4 months ago | 21 comments
As a single property landlord who lives a fair distance from my property. I am heavily reliant on the letting agent to find suitable contractors for jobs at my property.
A prime example involved a staircase handrail, which was to be moved to the opposite side of the stairs and repainted. The letting agent informed me that the work had been completed and that the contractor had been paid.
I was due to pass near the property, which coincided with a planned property check by the letting agent and the tenants agreed for me to attend.
Looking round, it was obvious that the work had not been carried out. I took numerous photos, and the letting agent was profusely sorry, but she did not work in that office and was only covering.
It took months to get the money back from the letting agent, and I told them that the contractor was banned from my property.
It seemed to me that there is no oversight on the contractors, and one has to trust them when they inform the letting agent what work needs to be done and that the work has been carried out.
What degree, if any, of oversight is there regarding the amount contractors claim and whether the work is carried out to a high standard?
Thanks,
Tom
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
BR Investments: The trade most landlords never considerSorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 196
11:12 AM, 13th April 2026, About 1 hour ago
This is just one reason that I stopped using agents for anything.
I live remotely from one of my properties, but I have a list of reliable contractors who do the work and send me photographic evidence before they expect payment. If you really want to continue using an agent, then they should do the same