2 months ago | 4 comments
Landlords are being urged to familiarise themselves with the revamped Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS) after the government updated its guidance for landlords and letting agents.
The government updated its HHSRS landlord and agents guidance this month to clarify how the system works, following the introduction of the revamped framework in June.
Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook claims the revised HHSRS will make it easier for councils to crack down on landlords who fail to tackle serious hazards.
The HHSRS was overhauled for the first time in 20 years, with the number of hazards reduced from 29 to 21 after several hazards were combined.
One example is the new ‘falls on the level’ hazard, which brings together falls associated with baths, showers and other washing facilities with falls on level surfaces.
The revamped system also introduces baseline indicators, which provide suggested standards against which assessors can identify potential deficiencies in a property.
The guidance says: “Once the assessor has identified any deficiencies and selected the relevant hazard, they must now assess the likelihood of harm requiring medical intervention over the next 12 months. This requires something more serious than a minor scratch or bruise.
“The assessor must consider the likelihood of harm for someone in the most vulnerable age group rather than the actual occupant. The vulnerable group refers to an age group of individuals who are most susceptible to the harm outcomes from the hazard in question.
“For example, someone aged 65 or over is more likely to fall down the stairs. This is because assessing a house with the most vulnerable persons in mind ensures that the space is made safe not just for the current tenants, but for all potential occupants or visitors.
“The only exception to this is the assessment of “overcrowding and lack of living space” which determines whether the house is suitable for the current household.”
Assessors must also consider how serious the consequences could be if an incident occurs.
The revised guidance divides harm into four classes:
Each hazard is scored separately, meaning a property can have a mixture of Category 1 and Category 2 hazards.
The government have provided an example of a property having category 1 and 2 hazards in the guidance.
The guidance explains: “In an example, the lack of a properly installed heating system in a single-family house constructed between 1920 and 1945. The national average likelihood of harm for the excess cold hazard in all properties of this age is 1 in 500. Without a fixed heating system, this property will be considerably worse than the national average for the property age and type.
“In this case, the assessor has determined that the likelihood of harm over the next 12 months in this scenario is far higher than the national average. They determine that the likelihood is 1 in 10. The assessor decides not to change the average national spread-of-harm outcomes. Based on this information, the mathematical formula produces a score of 31,145. This score represents a high risk, it is a Category 1 hazard, and the local council has a duty to take action.”
Councils can now impose civil penalties of up to £7,000 for an initial Category 1 hazard, or issue a single penalty of up to £7,000 covering multiple breaches.
As previously reported by Property118, the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) has urged landlords to carry out regular inspections of their properties to make sure they are hazard-free.
12 comments on this article
A different perspective could help you spot an issue, avoid a mistake or find a better way forward. Read the comments and add your own views if you wish.
Next Article
Britain's most competitive rent hotspots revealed
2 months ago | 4 comments
2 months ago | 8 comments
Member Since June 2018 - Comments: 38
9:23 AM, 23rd September 2026, About 1 day ago
What’s next? Compulsory stairlifts? Surely places should be made safe for the current occupants, not for an imagined invalid who for any number of reasons would never be interested in renting the property?
Member Since October 2023 - Comments: 55
10:21 AM, 23rd September 2026, About 24 hours ago
Another one goes on the market for sale next week now that the tenant has moved out. I will soon be out of this madness and I can start to live a normal life once again.
Member Since November 2019 - Comments: 208
11:20 AM, 23rd September 2026, About 23 hours ago
I am a bit confused
Do we have to remove the Baths so the tenant cannot slip in it ? Or move all beds down stairs so they cannot fall down the Stairs ?
If tenant slips in bath is it £7000 for the Council ?
Member Since September 2022 - Comments: 214
12:01 PM, 23rd September 2026, About 22 hours ago
Wow you really could not make this up.
Now as a recently retired Paramedic ( Good guy ) and long time HMO Landlord ( Evil 😈 Guy )
I am totally amazed that an Assessor can tell if a Tenant can suffer a mild heart attack due to living conditions !
Now I drove a BIG Yellow van full of medical kit including a £12,000 Defibrillator and lots of drugs, equipment and other monitoring kit such as BP machine, Oxygen sats, Blood sugar etc
After a 39 year career even I could not assess someone for a Mild heart attack
So I would take them to hospital
Member Since May 2014 - Comments: 166
12:03 PM, 23rd September 2026, About 22 hours ago
Displacing landlords in the same vein as the indigenous population is being displaced..
Member Since July 2023 - Comments: 207
1:51 PM, 23rd September 2026, About 20 hours ago
“The assessor must consider the likelihood of harm for someone in the most vulnerable age group rather than the actual occupant.”
Taken to its logical conclusion I take it we ‘may’ have to make all properties suitable for a tenant with reduced mobility and/or increased morbidity?
I think that even our court system may have difficulty with this, hence why its all £7K FPNs.
?
I’ve not been too much in the ‘selling up now’ camp in response to the deluge of regulation. However this one has the potential to finish everyone off.
Member Since June 2018 - Comments: 38
1:59 PM, 23rd September 2026, About 20 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Northernpleb at 23/09/2026 – 11:20
Or is it £7,000 for the council if the existing or future tenant *might* slip?
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 960
2:07 PM, 23rd September 2026, About 20 hours ago
Councils telling tenants not to leave has caused disturbance of my sleep – apparently that’s serious harm. Any solicitors out there willing to sue the council for me?
Member Since April 2026 - Comments: 3
2:49 PM, 23rd September 2026, About 19 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by DAMIEN RAFFERTY at 23/09/2026 – 12:01
Seems like a form of pseudo- science designed to facilitate an easy revenue stream for the council. I thought that ‘ good landlords have nothing to fear “ ?
The rules seem to be changing on a whim ; a ‘ road map ‘ into the unknown for landlords who having addressed issues in good faith, now find the goal posts changed. Again. This is surely tantamount to entrapment ? Today’s new handrail fitted at a cost of £500 will be in breach tomorrow because it’s one millimetre too proud of the wall. Fine. Replace. Rinse and repeat. This is beyond belief and a form of bureaucratic terrorism and bullying.
Member Since September 2022 - Comments: 214
5:24 PM, 23rd September 2026, About 17 hours ago
I have tried to read some of the new HHSRS ” Guidance system which will crack down on Landlords ” to quote the housing minister number 16 in the last 16 years.
At no point did the Government HHSRS team actually speak to a Landlord or even a Landlord association such as the NRLA .
The experts involved live in a very different world to the one that the rest of the UK lives in.
Fall hazard if anything is more than 5mm difference in height !
Please check for yourself as the threshold into most front doors, and each room is often higher than this.
Will we be required to install ramps and wide electric operated doors in your Rental ?
Hoists and tracking from the bedroom into the extra large bathroom with special bath
I have seen and worked in homes that have this but this new guidance with a £7,000 Fine could apply to every single Rental in the country
We shall wait and see what happens 😏