1 year ago | 6 comments
Anxiety over the Renters’ Rights Bill is mounting among property agents as it reaches its Report Stage in the House of Commons this week, Propertymark says.
The professional body found that 50% of agents are concerned about the bill’s potential impact, including increased administrative burdens and broader consequences for the private rented sector.
Beyond the Bill, 12% of agents expressed concerns about upcoming Stamp Duty changes, while 12% are worried about the government’s Energy Performance certificate reforms.
Landlord exits from the market also emerged as a significant concern for 7% of respondents.
Propertymark’s chief executive, Nathan Emerson, said: “It is vital that as this legislation passes through Parliament that the UK government listens to the many concerns that agents still have about this legislation.
“There are other issues in the private rental sector that the government must concentrate on, such as a shortage of supply and the taxes and regulations that are weighing heavily on landlords.”
He adds: “The government must ensure that it gets its priorities right so that both tenants and landlords can benefit from a stable and affordable private rental market.”
The Renters’ Rights Bill aims to address issues like Section 21 ‘no-fault’ evictions, allowing tenants to keep pets and abolishing fixed-term tenancies.
It also introduces a Decent Homes Standard, a new ombudsman service and a digital private rented sector database.
Timothy Douglas, the head of policy and campaigns at Propertymark, says he has pointed to the potential unintended consequences of the Bill in a submission to the Public Bill Committee.
He highlighted concerns about shrinking supply in the PRS, a huge demand-supply imbalance and the erosion of investor confidence.
Mr Douglas also cautioned against excessive regulation and a ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach to energy efficiency, advocating for the retention of fixed-term tenancies.
Propertymark believes the government must address the costs and taxes impacting private landlords to ensure their continued participation in the rental market.
The body also supports the registration of short-term rentals, as outlined in the Levelling Up and Regeneration Act 2023.
On fixed-term tenancies, Propertymark argues that they provide both landlords and tenants with necessary certainty, particularly within the student lettings market.
The removal of Section 21, Propertymark warns, requires a robust and thoroughly tested alternative to avoid overwhelming the courts system.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Landlords warned of fake payslip scam
1 year ago | 6 comments
1 year ago | 12 comments
1 year ago | 12 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 31
9:57 AM, 13th January 2025, About 1 year ago
Propertymark is doing a much better job of representing the interests of landlords than the NRLA is doing.
Member Since January 2017 - Comments: 110
10:17 AM, 13th January 2025, About 1 year ago
Absolutely. The NRLA are so bad under the current leadership, you have to wonder if there is some other ulterior motive at play.
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 754
11:22 AM, 13th January 2025, About 1 year ago
Perhaps it’s how the article was written, but from the presentation here, I’m not sure PropertyMark have got their own priorities right: they should be more vigorously supporting landlords interests than their own – the impact on landlords is huge, and without landlords, Propertymark’s clientele will diminish significantly, hence they will have all the time in the world to deal with the additional “administrative burden”.
Member Since February 2023 - Comments: 22
9:34 PM, 14th January 2025, About 1 year ago
5% SDLT surcharge is another elephant in the room. For 20000 property SDLT is approx 11500 + conveyance. And properly price in this region is stagnant for more than 10 years. So you will never get capital gain on this. For 150k mortgage you have to pay approx 750 every month. For 200k property you will get rent of 1000. So what you get is 100 pounds per month all expenditure. Who would invest in property market. Btl is dead. People who unable to sell are only letting property now. This is beyond unacceptable