The twelve-month re-let ban starts the day you post the notice, not the day the tenant leaves

Calendar and crossed-out 12-month re-let sign illustrating Ground 1A restrictions for landlords selling a property.
8:07 AM, 25th August 2026, 7 days ago 15

There is a piece of arithmetic that a lot of landlords planning a sale this autumn have not done, and I keep running into it.

Everyone knows that using Ground 1 or Ground 1A locks you out of the lettings market for twelve months.

Almost nobody agrees on when that clock starts and stops. I have read four guides giving four different answers. Only one matched the law.

When the clock starts and stops

The restricted period begins on the day the notice is served, and ends twelve months after the date written in the notice as the earliest date court proceedings can begin (section 16M(4) of the Housing Act 1988, inserted by the Renters’ Rights Act 2025).

Both halves matter. The start is service. Not expiry, not the hearing, not the day the keys come back. The moment the notice goes out, you are inside the restricted period. And the end is measured from the date in the notice, which must be at least four months after service. So the real exposure is four months plus twelve.

Take a tenancy that began on 1 June 2026. Ground 1A cannot be used inside the first year, so the earliest workable date to put in the notice is around the end of May 2027, which means serving at the end of January 2027. The restricted period then runs until late May 2028. That is sixteen months from the day you post the envelope during which you cannot re-let, licence for money, or advertise the property to let. Skip the notice and plead the ground straight in a claim form, and you get twelve months from the date the claim is filed instead.

You do not need to win for it to bite

The restriction is triggered by relying on the ground, not by succeeding on it. The Act says the prohibition continues “whether or not the tenancy continues”.

Read that twice. Serve Ground 1A, then think better of it. Serve it, and the tenant digs in. Serve it, and the judge is not convinced you genuinely intend to sell. In every one of those cases the tenant is still there, you have no possession, and you still cannot market the property to let for the rest of the period. In my view this is the most under-appreciated rule in the whole Act.

It gets worse. An invalid or informal notice counts too, and GOV.UK confirms that can include a text or WhatsApp message. A message saying “I am selling, you need to be out by Christmas” can start a restricted period on a property you then cannot re-let.

What is banned, and what is not

During the restricted period you cannot re-let, cannot let anyone occupy for money under a licence, and cannot advertise the property to let. Marketing is defined widely enough to catch an agent mentioning to an applicant that the property may be coming up. The portals are off the hook for hosting adverts supplied by others. You and your agent are not.

You can still do what the ground is for: market the property for sale, sell it, or grant a lease longer than twenty one years, and you can give your buyer a licence to move in ahead of completion. Family can move in rent free, because the ban only catches lettings and paid licences. But do not grant them a tenancy. The family letting exception belongs to Ground 1, the moving-in ground, not Ground 1A, whatever GOV.UK’s more generous summary suggests.

There is also an escape hatch almost nobody mentions. If the court later gives you possession on a different ground, the restriction ends that day. So if the tenant stays put, stops paying, and you get possession for serious arrears on Ground 8, the re-let bar drops away immediately.

Who pays, and how much

The rules bind you and anyone acting for you. Your letting agent is on the hook alongside you; your solicitor is not. Acting through an agent neither cures nor excuses a breach, and where the landlord is a company, directors can be personally liable, even for plain neglect in the case of the re-letting offence.

Re-letting or marketing during the period is a criminal offence, and the council can instead fine you up to £40,000. Lesser breaches run to £7,000. Serving a notice on a ground you know, or suspect, you cannot make out is a separate offence if the tenant then leaves within four months without a court order. And rent repayment orders now reach both offences, up to two years of rent. On a £1,400 a month property, that is £33,600 on top of whatever the council does.

One more thing. GOV.UK suggests a landlord who took “all reasonable steps” has a defence to re-letting. On the wording of the Act (section 16J(2)), that defence belongs only to someone other than the landlord, and only for marketing. As I read it, a landlord who re-lets has no reasonable steps defence at all. I would be glad to be told I am reading it too strictly, but that is how the words fall.

One correction worth making

I keep seeing it said that Ground 1A cannot be used for any tenancy that began before 1 May 2026. That is wrong. The carve-out in the transitional regulations (regulation 5 of SI 2026/421) only removes Ground 1A for the older style of assured tenancy that was never a shorthold. Ordinary ASTs converted on 1 May, and Ground 1A is available for them in the normal way.

The practical takeaway

Treat serving a Ground 1A notice as a decision to take that property off the lettings market for roughly sixteen months, whatever happens next. Instruct the estate agent and engage the conveyancer first. Do not serve to test the water.

And keep the file: the date of service, the date in the notice, the evidence you intended to sell at that date, and a record of what was and was not advertised. If a council comes asking in eighteen months, the paperwork is the whole defence.

A partnership with Property118

Property118 and LLCR have agreed a partnership for this community.

Property118 reader signup click here

Discount code: PROPERTY118, giving a 10% lifetime reduction on Starter and Pro plans, monthly or annual.

Two free tools that may help in the meantime, with no account needed: the compliance checker, and the Form 4A rent increase generator.

Have you served a Ground 1 or 1A notice yet, and did your agent flag the sixteen-month arithmetic before you did? I would be interested to hear whether anyone has had a council make contact about a restricted period, because I have not seen a reported case yet.

Tauhid Islam is a property law paralegal qualifying as a solicitor. He works on tenancy, possession, and compliance matters daily, and founded LLCR, Landlord Compliance Register, to give self-managing landlords and letting agents in England a single place to track every deadline, certificate, and document the law requires of them.

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It describes the position in England. Always seek independent legal advice for your specific situation.


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since August 2026 - Comments: 12

    9:09 AM, 25th August 2026, About 6 days ago

    You’re right about the start date, but the notice isn’t the only clock. Section 16M(4)(b) runs a separate twelve months from the day the claim form is filed, so serve in September, dither, issue in March, and you’re banned until the following March rather than twelve months from the date in the notice.

    The other direction is more cheerful. Under 16M(7), if the court gives you possession on some other ground before the restricted period ends, the ban ends the day the order is made. Arrears case that started life as a Ground 1A notice, and you’re free.

  • Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 939

    9:38 AM, 25th August 2026, About 6 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by [email protected] at 25/08/2026 – 09:09
    Interesting, but I am now confused. I have recently been informed that I can serve notice in advance of the final date. If I gave the tenants 8 months notice, could I theoretically then re-let after a further four months?

  • Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1333

    10:02 AM, 25th August 2026, About 6 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Paul Essex at 25/08/2026 – 09:38
    I believe that I this case the re-let period would begin 12 months after your notice expires

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 562

    4:03 PM, 25th August 2026, About 6 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Paul Essex at 25/08/2026 – 09:38
    But the tenant could than give two months notice.

  • Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 939

    5:34 PM, 25th August 2026, About 6 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Ian Ringrose at 25/08/2026 – 16:03
    If the tenant then gave notice, surely the year would be cancelled?

  • Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1333

    5:39 PM, 25th August 2026, About 6 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Paul Essex at 17:34
    No the 12 months min ban still applies if the tenant gives notice. Once you serve a ground 1A or ground 1 notice there’s no going back unless you can get them out on rent arrears or ASB or something.

  • Member Since August 2026 - Comments: 1

    10:07 AM, 26th August 2026, About 5 days ago

    Bottom line.
    Being a landlord, is a criminal offence or not?
    Your property but you have no flexibility

  • Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2300 - Articles: 2

    11:34 AM, 26th August 2026, About 5 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Geri Doc at 10:07
    Every mistake a landlord makes, no matter how trivial, is a criminal offece. Every mistake a tenat makes, no matter how major, is a civil offence. I believe it is only a matter of time before a landlord is jailed for something his tenant has done.

  • Member Since April 2026 - Comments: 16 - Articles: 13

    3:17 PM, 26th August 2026, About 5 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by [email protected] at 25/08/2026 – 09:09
    Thank you for this, it is exactly the sort of point I was hoping someone would test, and I may well be missing something. My reading of 16M(4)(b) is a little different.

    As I read it, (4)(b) only applies to a person who relies on Ground 1A in a claim form or particulars “having not done anything within paragraph (a) in relation to the ground”, which is the wording in 16M(2)(b). In plain terms, no notice or purported notice asserting that ground was served first. I assume that is aimed at cases like the court dispensing with notice, or the ground being added later with leave. Where a Ground 1A notice has been served, I think you are on the 16M(2)(a) route, and the period is the one in 16M(4)(a): service to twelve months after the date in the notice. On that reading, issuing in March would not start a second clock. I would be grateful to be shown otherwise, but that qualifying phrase seems to me to do the work.

    On 16M(7) I agree with you entirely, and thank you for raising it. A possession order on any other ground before the period ends brings it to an end on the day the order is made. As far as I can see it is the only thing in the section that shortens the period.

  • Member Since October 2020 - Comments: 1333

    11:14 AM, 27th August 2026, About 4 days ago

    Reply to the comment left by Tauhid Islam at 26/08/2026 – 15:17
    Yes, that looks right to me too.

    Just so that we’re clear, if a landlord serves a ground 1 or 1A notice, (regardless of whether its served in addition to a notice with a shorter period), it’s a 16 months lockout of re-letting from that point. If the tenants leaves lawfully of their own accord a short while later, that 16 month period remains in force.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles