Nottingham City Council faces funding questions ahead of Awaab’s law deadline

Nottingham City Council faces funding questions ahead of Awaab’s law deadline

9:48 AM, 20th June 2025, About 3 weeks ago 5

Text Size

Nottingham City Council claims it has spent more than £2.4 million on damp and mould repairs to its social homes, but there are still questions about how the council can afford other repairs ahead of new legislation.

A news report by the Nottingham Post reveals that councillors are questioning whether the council has enough funds to address all the issues in its social housing before the introduction of Awaab’s Law.

In October 2025, all social housing landlords and providers, including councils, will be legally required to fix dangerous damp and mould within set timeframes and complete emergency repairs within 24 hours.

Damp and mould within council properties caused by different factors

In the minutes of the council meeting for the Place, Economy and Infrastructure Scrutiny Committee, the council claims damp and mould within their social housing properties are caused by a variety of factors.

The council says: “During the winter period, Housing Services can receive approximately 300 requests per month for damp and mould inspections, where increasing demand could have been contributed to by tenants experiencing fuel poverty and cost of living pressures.

“Damp and mould within council properties results from a combination of environmental, structural and usage factors that are often interconnected.”

The council claims a “team is working to implement and improve several measures to mitigate and prevent damp and mould within their homes”.

The council adds since December last year, the number of properties with damp has decreased from 1,736 to 957. However, a prominent Nottingham landlord says this still means a large percentage of the council’s housing stock still has damp and mould.

Mick Roberts, one of Nottingham’s largest landlords to house benefit tenants, tells Property118: “This is shocking. If you look at the figures, they had over 6% of their homes affected by damp and mould. I’d be crucified by licensing if that were my statistics.”

According to the council, the total cost of dealing with damp and mould in 2024/2025 was £2.4 million.

Aligning ourselves into a position for when Awaab’s law comes in

However, in the committee meeting, Councillor Kirsty Jones, questioned whether the council, having already spent £2.4 million on damp and mould repairs, will have sufficient funds to fix the remaining issues in its social housing by the October deadline.

Steve Edlin, assistant director of asset management at the council, told the Nottingham Post: “We are aligning ourselves into a position for when Awaab’s law comes in, because yes, when we know what came out from the government about it, they had underestimated the costs of implementing it.

“We are also looking at any Artificial Intelligence (AI) solutions that could help us manage that, and have that resource to tackle any issues.”

When asked by Property118 if the council’s plan to tackle damp and mould was fully funded, a Nottingham City Council spokesperson said: “We want all our tenants to live in safe, warm, comfortable homes. We’re making significant investments in tackling damp and mould, and all our plans are fully funded.”

As previously reported by Property118, despite urging private landlords to improve their properties and implement selective licensing, the council’s own social housing has been labelled a ‘house of horrors.

Mr Roberts tells Property118 he is now selling all his properties due to the hassle of selective licensing.

He says: “I’m selling all mine and getting hassled by licensing now to license them even though I’m doing my best to find landlords to keep the tenants in at the same rents.

“It seems Nottingham Council’s selective licensing would rather have me evict and sell than keep the tenants safe, as that’s the only way I can comply with their exemption rules that last for three months before the house must be sold.”


Share This Article


Comments

Mick Roberts

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

10:31 AM, 20th June 2025, About 3 weeks ago

They a disgrace. No one ever takes accountability. The Council employee moves on & u in the same mess a year later.

I've just paid a Council tax bill I didn't owe cause went to court twice over 15 months.

I've finally got someone high up in Council Tax as all my previous top managers has left, & she said Really sorry Mick, we didn't know the legislation of the Leeds 2016 case Contractual Periodic tenancy. I said I've been putting it in every letter. Just think Hang on, what if he is right.

Makes it 10 times worse u can no longer email them to say I wish to pay. They have a contact us page on the website which the Council love as it's good for their staff. But horrendous for us that have to keep writing to the Council when they get 100% of cases wrong.

DPT

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

11:49 AM, 20th June 2025, About 3 weeks ago

Ive noticed something of a corelation between that poor state of Councils housing stock and the vigour with which they attack the local PRS.

Cider Drinker

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

12:56 PM, 20th June 2025, About 3 weeks ago

I’m mortgage free and my properties are EPC Rate C - just.

I could pay £10k per property for upgrades from my other investments but I won’t do so without completing a cost - benefit analysis. Something that politicians don’t seem able to do.

1. Would I be better off? No, I’d have £10k per property less. At my desired rate of return, I’d want my £10k to be repaid, with interest, over ten years. That’s around £75 to £100 per month in additional rent.

The houses will not increase in value by anywhere near the cost of the improvements. My houses are valued at around £100k each. £10k is 18 to 24 months’ gross rent. Or around 4 to 8 years of net profit

2. Would the tenant be better off? No, they’d save £150 to £250 per YEAR in heating their homes. The increased rent comfortably wipes that out.

Desert Rat

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

2:36 AM, 22nd June 2025, About 2 weeks ago

I've had a couple of reports of damp and mould. Fitted a PIV fan and it went away.

When tenant moved to a another 1 of my other houses that had no damp or mould issues, guess what. It had damp and mould issues on that house as well.

I don't think its the house causing the problems.

I now only take on older people that have previously owned their own home and know how to take care of it.

Stella

Become a Member

If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!

Sign Up

12:56 PM, 22nd June 2025, About 2 weeks ago

Reply to the comment left by Desert Rat at 22/06/2025 - 02:36Having rented one property to various tenants for about 25 years and never a problem with damp or mould until 3 guys moved in and within 2 months the lounge and kitchen were black with mould.
The problem went when they went.
Most of these problems are lifestyle problems.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Automated Assistant Read More