3 weeks ago | 1 comments
Never in the history of rental property has so much damage been done by so few to so many.
It is now evident it’s not just bad landlords that are being impacted, but all landlords and all tenants, literally millions of people. By treating landlords as serious criminals for not sending a four-page letter to their tenants (which can easily be found on the internet)
Then, imposing a fine of £7000 for each failure, the government is categorising a section of the population with unprecedented punitive threats. It’s quite remarkable but incredibly damaging to the whole rental industry.
The failure to send the letter immediately puts you, one of the good landlords who has got on just fine with your tenants for years, in the category 5 criminal bracket. You may then be treated akin to a criminal who does the following:
Firearms & Prohibited Weapons: A criminal who manufactures, sells, or imports realistic imitation firearms can attract maximum Level 5 summary penalties.
Wildlife & Animal Offences: The maximum summary conviction fine for a criminal who commits severe wildlife crimes, such as the illegal trade of endangered species, starts at Level 5.
Corporate Health & Safety: Under Sentencing Council guidelines, micro-businesses or small companies that commit Category 4 health and safety breaches with low culpability frequently receive starting-point fines in the region of £7,000.
Selling unlawful knives to persons under 18 can incur Level 5.
Environmental & Waste Crimes: Certain commercial waste disposal or landfill breaches (such as accepting prohibited waste) can result in standard fixed penalties or court-mandated fines starting in the thousands.
Having thrown the board over in this vitriolic attack, what accountability and success criteria are there for ministers to show how they have improved the rental market? After all, ministers are obliged to act in a fit and proper way and thus should be measured.
It seems reasonable to ask how the success of this clandestine policy will be evaluated and how accountability will be targeted to those responsible for the impending chaos.
There are some bad landlords and some bad tenants, but the Renters’ Rights Act appears wholly unsuitable as an effective solution.
What does the Property118 community think?
Thanks,
Paul
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Property managers set for Renters' Rights Act boost
3 weeks ago | 1 comments
1 month ago | 7 comments
Report form is not available.
Member Since February 2025 - Comments: 78
10:45 AM, 30th May 2026, About 4 days ago
Reply to the comment left by Paul Smith at 27/05/2026 – 08:53
The letter has to be served so the tenants know the new rules, but who is serving a letter on all the landlords so they know the new rules and can serve the letters on their tenants and avoid the fine? I spoke to a friend yesterday and found out he has one rental property and has not read the news for the past six months. He had another two business hours after I alerted him, to ring up his managing agents and find out if they’d served the notices. My brother’s family is renting and haven’t received the notice from their landlord.
Member Since January 2023 - Comments: 325
12:12 PM, 30th May 2026, About 4 days ago
I have resent my information sheet to my tenants as I am sure the council inspection I get next week will ask for proof so all properties under Licencing are at risk of £7K fine during inspection. Easy fine money for councils now as only a few hundred thousand have downloaded the sheet. Assume 50% covered by agent doing it on their behalf (assume 100% competence!!). That still leaves 49% LLs at risk. i.e the 1% of LLs that use this site will be OK.