1 year ago | 14 comments
A build-to-rent (BTR) developer is offering free mental health checks, as Generation Rent studies claim private renting negatively impacts tenants’ mental health.
BTR developer Moda claims offering mental health services would mean “that tenants would not be as stressed as private renters who have to deal with absent landlords.”
Despite claiming private renters are not happy, private renters say they are happier with their homes (82%) compared to those in the social housing sector (74%).
BTR developer Moda say their new block of flats near the US embassy in London, would include access to mental health sessions in their rent packages.
This would include how to manage stress and how to improve “stress resilience” with sleep guides. Alongside mental health services, the accommodation would offer a karaoke room and a golf simulator.
According to Generation Rent, nine in ten private renters feel their mental health has been negatively affected by their housing situation. Nearly two in five said it has impacted their physical health.
Ben Twomey, chief executive of Generation Rent, claims private renters live in constant fear due to eviction.
He said: “Because landlords don’t need a reason to evict us, renters live in constant insecurity, which does incredible damage to our psychological wellbeing.”
Moda claim BTR is an important choice for renters, offering wellbeing services that private renting cannot provide.
Lydia Eustace, head of wellbeing at Moda, told The Telegraph: “Offering these mental health services means that tenants will not be as stressed as private renters who have to deal with absent landlords.
“It’s why build-to-rent (BTR) is so important as an option for renters. We’re running this for the long-term. You can’t possibly get these services with private renting.”
However, despite Moda claiming their services offer mental health support, many renters would simply not be able to afford the rent prices for Moda’s new development, which cost £2,600 per month, with a three-bedroom flat costing £4,600 per month.
This means private renters would need to earn more than £31,000 for a standard apartment and £55,000 for a three-bed, not including bills, food, or other living costs.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Rental yields strengthen in England and Wales
1 year ago | 14 comments
2 years ago | 7 comments
2 years ago | 15 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3515 - Articles: 5
12:20 PM, 7th April 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by TheMaluka at 05/04/2025 – 12:14
years ago true, but many might be getting that income but with it still comes a lack of job security. 25 year term is bad enough but now there is the option of a 40 year one. (Ouch)
Plus even on that income you are still expected to bung down a decent deposit and be canny enough to secure the best mortgage deal – which as we all know will not be going down anytime soon.
Despite everything else going up, renting is still a viable option if you are already able to pay market rent levels.
A lot of issues are tenants are finding renting ‘un affordable/challenging’ because the rent has been below market rate up to now and it is only because the LL is putting it up to the levels dictated by the market, that its an issue for some.
Buying will never be the ultimate goal, long term plan (or even achievable) for many tenants, even if they wanted to.
To deny them the opportunity to make that choice for themselves is why the RRB is going to shaft more than it proports to ‘help’.