Mayors could gain new powers to impose overnight levy on holiday lets in England
The government have announced a consultation on new powers for regional Mayors to impose an overnight levy on holiday lets.
The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government have confirmed any new levy would apply to visitors at accommodation providers, including hotels, holiday lets, bed and breakfasts, and guesthouses.
However, Propertymark warns an overnight levy could place pressure on holiday-let owners.
Put more money into local authorities
Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government Steve Reed said: “Tourists travel from near and far to visit England’s brilliant cities and regions.
“We’re giving our mayors powers to harness this and put more money into local priorities, so they can keep driving growth and investing in these communities for years to come.”
London Mayor Sadiq Khan welcomed the news on the consultation and claimed the overnight levy will help invest in the London economy.
He said: “Giving Mayors the powers to raise a tourist levy is great news for London.
“The extra funding will directly support London’s economy, and help cement our reputation as a global tourism and business destination. It also shows what can be done when ministers work closely with Mayors to devolve more powers to cities and regions.
“As part of developing our plans for the levy we will work closely with the hospitality and tourism sectors to ensure it delivers the maximum benefits for London and our brilliant businesses.”
Overnight levy could increase costs for holiday-lets
However, an industry body has warned that an overnight levy could increase costs for short-term lets and is urging holiday-let owners to participate in the consultation.
Nathan Emerson, chief executive of Propertymark, told Property118: “A thriving short-term lettings sector is vital for local economies, but any new mayoral powers must be proportionate and evidence-led. An overnight levy may raise important revenue for high-visitor areas, yet it risks placing further pressure on responsible property owners already operating on tight margins.
“Agents in holiday and tourist hotspots should monitor this closely, as added costs will influence behaviour and affect footfall, desirability, and flexibility across the housing market, from rentals and sales to second homes and short-term lets. With the consultation open until February and scope for local exemptions, it is important that those with concerns contribute.”
Scotland offers a clear warning
Propertymark points out that an overnight levy will come into force in Edinburgh from July next year, and England must be careful not to repeat Scotland’s mistakes.
Mr Emerson adds: “Scotland offers a clear warning. Under the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Act, councils can now tax paid overnight accommodation, and Edinburgh will apply a 5% charge from July 2026. Without strong links to wider tourism and housing strategies, such levies have already contributed to higher costs, reduced supply, and fewer options for tenants and visitors.
“Propertymark supports improved regulation, such as the upcoming short-term lets register, to level the playing field with long-term rentals and protect consumers. However, taxes continue to increase for private landlords, second-home owners, and additional property purchasers, and policymakers cannot tax their way out of structural housing issues.
“Unless Mayors align levy schemes with local tourism plans and the UK government better integrates housing and economic policy, England risks repeating the challenges emerging in Scotland. Propertymark will engage fully with the consultation to help ensure any new system supports communities without discouraging investment or reducing choice.”
The consultation can be found by clicking here.
Comments
Have Your Say
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 281
10:32 AM, 2nd December 2025, About 5 months ago
If a tourist location is thriving why on earth would you need to forcibly remove money from the paying visitors that would otherwise be spent during the stay? Typical socialist state control and another layer of tax collection bureaucracy on businesses already paying tax through four separate channels – business rates, remitting VAT, doing payroll for employer NI, and paying corporation tax on profit (or income tax if unincorporated) . And five years down the line it will be universal once it gets a hold in the tourist hotspots, a fiver on a Premier Inn on an industrial estate on the outskirts of Bolton – so has anyone really gained? It’s impossible to just charge tourists so everyone staying for work or family reasons will pay.
And also not a comparable situation to Europe where these local taxes are common – they have a different set up with VAT being charged at a lower rate, typically between 6 and 13%, on hotel stays (compared to our standard 20% rate). Eating out is usually at a lower VAT rate too. My experience is paying less in Europe after these local taxes than at home in equivalent accommodation without them.
Member Since September 2024 - Comments: 95
8:23 AM, 3rd December 2025, About 5 months ago
Taxation without representation ought to be illegal. It will always be easier to persuade voters that “someone else” will pay.
If not on the costs that tourism incurs, what exactly are business rates on accommodation and VAT on tourism activities spent on?
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 1447 - Articles: 1
10:16 AM, 6th December 2025, About 5 months ago
This will have disastrous consequences for touring actors, musicians, dancers, singers, stage crew, film crews and the entertainment and Theatre in Education industry.
Theatre /crew digs are offered by many to those in the entertainment industry at prices they can afford. If no longer affordable then many will not be able to take on these jobs.
Member Since March 2023 - Comments: 1506
7:50 AM, 7th December 2025, About 5 months ago
I agree with the principle but not the method. Fox example if you visit New Zealand you pay 100$ as part of the visa to cover tourism and conservation.
The way we intent to implement it it is just a money grabbing tax that will fund nothing but the ‘big pot’
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 281
8:13 AM, 7th December 2025, About 5 months ago
Reply to the comment left by GlanACC at 07/12/2025 – 07:50
I was astounded to read what the business rates bill for just Heathrow airport will rise to shortly – £300 million pounds annually which is ultimately charged to visitors in their flight costs and is raising significant sums from overseas visitors – but in a less obvious manner than a specific charge or visa cost.
I don’t know what comparable business taxes are in overseas countries, but I get the general idea that the UK there is already a fairly heavy tax take from visitors – we charge full rate VAT on hotel stays and eating out whilst Europe has reduced VAT on them generally. Employer NI at 15% above a wage level of just £5,000 must bring in a huge sum from hospitality when you think of the numbers employed in tourism serving overseas visitors.Then we cut down the VAT free shopping for overseas visitors where the VAT they now pay is going into our public services that they obviously don’t benefit from when they leave the country with their goods.
I just get the general idea our politicians never know when to stop – ending up with a ‘Rip Off Britain’ scenario which, as clearly seen with Rachel Reeves’ performance to date, actually achieves the opposite to what is intended to happen.