Labour peer in storm over tenant removal and rent hike

Labour peer in storm over tenant removal and rent hike

Eviction notice highlighting landlord dispute over rising rents
12:01 AM, 16th September 2025, 7 months ago 5

Labour has been drawn into another rented home row after one of its biggest donors, Lord Waheed Alli, removed a family from his London property before it was put back on the market at a much higher rent.

The Islington townhouse, a five-bedroom former residence of the peer, had been home to a family of five for four years at £4,800 a month.

In June, they were issued with a section 21 notice.

However, shortly afterwards the property appeared online for £5,850 per month and was eventually re-let for £5,700, still nearly £1,000 more than the previous tenants were paying.

Disappointed to vote Labour

The father of the displaced family told the i newspaper they had offered to match the new rent to avoid upheaval for their children, who were preparing for exams.

He added they pleaded to stay for one extra month but were refused, describing the situation as ‘incredibly disappointing’.

He also criticised the peer’s political ties, saying: “The hypocrisy just feels like too much … I voted Labour and I’m just incredibly disappointed.”

‘Another example of rank hypocrisy’

Mr Alli, a media entrepreneur with an estimated fortune of £200 million, has donated than £500,000 to Labour in recent years.

He has also gifted items worth tens of thousands of pounds to Sir Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner.

He has also allowed the party leader temporary use of his multimillion-pound penthouse.

Conservatives seized on the case, pointing to Labour’s pledge to end ‘no-fault’ evictions.

Party chairman Kevin Hollinrake called the situation “yet another example of rank hypocrisy whereby a Labour peer is engaging in the very practices his party’s legislation seeks to prevent”.

Not generous to tenants

Shadow housing secretary Sir James Cleverly said: “This is another example of Labour saying one thing and doing another.”

Housing campaigners also condemned the handling of the case.

Ben Twomey, the chief executive of Generation Rent, said: “Lord Alli has shown real generosity to his own party as a major donor, yet evicting families and using practises that are about to be banned shows that same generosity doesn’t extend to his tenants.”

A spokesperson for Mr Alli insisted he had no role in the eviction process.

The controversy echoes last month’s resignation of homelessness minister Rushanara Ali, who faced similar criticism after tenants were removed from her east London property before it was relisted at a higher rent.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1431 - Articles: 1

    10:24 AM, 16th September 2025, About 7 months ago

    Petition the King and the Leader of the House to remove his peerage. Simple.

  • Member Since August 2023 - Comments: 6

    10:51 AM, 16th September 2025, About 7 months ago

    Rather than just requesting extra time he should have just stayed until it suited him to leave. Courts take ages and if he was genuinely only needing a couple of months he could easily have used the system to get it. Mind you if you’ve got nearly £60 grand a year I doubt you’d be getting much sympathy from the usual suspects.

  • Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1630 - Articles: 3

    11:23 AM, 16th September 2025, About 7 months ago

    Islington Champagne socialists get evicted by Champagne socialist. Hurts when if affects them, eh?

    Where’s Shelter when they need them?

  • Member Since February 2018 - Comments: 627

    11:34 AM, 16th September 2025, About 7 months ago

    ‘one extra month’.

    So the issue doesn’t appear to be the issuance of a S21/ ending the tenancy, it sounds as though the tenant was going to leave anyway ‘in a month’s time’, ‘they had offered to match the new rent to avoid upheaval for their children, who were preparing for exams’. I can’t see any landlord ejecting a longterm tenant willing to pay a 20% uplift (when was the last increase?) if they were actually intending to stay, it just sounds like a grouse where negotiations have failed to come to agreement, personally, I’d try to accommodate but there might be an undisclosed reason why that didn’t happen.

  • Member Since June 2014 - Comments: 1562

    11:35 AM, 16th September 2025, About 7 months ago

    “The father of the displaced family told the i newspaper they had offered to match the new rent”

    So it wasn’t just about the rent?

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles