1 year ago | 1 comments
Members of the House of Lords warn that the court system could be left in limbo, with landlords facing long delays.
The Telegraph previously revealed that landlords are already struggling with eviction delays of more than eight months, and there are growing concerns that the Renters’ Rights Bill will only make the situation worse.
According to the Telegraph, the Labour government plans to digitise the County Court process in an effort to reduce pressure on the courts.
In the third debate of the Committee stage of the Renters’ Rights Bill, Lords raised concerns over the court digitisation process, arguing it could take up to five years before the system is fully functional.
Despite these concerns, Baroness Taylor of Stevenage argued that the Renters’ Rights Bill will better balance the rights of tenants and landlords.
In the third debate of the Committee Stage, Lord Cromwell raised the point that he and other House of Lords members attended a meeting regarding court digitisation, which he claims was “hailed as a techno magic that will speed up the court process.”
However, he says many Lords members who attended were left doubtful over whether the process would work.
He said: “This was illuminating, but it left attendees, a good number of whom have very considerable experience of our legal system, very doubtful about this still-evolving IT system. The view from the people I spoke to was that it would take at least five years to bed in.”
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage says the government is working hard to make sure the courts are ready.
She told the debate: “His Majesty’s Courts & Tribunals Service is building an end-to-end digital service for resolving all possession claims in the county courts in England and Wales, to make processes more efficient and easier to understand for landlords and tenants, a much-needed reform.
“Funding has been agreed and provided to enable the design and build of this new service, which is well under way and builds on the existing digitisation of the justice system.”
Baroness Scott says the Conservative Renters (Reform) Bill had safeguards to protect the court system, making sure that Section 21 would only be abolished when the courts were ready.
However, she says these safeguards under the Renters’ Rights Bill “are now gone,” and there is no phased rollout.
She warns that the courts need reform before the abolition of Section 21 takes place. Baroness Scott pointed out the courts’ long backlog, where “many landlords wait months, not weeks, just for a simple hearing.”
Lord Young of Cookham pointed out that many possession cases take over seven months, “which leaves landlords with no income.”
He added that tenants who genuinely need housing are left in a “state of limbo” and “will be unable to access the market, because the homes that they might move into are unavailable and tied up in legal delays.”
Baroness Scott adds the Renters’ Rights Bill needs more than good intentions to work in reality.
She said: “The ambition of the Renters’ Rights Bill is commendable, but ambition alone is not enough.
“We must also confront the operational realities. This legislation will place significant demands on our already stretched courts and tribunals system. If we press ahead without ensuring that the system is properly resourced, modernised and fully functional, we risk undermining the very objectives that the Bill sets out to achieve.
“Tenants and landlords alike need a process they can trust: one that is timely, fair and accessible. Without that, this reform will falter at the first hurdle.”
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage claims the Renters’ Rights Bill will do a better job than the Conservatives’ Renters (Reform) Bill in balancing the rights of landlords and tenants.
She said: “It was too late, when the party opposite recognised the dreadful housing crisis that it had led us into, which meant it was too late for it to finish legislation to deal with it.
“This government will take up the challenge of dealing with the issues with a degree of balance between landlords and renters and, I believe, will do a better job of it.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Just 20% of PRS homes are below the Decent Homes Standard
1 year ago | 1 comments
12 months ago | 18 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since February 2020 - Comments: 360
9:43 AM, 2nd May 2025, About 12 months ago
To be honest if the court system was digitised in 5 years, its not ideal but I would be happy that its actually done.
Software projects are not straight forward. They always take longer than you think if the timeline is 5 years, it might take 10 or longer.
Think of that NHS system that costs billions that was scrapped.
In the meanwhile the current eviction process is not fit for purpose.
Member Since December 2013 - Comments: 179
2:11 PM, 2nd May 2025, About 12 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Downsize Government at 02/05/2025 – 09:43
And consider the Universal Credit IT systems too. How long did that take?…. Started it in 2013? And it’s still an ‘un-userfriendly’ and flawed today.
Member Since July 2023 - Comments: 181
7:45 PM, 2nd May 2025, About 12 months ago
At risk of only adding more of the same.
5 years is fantasy land.
‘They’ don’t want it to work.
Loads of genuine evictions (no right to social housing).
All in a few weeks.
Chaos.
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2203 - Articles: 2
8:49 AM, 3rd May 2025, About 12 months ago
The courts have had since 1215 (Magna Carta) to get a manual system in place, which they have failed to do, at least in a manner which gives speedy justice. Does anyone really think that they can implement a digital system in five years?
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1590
9:44 AM, 3rd May 2025, About 12 months ago
If someone leases a car and fails to make payment, how long does it take for the leasing company to regain possession of the car? It should be the same process for housing.
Miss a payment and you should receive a written warning, copied to the local authority. Miss a second payment and bailiffs should evict you.
The property becomes available for a family in temporary housing and the displaced family moves into the local authority’s temporary housing.
No need for a court. Tenant cannot prove payment of two months’ rent = eviction.
Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 1506
7:39 AM, 5th May 2025, About 12 months ago
As a retired software developer, a bespoke court system for replacing S21’s and S8’s etc could easily be done if the system was designed and coded onshore in the UK – I reckon 2 years maximum – the proviso is that the system is built by a private company and NOT government led. Plenty of UK companies that could do this – eg. the credit checking companies who already have vast databases on people.
From previous experience, the issues arise when the system is coded abroad (India etc) and so much time is wasted checking the quality of the code and rectification due to ‘misunderstandings’.
A bit of onshore Agile development and could easily be done in 2 years. My worry is the government procurement process and bidding could take 2 years before anything is started.