Lease Extension and Marriage Value?

Lease Extension and Marriage Value?

9:01 AM, 8th September 2020, About 4 years ago 15

Text Size

Hi All, I was hoping for a bit of advice from the community RE. Lease Extensions, I’m a landlord with three properties in my portfolio.

Can I confirm that Marriage Value is added to the price of a lease extension when the lease falls *below* 80 years?

The reason I ask is I approached my freeholder at the beginning of March earlier in the year around extending my lease and numerous times since.

• The current lease is for 99 years from 1st January 2003
• The current lease will expire 1st January 2102
• Leaving 81 years 3 months currently unexpired

Initially, my freeholder was a little slow to reply, but with a little polite follow up I got some replies:

• End of April “You know the circumstances, we will get back as the things improve”
• Beginning of August “Please bear with me on lease extension, as we come out from COVID-19 ,will sort it out.”
• Latest “Thank you for your email, presently I am unable to give you time frame as our surveyor passed away due to COVID-19 and other are on furlough.”

Now I have no reason to believe there is any malice here, our relations have been pretty good.
Just a nagging thought, as I was hoping to have the lease extension sorted by now and 6 months have now passed since my first approach to extend.

In order to avoid the marriage value costs, I’d have to get the extension sorted before 31st Dec 2021?
i.e. I still have 15 months to sort it.

Any advice greatly received.

Chris

Editors Note: From the Leasehold Advisory Service >> https://www.lease-advice.org/lease-glossary/marriage-value/

Marriage value is the increase in the value of the property following the completion of the lease extension, reflecting the additional market value of the longer lease. In that this potential ‘profit’ only arises from the landlord’s obligation to grant the new lease, the legislation requires that it be shared equally between the parties.

The calculation of the marriage value, according to Schedule 13, is the difference between two aggregate amounts, which are:

  1. the value of the leaseholder’s interest under the present lease
    plus the value of the landlord’s interest prior to the grant of the new lease
    plus the value of any intermediate interests
  2. the value of the leaseholder’s interest with the new lease
    plus the value of the landlord’s interest once the new lease is granted
    plus the value of any intermediate interests (if remaining)

The legislation stipulates that where the unexpired term of the lease exceeds 80 years the marriage value shall be taken to be nil. In other words ,no marriage value is payable where the lease exceeds 80 years when the application to extend is served.

Taking the figures from the example, the calculation will be:

leaseholder’s present interest = £150,000
plus landlord’s present interest = £6,600
= £156,600

 

leaseholder’s new interest = £165,000
plus landlord’s new interest = £74
= £165,074

The marriage value is therefore £165,074 minus £156,600 = £8,474

Taking the 50:50 split between the landlord and the leaseholder, the leaseholder would have to pay half this figure – £4,237 – in addition to the reduction in the landlord’s interest.

In this example it can be seen that marriage value can considerably exceed the value of the landlord’s interest. Its calculation is dependent upon the estimated increase in value of the flat and, clearly, the lower that increase the lower will be the marriage value. This is an area where the input of a valuer with local knowledge is of paramount importance to both parties in order to provide substantive comparable evidence of the local market and how, if at all, flat values will be affected.

The longer the current lease the lower the latent marriage value may be, until eventually it becomes negligible.


Share This Article


Comments

BernieW

12:57 PM, 9th September 2020, About 4 years ago

Dennis Forrest

16:31 PM, 9th September 2020, About 4 years ago

Freeholders will do their best to avoid giving you a statutory lease extension as with a peppercorn rent they cease to make any money from the lease. Longer term any possible future 90 year lease extensions will cost peanuts and the freeholder will have died years ago. However if the ground rent is onerous, e.g. doubling every 10 years then the possibility that you might purse the statutory route puts you in a better bargaining position and the freeholder is more likely liable to offer you a good compromise deal. Do not accept the first offer and keep bargaining. Keep up the pressure by apply to the First Tier Tribunal. The freeholder will not know whether you are bluffing or not. In my case the freeholder eventually compromised from originally asking for a £14,000 lease premium to eventually accepting a £5,500 lease premium.

chris@greenlight.co.uk

16:47 PM, 9th September 2020, About 4 years ago

Reply to the comment left by at 09/09/2020 - 16:31
Oh wow! that's really good to know.
Thank you so much for taking the time to reply.

doug

9:27 AM, 12th September 2020, About 4 years ago

The game changes where there is an intermediate interest, that is to say a head lease, which may only be a few days longer than your lease. Here the total compensation can almost double we have found. An obvious flaw in the operation of the system!

terry sullivan

14:03 PM, 12th September 2020, About 4 years ago

Reply to the comment left by doug at 12/09/2020 - 09:27
a deliberate flaw?

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now