7 months ago | 9 comments
by Kevin Shaw
The government’s consultation on Home Buying and Selling reform is a step in the right direction. It recognises what every estate agent and conveyancer already knows: property sales take too long and fall through too often resulting in considerable frustration and abortive costs.
I welcome the ambition to shorten the 120-day average transaction time by around four weeks. The proposed solution is bold, but achievable, given the proliferation of “proptech” which if coordinated will support it.
At LRG, we already operate a number of processes that are in alignment with the consultation’s aims, so we’ve seen first-hand how, for example, how early information, digital tools and clearer workflows can help make the system faster, fairer and less stressful for everyone.
That said, it’s important to recognise that reforms of this scale invariably come with trade-offs. Some stages of the process will inevitably take longer initially, and not all agents will adapt at the same speed unless they are made mandatory from the onset.
One of the central proposals is that sellers provide key information (lease details, service charges, ground rent and title data) upfront, before a sale is agreed. Unpleasant surprises are a significant factor in sales falling through and identifying those issues earlier in the process ultimately benefits both buyers and sellers.
We’ve already addressed the streamlining of material information requirements by partnering with a number of businesses, including Kotini. This digital platform brings together material information quickly and efficiently, and currently approximately 75% of clients complete the required forms (including TA6 and TA7) within three days.
Up front transparency reduces speculative activity, creating a market of committed vendors.
Some of the criticism of the proposed reforms is based upon Home Information Packs (HIPs) of almost 20 years ago. HIPs failed not because the concept was wrong, but because the technology wasn’t ready. Sellers were asked to spend hundreds of pounds compiling documents that often went out of date before a sale was agreed, forcing them to pay again.
Today, digital platforms provide a cheaper and more efficient means of supplying this information.
We’ve found that digitisation also improves cash flow and productivity.
Faster completions mean fewer stalled chains, less wasted time and healthier businesses. In that sense, what’s good for consumers can also be good for the industry.
There is a risk that smaller independent agents or conveyancers could face higher upfront costs in adopting new systems. But in the long term, competition among software providers will drive prices down and the efficiency savings will more than offset the initial investment.
Even if the reforms are fully implemented, they will not be a panacea.
Local authority search delays remain a real constraint in some areas, (although digital communication is improving access) and lenders’ underwriting panels and surveyor capacity can also slow progress, especially during busy periods.
We must also be realistic that these changes won’t affect every type of transaction equally.
Simpler freehold sales and new-build properties will see the greatest benefit; rural properties, leaseholds and managed estates may still take longer because of the volume and complex nature of information involved.
But that’s no reason to delay reform. The market will move faster overall, and the gains will compound over time as systems integrate and users adapt.
Of course, all of this sits against the wider backdrop of fiscal policy.
We’re in something of a phoney war at the moment, anticipating the November’s Budget. In reality, the Chancellor’s decision on property taxation will determine whether these positive reforms land in a buoyant or a subdued market.
But long term, the direction of travel proposed in this consultation is right.
A system that rewards preparedness, transparency and professionalism is one that benefits everyone involved.
Kevin Shaw is the National Sales Managing Director at LRG.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
7 months ago | 9 comments
1 month ago | 2 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since March 2025 - Comments: 6
8:04 PM, 10th April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
While this sounds good in principle I am concerned that there will be multiple bits of kit that don’t talk to each other. I can’t even get my doctor’s surgery to link up with my hospital records, because they use different systems, which I would consider to be comparable to a property system.
Member Since July 2014 - Comments: 59
8:17 PM, 10th April 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by Justin Waite at 10/04/2026 – 20:04
Agreed. Inevitably it will become another nightmare hassle!
Member Since November 2018 - Comments: 49
12:26 AM, 13th April 2026, About 2 weeks ago
It doesn’t matter how prepared you are because solicitors will always delay things by asking, sometimes stupid, questions. They do this to justify their ridicules fees.
I sold a house to my daughter. I had absolutely every detail sorted up front so they asked 2 non issues and delayed us for 6 weeks unnecessarily. She’d been renting it for a year so obviously knew all about the house.
They picked my electric cert apart until I pointed out that the issues they wanted sorting, before I could sell the house, to my own daughter, where actually minor recommendations marked with a green tick in the report. Not only that, it’s not even required to sell owner occupied properties. I was selling, not letting. I’ve bought houses with a broken boiler, no building regs etc. They can’t stop a sale because these things aren’t available, otherwise how would anyone be able to buy a doer upper? As long as you’re aware of what you’re buying, that’s all that’s required. My daughter was obviously knew exactly what she was buying.
They also insisted on a boiler serving report until I pointed them in the direction of the GasSafe website that doesn’t require such a thing. Although i did give them the landlord Gas cert. NOT required to sell a house. I actually replaced the boiler during the sale process but didn’t let them know because it would have caused more delays.
It’s my own daughter ffs if anything goes wrong it would be me that sorts it out anyway.
They even cased problems regarding handing over the keys and moving stuff etc. I said if they really wanted, I’d go on the day so the tenant could hand the keys over to me and them hand them back to her as the owner. Mental! But I said we wouldn’t be moving her stuff out and in again. We both made it very clear all the way through that I selling to my daughter who was currently renting it. It was insane.
It absolutely doesn’t matter how much information you have upfront they will continue to delay to justify charging so much. We paid more than 3k in fees between us.
We pay ridiculous money and they don’t even know the basics. They absolutely do not deserve their professional fees if they don’t know rules about gas and electric. I had a professional career, I’d have been totally humiliated if someone had pointed out the basics to me in the way i did.