1 year ago | 40 comments
It’s been six months since the Renters’ Rights Bill hit the statute books and the dust still hasn’t settled.
Tenants are outraged at the government’s meddling and can’t believe that evictions haven’t ended.
That’s despite reassurances from the naïve crowd in Labour that Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions are the ‘leading cause of homelessness’.
But we’ve since found out that wasn’t the case.
Rent arrears, anti-social behaviour and fed-up landlords bailing out of the PRS are the reasons why renters were being evicted.
Who knew?
There’s little festive cheer for the UK’s landlords after the promise of tenant empowerment has morphed into a harsh autumn of a growing PRS disaster, and frankly, it’s not a pretty sight.
My crystal ball has been working overtime to paint this bleak picture:
Housing minister Matthew Pennycook and his cronies still deny there’s evidence of a landlord exodus, but more are leaving than investing. They bury their heads in the sand and deny the damage, but the reality is clear.
The Renters’ Rights Bill, far from being a panacea, has exacerbated the very problems it purported to solve. Even the government’s late pitch to impose rent caps doesn’t play well – everyone can now see why rents are rising. It isn’t landlord greed.
For landlords, Christmas 2025 is a stark reminder of well-intentioned, but ultimately misguided, legislation.
It’s a time for reflection, and perhaps, a strategic rethink.
The PRS landscape has undoubtedly changed with both tenants and landlords losing out.
The scenario was inevitable but it’s way worse than landlords could have foreseen and there’s no sign of a U-turn since the Labour clown show government is too busy fighting the fires it started: there’s no economic growth, immigration spirals out of control, overtaxed businesses are still laying off, incomes and living standards plummet – basically, it’s January 2025 on steroids.
We’re back to the problem of unintended consequences – that is if you ignore the expertise of landlords who have been vilified and who are too beaten to say, ‘We told you this would happen’.
Until next time,
The Landlord Crusader
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
1 year ago | 40 comments
1 year ago | 12 comments
1 year ago | 20 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since August 2016 - Comments: 1190
9:23 AM, 31st January 2025, About 1 year ago
And there’s not even any short term accommodation as all the hotels are full of male doctors, nurses and software engineers.
Member Since April 2017 - Comments: 163 - Articles: 1
9:24 AM, 31st January 2025, About 1 year ago
No fault, evictions are misnamed. There is almost always somebody at fault. Except in the rare occasions when somebody wants a property back to sell or to live themselves there is always somebody at fault. My evictions have only been through nonpayment of rent or being forced to sell because of endless legislation which is anti-landlord and tenant. For instance the removal of being able to charge your costs (interest) or because local authorities are putting arbitrary minimum room sizes in on top of the silly country minimum room size in HMOs. So that is the fault of the local authority or the government directly and specifically.
The legislation seems to think there is endless supply that is not good. The actual problem is that there is simply not enough supply but everything seems to be being done to reduce the supply further. No fault evictions are entirely misnamed.
Member Since January 2022 - Comments: 4
10:03 AM, 31st January 2025, About 1 year ago
There is no “mass exodus” of landlords, of course that depends on how you define exodus, but there are not thousands selling every day but there most certainly has been a steady exiting by landlords for many reasons but legislation being the biggest driver. Simple maths proves this and thus the losers are our tenants because there is less supply therefore they will accept anything to call a home which allows the unscrupulous landlords to cash in on those tenants forced out of the mainstream market by ill thought out legalisation.
Member Since October 2022 - Comments: 402
10:14 AM, 31st January 2025, About 1 year ago
Exactly, very few available rentals out there.I get a lot of texts from ex tenants. Have you got anything. So when someone does go at least I won’t have to advertise, and I can increase the rent for the new people. Usually a quiet tenant doesn’t get a rent increase, but they stay much longer now, and inflation annual rises will be written in to the tenancy. So it’s just retire 5 or 10 years earlier for us. Really bad for tenants
Member Since May 2024 - Comments: 46
10:26 AM, 31st January 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Ross Tulloch at 31/01/2025 – 09:24
If they want a catch phrase closer to the point (which they won’t as it doesn’t fit the narrative), they should use S21 no reason given Notice. Once these are converted to S8 then they will have their reasons and it won’t be to put up the rent (as they claim). The majority will be to sell.
Member Since September 2023 - Comments: 10
10:38 AM, 31st January 2025, About 1 year ago
Exodus is melodramatic. I imagine many landlords will be similar to myself selling properties as and when they become vacant (as long as they can afford to do this). I have sold 2 HMOs and selling a third (as rooms were vacated) and I have several flats with long term tenants. So I would not evict everyone and sell but simply await the opportunity. So I predict a steady but solid decline and it may even take years.
I know nostalgia is not what it used to be but does anyone remember 15-20 years ago when the rental market war brimming. There was so many landlords and therefore lots of choice for tenants because landlords were competing. This occurred because it was largely unregulated but it wasn’t the wild west. I don’t have to tell readers here of the swathes of red tape (and threats of fines) for non compliance that we now have. I genuinely enjoyed being a landlord back then …
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1575
10:38 AM, 31st January 2025, About 1 year ago
The RRB hasn’t “hit the statute books’.
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1575
11:01 AM, 31st January 2025, About 1 year ago
Successive governments have wanted to fix the PRS.
It was seen as too emotional. Some landlords would seek an eviction for the flimsiest of grounds. This caused tenants to look for Social Housing and many ended up in temporary accommodation at huge expense to the taxpayer. Some landlords see LHA Rates as the minimum that they should charge.
As landlords age, many choose to sell up with vacant possession. This will continue post RRB if the Section 8 Ground remains mandatory. I think this is where a hardship test might come in. The Courts will act as a funnel with lots of possession cases being poured in the top but only a manageable number coming out of the bottom.
The government want more larger landlords within Ltd companies that can help to solve the problem of landlords ageing and choosing to sell.
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1630 - Articles: 3
11:04 AM, 31st January 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by John Nyari at 31/01/2025 – 10:38I really did enjoy being a landlord up until the impact of S24 became apparent. I then started to take my profits. But it wasn’t until a tenant cost me £20k+ in 2021 that I finally said ‘I’m done!’. One more BTL to go. I’m just waiting for the tenant to give notice, and thought it was about to happen when I increased the rent. She decide to stay!
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1575
11:23 AM, 31st January 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by NewYorkie at 31/01/2025 – 11:04
I enjoyed being a landlord until I had to put rents up to levels I think are ridiculous.