Selective licensing – Effective tool but needs improving!

Selective licensing – Effective tool but needs improving!

10:09 AM, 24th September 2019, About 3 years ago 8

Text Size

Opinion Research Services was commissioned by MHCLG to carry out a review of selective licensing and carried out in-depth research and consultations with stakeholders from across the sector.

The report finds that selective licensing is an effective tool when implemented properly, and identifies a range of areas where the operation or implementation of selective licensing schemes could be improved.

Click here do download the full review

Recommendations of the report:

The evidence presented in this review supports the overall recommendation that selective licensing should be retained. The research undertaken indicates that the effectiveness of selective licensing could be improved through implementation of the following further recommendations:

1. In its current form, selective licensing legislation precludes authorities from taking direct enforcement measures against landlords where issues of property condition (in particular significant hazards under the Housing Health and Safety Rating System) are discovered during a selective licensing inspection, despite licensing schemes often being introduced specifically to tackle such issues. To address this, Government should consider amending the mandatory licence conditions with which a landlord must comply to include a standard requirement on property condition that covers the absence of serious hazards, for example: “the landlord should ensure that the property is in such a condition as to comply with the condition obligation of a landlord under section 9A of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 to let and keep a property fit for human habitation within the meaning of section 10 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985” Authorities should be permitted to enforce directly against this condition if prescribed hazards, which amount to the property not being fit for human habitation are discovered during a selective licensing inspection.

2. Government should consider issuing best practice/guidance as appropriate to support local authorities and improve the implementation of schemes.

3. Government should consider adding to the specific exemptions from selective licensing schemes where the case can be made; such as purpose-built student accommodation that follows a Government approved code 8 and non-profit charitable institutions that are not registered social housing providers.

4. Appropriate criteria that engage validation by the Secretary of State for all designations above a certain level should remain in place at a similar level to the current “20% of the privately rented sector (based on figures from census data) or 20% of total geographic area” threshold. However, Government should consider reviewing this threshold to ensure:

  1. That it relates to up-to-date data sources in the absence of a recent census(but not necessarily private rented sector specific data see 3);
  2. That smaller authorities are not disadvantaged by the criteria;
  3. That it is not based on the current size of the private rented sector in a local authority, given the difficulties inherent in enumerating this accurately.

5. Government should explore options for a “light touch” process for authorities seeking to re-designate an area at the end of a period of licensing. This should apply where there is no substantive change proposed to the existing scheme; and should maintain a requirement for consultation.

6. Government should consider introducing a national registration scheme for landlords to support and complement selective licensing.

7. Government should explore alternatives to judicial review as the primary method of challenging a designation, as the process of judicial review can be prohibitively expensive.

8. Government should consider reviewing requirements for advertising upon designation to ensure they are appropriate; this should reflect the reduction in the circulation of existing newspapers and the widespread use of social media and other electronic formats for the dissemination of information.

9. Currently, in most cases, licenses are issued for a full five-year period regardless of the time remaining on the designation. Local authorities introducing new schemes should adopt the practice of charging the enforcement element of the licence fee on a prorated basis to allow this element of the charge to reflect the remainder of the designation period. This should only apply in cases where there is no evidence of a deliberate attempt to avoid applying for a licence.

10. Currently there is an extensive mandatory list of questions that must be asked on any licensing application.12 Government should consider allowing local authorities to streamline the licence application process for landlords by allowing local authorities to include on the application form only those questions that they consider relevant to their specific scheme. (see paragraphs 10.20 to 10.25).

11. Government should consider expanding the range of offences which can trigger a landlord failing the “fit and proper person” test as part of an application for a licence to include breaches of planning law.

12. Currently, local authorities with a selective licensing designation can investigate housing benefit and council tax data for the purpose of gathering intelligence about the private rented sector. Government should explore options for usefully expanding the range of data that can be shared with local authorities beyond this. This might include revising the appropriate guidance and legislation to take account of the introduction of universal credit.

Conclusions of the report:

The research overall indicates that selective licensing can be an effective and positive policy tool. There are a wide range of concrete examples of schemes achieving demonstrable positive outcomes. Furthermore, these schemes operate in a range of different ways dependent on local conditions and requirements, demonstrating that selective licensing offers the facility to provide a flexible framework to reflect local circumstances.

However, it is also clear that there is considerable variation in the effectiveness of individual selective licensing schemes: some do not achieve tangible, positive results to the same degree as others. The extent to which a scheme is integrated into wider local strategies appears to play a key role in its effectiveness.


by Chris @ Possession Friend

10:26 AM, 25th September 2019, About 3 years ago

The report isn't worth the paper its written on !
All but one of 44 L.A's " believe " THEIR schemes are effective !
Talk about bias.
How can they claim this when so many schemes don't actually do anything other than collect money from Landlords and create a useless bureaucracy. ?

by Michael Barnes

12:00 PM, 25th September 2019, About 3 years ago

Without input from tenants and landlords it is almost worthless.

by Mick Roberts

7:32 AM, 28th September 2019, About 3 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Michael Barnes at 25/09/2019 - 12:00Exactly Michael and Chris.
I've not read all the above, as I'm away on small phone.
But asking the council's is pointless.
It's exactly what DWP do when finding out if Universal Credit is working. They go ask the Job Centres. What point is that? They tell u what u want to hear. Meanwhile the tenants who are going hungry and homeless aren't asked a bean.
This survey, why not come ask my tenants if they've had a rent increase for it?
Or if their houses have got worse from it? Cause mine have cause there is now less funds.
And the bad Landlords don't come forward to pay the fee.

by Marie

11:10 AM, 28th September 2019, About 3 years ago

Its actually discriminating against sharers. For example in London they have now brought out SL in a borough, so 3 individual people cannot share a 3 bed or 2 bed property without a licence. So landlords that do not want the expense and effort of having to get a licence will restrict renting to 2 people. So people who can only afford to rent if they share with two other people are now priced out of the market. It is however ok for a couple with multiple children, ie they want you to take the DSS applicants but young people just starting out with their first job etc are priced out of the market. That is discrimination in my book, all done under the excuse of protecting the tenants of course.

by Mick Roberts

12:48 PM, 28th September 2019, About 3 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Marie at 28/09/2019 - 11:10
That's it,
The excuse of protecting the tenant.
Instead of actually asking ALL tenants what they would like.
They only concentrate on them that's come in to say they have a problem.

Forgetting their is 79% happy tenants they never get to know about, as they NEVER come forward as they have no reason to.

by Old Mrs Landlord

21:54 PM, 28th September 2019, About 3 years ago

From what I have heard and read in these pages and elsewhere, it's a very effective tool and has been successful in raising: revenue for councils; rents for tenants; the number of landlords leaving the sector or converting to holiday lets/airbnb/serviced accommodation; landlords' blood pressure and stress levels; the number of trees turned to wood pulp for the mountains of paper generated; the number of homeless families in temporary accommodation and the number of landlords prosecuted, mainly for not having a licence. What's not to like? Clearly a runaway success so a very effective tool.

by Chris @ Possession Friend

22:07 PM, 28th September 2019, About 3 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Old Mrs Landlord at 28/09/2019 - 21:54
Yes, a tool for Increasing rents for All Tenants, whilst the Bad Landlords just don't bother getting licensed !

by Mick Roberts

6:31 AM, 29th September 2019, About 3 years ago

Reply to the comment left by Old Mrs Landlord at 28/09/2019 - 21:54
The paper generated was shocking.
I think I worked it out at 596,000 pieces of paper.
Even my missus was getting DUPLICATE 14 pages each of what Licensing were also sending me and said we sending u this cause u may have an interest in the property.
Writing to my lender to say I must have a license.
I use a PO box for my business and tenants, but lenders like to have our home address. Lenders were writing to me saying Nottingham Council have told us u have moved house, u have to fill this and that in and send ID in etc before u can access your account. I hadn't moved house, but the bureaucracy Licensing put on good Landlords and tenants that din't have a problem is horrendous.

My tenants have wrote in to licensing say they don't want em coming in their homes, been there 14 years 22 years etc., no problems, leave us alone. Licensing still not replied to them 3 to 4 months later.

Leave Comments

Please Log-In OR Become a member to reply to comments or subscribe to new comment notifications.

Forgotten your password?


Landlord Tax Planning Book Now