2 years ago | 13 comments
Hi, I had a court hearing where we requested the judge to add the legal cost to the money order for 15 months of unpaid rent. As per the judge, this was not possible as my rental agreement does not have a clause for the tenant to pay the legal cost of eviction.
Considering the tenant has now appealed for the case to be reheard making many false stories and is clearly planning to not move out of the property and stay rent-free, I am sure I will be spending more cost with the solicitors.
Has anyone gone through this situation and is there any notice or document I can send to the tenant so any further legal cost of eviction becomes the tenant’s liability to pay?
Thanks,
Siva
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Rural renting soars - councils demand long-term housing plan
2 years ago | 13 comments
2 years ago | 7 comments
2 years ago | 15 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since December 2022 - Comments: 27
8:03 PM, 27th March 2024, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Smiffy at 26/03/2024 – 20:36
Judge is actually correct. If the landlord thinks he is wrong then file an appeal using form n161 appellants notice.
Member Since December 2022 - Comments: 27
8:05 PM, 27th March 2024, About 2 years ago
Reply to the comment left by David Houghton at 26/03/2024 – 17:52
Yes fixed costs. But if you want to recover your actual costs then a clause is required.
Member Since June 2022 - Comments: 110
7:54 AM, 30th March 2024, About 2 years ago
15 months of UNPAID RENT ???!! Where is the system stepping in to help so LL’s going bust ??!!! It is absolutely outrageous!!