bodkin

10:15 AM, 14th April 2024, About a month ago

Reply to the comment left by Lyndsey Jones at 13/04/2024 - 23:41
"all this fuss over £1500?"

She is the shadow housing minister FFS!

GlanACC

12:30 PM, 14th April 2024, About a month ago

Not really the police that should be investigating this, if they can do this why don't they investigate all fraud crimes. She is only doing what a lot of us (and probably have) done - its all political posturing

Lyndsey Jones

12:46 PM, 14th April 2024, About a month ago

Reply to the comment left by Monty Bodkin at 14/04/2024 - 10:15
So why not more fuss over other tax dodging mp’s? Ffs 🙄

Monty Bodkin

14:03 PM, 14th April 2024, About a month ago

Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 14/04/2024 - 12:30
"She is only doing what a lot of us (and probably have) done"

I don't know precisely what she has done but if you mean avoided paying CGT and by "us" you mean landlords posting on here, then I don't think a lot of us have done it. It would be a stupid thing to do.

I accept the average person may have made a mistake but I would expect any shadow housing minister to make themselves fully aware and put their hands up straight away if they've made a past mistake.

Stella

15:17 PM, 14th April 2024, About a month ago

Reply to the comment left by Monty Bodkin at 14/04/2024 - 14:03
What is good for the goose is also good for the gander.
As Ms Rayner has on several occassions called for others to resign and show their tax returns even before they were found guilty of any crime then surely this presents her with a golden opportunity as Deputy Leader of the labour party to demonstrate how this should be done.

KD South East

22:52 PM, 14th April 2024, About a month ago

Police don't even come out for burglaries these days, but they are wasting time on political point scoring.
I wonder if there will be a criminal investigation into the millions (or is it billions) wasted in the PPE scandal etc

Monty Bodkin

9:39 AM, 15th April 2024, About a month ago

Reply to the comment left by KD South East at 14/04/2024 - 22:52
Classic Whataboutery!

Cider Drinker

9:44 AM, 15th April 2024, About a month ago

Many of us have avoided tax whether it is by not declaring some income or other or paying cash to avoid VAT.

Many of us have done it. Me included however, as a result, I wouldn’t consider myself as a suitable candidate for a Ministerial position in government.

Lyndsey Jones

10:24 AM, 15th April 2024, About a month ago

Reply to the comment left by Cider Drinker at 15/04/2024 - 09:44
If ministerial suitability was based on that we wouldn’t have any MPs

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now