3 weeks ago | 7 comments
Landlords look set to bring in tougher tenant checks as new Renters’ Rights Act rules ban advance rent payments of more than one month.
Research from LRG found that fewer than a third of landlords are fully aware of the restriction, while 43% know the rules have changed but remain unsure of the details.
A further 26% said the cap on advance rent payments was news to them.
The findings come from LRG’s latest Lettings Report, based on responses from 650 landlords and tenants across England and Wales.
The chief lettings officer at Leaders, which is part of LRG, Allison Thompson, said: “The Renters’ Rights Act has some genuinely important protections for tenants, and we support the direction of travel.
“But the data should give policymakers pause.
“When more than half of landlords expect to see higher-risk applications as a direct result of removing advance rent, and 17% are considering leaving the sector altogether, we have to ask whether the rules are working as intended.”
She added: “The tenants who most need stability are the same ones who will struggle most if supply contracts further.”
LRG says its survey suggests many landlords are still working through the practical consequences.
That includes appreciating that the Act may make access to homes harder for the renters they were designed to help.
With advance rent restricted, 58% of landlords expect to receive more borderline or higher-risk applications, including 18% who expect significantly more.
Only 10% expect the quality of applicants to improve.
The report also points to changing landlord behaviour as 38% say they are either reconsidering whether to continue letting or be more selective about who they accept.
A further 6% said they are slightly more selective.
The most common response, cited by 42% of landlords, was to rely more heavily on their letting agent to screen applicants.
LRG says professional screening is likely to become more important as landlords adjust to the new rules and reassess risk.
LRG also raises concerns over housing options for tenants who struggle to compete in the open market.
It says 70% of landlords would not consider letting to a local council or housing association, while fewer than 1% currently do so.
Among tenants surveyed, 69% described themselves as heavily or completely dependent on the private rented sector, with no other viable option.
The report says any further reduction in available homes, or any tightening of landlord selection criteria, would be felt by tenants with the fewest alternatives.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
London lettings demand and supply rise
3 weeks ago | 7 comments
3 weeks ago | 1 comments
Report form is not available.
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 42
10:15 AM, 21st May 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Advanced rent payments are not banned. Just very very risky as tenant must offer, LL can not ask for it. LL would have to sign contract BEFORE advance is paid. This leaves the door wide open for the tenant to NOT pay the agreed sum . Worse still, the LL HAS to hand over the keys as the contract is now live. Waiting to see cleared funds is now illegal. You couldn’t make this stuff up.
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2228 - Articles: 2
10:39 AM, 21st May 2026, About 3 weeks ago
The title of this thread is incorrect, it should read “Renters’ Rights Act WILL leave tenants with fewer options”
Member Since August 2025 - Comments: 54
6:13 PM, 21st May 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Yes we agree abuser tenants will struggle to find a place to live. Fake news about increase in house sales will not help. Who wants to spend hard earned money just to let abusers use for thier luxury to come and trash the place then get told by the same tenant to go get lost?.
Joe
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 476 - Articles: 1
7:57 PM, 21st May 2026, About 3 weeks ago
Reply to the comment left by The_Maluka at 21/05/2026 – 10:39
Yup, Dead right, as I explain here: https://www.lettingfocus.com/blogs/2026/05/renters-rights-act-becomes-law-and-some-consequences/
Member Since October 2022 - Comments: 218
9:02 AM, 22nd May 2026, About 3 weeks ago
I think the time for moaning is well and truly over. There’s only so long we can be like the legendary Cnut and try to preach to the tide. It’s clear to anyone with a milligramme of intelligence and interest that the whole thing is a huge stitch up motivated by a combination of vested interests, long-running misinformation campaigns (the biggest lie being that Section 21 is a no-fault eviction) and ideologically motivated good intentions (and we all know where those lead).
The only realistic way forward is to focus on how landlords can benefit from the extra power inadvertently handed to them by the legislation and let the politicians and do-gooders gradually realise the consequences of what they have done. The biggest advantage is the supply shortage as nobody in their right mind would enter the market as it now stands.
For those of us still holding on, we have the power to de-risk by setting ever higher tenant standards, drawing from a much larger pool of higher quality tenants, taking only the very best who are decent-minded people. We can also make it clear to any tenant who doesn’t fall into line that they will be dragged through the courts and never again be housed, which should give them pause for thought. And let government and tenant rights groups deal with everybody else.