1 year ago | 45 comments
In an unfair loophole, purpose-built student accommodation (PBSA) providers will be exempt from the Decent Homes Standard, whilst landlords will still have to follow the rules.
Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook has confirmed that the Renters’ Rights Bill will require PRS landlords to comply with the Decent Homes Standard.
If landlords fail to follow the rules, they could face fines of up to £40,000 and may even be required to pay tenants up to TWO years’ worth of rent.
The government says a consultation on the Decent Homes Standard for the private rented sector will happen as soon as possible and will set out the minimum requirements that all rented properties must meet.
Responding to a question from Labour MP Uma Kumaran asking about the student enforcement mechanisms to hold landlords accountable for non-compliance with housing standards in the student sector.
Mr Pennycook says the government is committed to improving housing quality for students and the Decent Homes Standard (DHS) will ensure student properties are safe, secure and hazard free.
However, purpose-built student accommodation providers will be excluded from following the Decent Homes Standard.
Mr Pennycook said: “The Bill will exempt Purpose Built Student Accommodation (PBSA) from the assured tenancy system if the landlord is signed up to a government-approved code of management practice. Such accommodation will therefore not be subject to the DHS, but landlords will need to meet rigorous standards set by the codes which are tailored to the needs of PBSA.
“This includes maintaining the safety of the accommodation, ensuring the property is well-managed and making sure there is an effective working relationship between tenants and managers.
“Members of the codes must also have robust procedures in place for handling complaints and remedying issues raised by students. Failure to meet these standards will result in membership being terminated, meaning the property will then be subject to the DHS.”
Mr Pennycook also confirmed landlords could have to pay up to TWO years’ rent if they fail to meet the Decent Homes Standard.
He said: “Tenants (and local authorities, where any rent has been paid via Universal Credit) will also be able to take direct action if landlords fail to comply with the Decent Homes Standards.
“Tenants can pursue a rent repayment order, meaning the responsible landlord will need to pay the tenant (or local authority) up to two years’ rent.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
The Different Types of Mortgages Available to Property InvestorsNext Article
Why choose The Home Insurer for landlord insurance?
1 year ago | 45 comments
1 year ago | 14 comments
1 year ago | 4 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2188 - Articles: 2
11:42 AM, 28th December 2024, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Northernpleb at 28/12/2024 – 11:36
Nice to see someone who appreciates how our justice system is evolving.
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 467 - Articles: 1
1:47 PM, 28th December 2024, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by moneymanager at 24/12/2024 – 20:55
Good comments, thanks
Member Since July 2024 - Comments: 112
5:11 AM, 29th December 2024, About 1 year ago
@Vibha – when did you last rent in China? Firstly China is not communist. Rent is paid in advance and often 3, 6, 9, 12 months. 15 days late in rent the Landlord has the right to evict. In 2024 China pumped in USD$5.87 billion for affordable housing and has shared ownership schemes. 90% in urban areas own their own homes.
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 467 - Articles: 1
7:43 AM, 29th December 2024, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Disgrunteld Landlady at 29/12/2024 – 05:11
China with it’s stock markets and huge private corporations, albeit closely monitored and controlled by the party, is more a corporatist state than communist. Either way, with its close surveillance of its people I would not wish to live there.
Member Since July 2024 - Comments: 112
8:10 AM, 2nd January 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by David Lawrenson at 29/12/2024 – 07:43
David, try a search, UK is one of the most watched populations on the planet. US UK Germany China. Difference being we over hear have an exceptionally safe living environment. We are safe to walk the street day and night, even children are safe. Safety aside our crimes get attended to and solved unlike UK where police are too busy.