Landlord Licensing Schemes – Raising Standards or Raising Funds?

Landlord Licensing Schemes – Raising Standards or Raising Funds?

9:41 AM, 9th August 2013, About 11 years ago 118

Text Size

WARNING – this article might make you want to cry, it might make you want to laugh and it will probably make you angry, and for many different reasons depending on who you are. Licensing - Raising Standards or Raising Funds?

This is one of those articles which I would like to be read by every landlord, every letting agent, every tenant and especially every Politician.

I would also like every person who reads this article to leave a comment, share it and help turn it into a HUGE debate.

So what is it all about?

My friend Mary Latham recently wrote a book about the storm she see’s brewing which is heading towards the Private Rented Sector with potentially catastrophic consequences. One of the chapters in Mary’s book is called “Raising Standards or Raising funds”.

There have been many discussions about the effectiveness of licensing which is being introduced into the PRS in it’s various forms and on many occasions, landlords have concluded that licencing has very little to do with raising standards and more to do with Local Authorities raising funds to create “jobs for the boys”

Well you may be pleased to hear that the DCLG have asked Local Authorities to complete a survey about licencing. Have they read Mary’s book one wonders?

When I heard about the survey, intrigue and curiosity got the better of me – what questions were the DCLG asking?

To my surprise,  I managed to get hold of a link to the survey questionnaire, DCLG had used ‘open source’ software for their survey. Being the curious type I obviously felt compelled to take a look, fully expecting to be met with a security screen where I would have to enter a User Name and Password to get any further. I’d have given up at that point as there’s no way I would attempt to hack a Government website. To my surprise though, there was no security! They were using Survey Monkey and that awoke the little monkey in me.

To see the questions being asked I needed to complete the page I was looking at to get to the next set of questions, so I began to fill it in. This is the point at which my curiosity transformed into mischief as I was having a lot of fun with my answers 😉

Here was my opportunity to tell the DCLG what I really think about landlord licencing in the most cynical and mischievous way possible. What an opportunity!

Now before you think about attacking me with some “holier than though” type comments, please remember the DCLG are responsible for the drafting of all of the legislation which has caused the PRS so much grief. Anyhow, enough said on that, it’s done now.

I took screen shots of every page I completed and I have put them together in a slideshow below.

Do take a look and whether you laugh or cry and for whatever reason you get angry, please post a comment or join in the discussion below this article 😉

If I mysteriously disappear, you might just find me at the Tower of London LOL

I hope you will appreciate the irony of my answers!

[thethe-image-slider name=”Raising Funds or Raising Standards”]

Note for tenants – More licensing = higher rents!


Share This Article


Comments

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

9:56 AM, 11th August 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Sharon Crossland" at "11/08/2013 - 09:00":

If he is bankrupt, how can he still be causing you problems? Does the trustee in bankruptcy know about the property he owns which is causing you problems?
.

10:01 AM, 11th August 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Ben Reeve-Lewis" at "11/08/2013 - 08:57":

Ben, I really sympathise with you on this. Both my partner (as the resident freeholder) and myself as the resident manager) are the front line on our block due to our visibility and have been assaulted too many times to remember, by tenants and their visitors!

Black eyes, gouges, scratches, bruises, sprained ligaments, heads being slammed against brick walls, kicks in the head, we have suffered all these because landlords don't want to deal with their anti-social tenants! Landlords also don't want to be subjected to this and they won't because they often don't live on the same block as their tenants. We however do and if we didn't deal with them, no one would!

Mark Alexander - Founder of Property118

10:11 AM, 11th August 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Ben Reeve-Lewis" at "11/08/2013 - 09:46":

That's what society as a whole wants Ben, as somebody else has said on this thread, society should pay for that, NOT good landlords.

If you could co-opt in some of the Council's clipboard crowd to help (the EHO's I've described in my last post) that would be good too. How those EHO's get away with persecuting and vilifying good landlords whilst there are still real criminals out there operating in the sector beggars belief.
.
.

Mark Reynolds

10:20 AM, 11th August 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Ben Reeve-Lewis" at "11/08/2013 - 08:57":

Ben, having spent many many years at local government level I know only too well the pressure you are under, I also know the pressures that some housing officers, not you, are under when deciding what to have for dinner that evening!

Reading your input over the last few years I know you are a highly experienced and effective Housing Officer but I have many questions for the Local Authority round here regarding selective licensing. The most important one being...

When I am a licensed landlord, I am assuming that one of the conditions of my licence would be to deal with any ASB effectively. So lets say that becomes an issue, I issue the correct notice(s) which are correctly filled out to remove the problem tenant. They take the notice to the council as they are at risk of being made homeless. What are the council going to say?

PS - There is not danger of my properties being poorly managed or in a poor state of repair - You're welcome to come and inspect them any time 🙂

Ben Reeve-Lewis

10:24 AM, 11th August 2013, About 11 years ago

Yeah I'm with you on that Mark. And I'm not saying that council's arent free from blame or incompetence, as I mentioned somewhere back in this post, joined up working could achieve much of what needs to be done and probably without much of an increase in manpower.

But remember EHOs have to implement the laws passed down to them by government and senior council officials. Ask and enforcement officer about some of the things they have to do and what they think about it.

What often happens is a referral about a property is made by someone who is only marginally involved in the business, maybe in the voluntary sector, or following a complaint mad to councillors or MPs who dont go out and see what is going on. Then we get involved and raise our eyes, having often seen much worse. In fact my EHOs will often try to protect landlords from daft complaints. Most commonly I hear them say "Oh he isnt that bad" or "It's certainly not the worst property I've seen", and they give time and a bit of slack to let the landlord get it done. Its the ones who try to evade them or pull the wool over their eyes that they go for, as do I.

@Sharon, thanks for the support. What galls me is I get it from both ends, landlords and tenants. Makes me go home at the end of a week sometimes saying "F**k the lot of you". Although a landlady bought me a bottle of single malt whisky this week for helping me get her deposit back from an agent who had let her flat out as a cannabis farm and were holding onto the money. So I'm leaning slghtly landlord this weekend haha

Mark Reynolds

10:31 AM, 11th August 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Ben Reeve-Lewis" at "11/08/2013 - 10:24":

Thanks Ben

The question I asked above about managing the ASB within the property was one to all local authorities - Out of interest what would the view of your boroughs housing team be?

Ben Reeve-Lewis

10:34 AM, 11th August 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Mark Reynolds" at "11/08/2013 - 10:20":

Haha Your not wrong Mark. That drives me mad too. There is an element of council mindset that is about jobs for life regardless of what you do. That is changing though. The writing is on the wall but few have noticed that they arent safe anymore.

And it is difficult to get councils to take a coherent line on anything. A while back a landlrod came to me for advice, running an HMO full of women where one kept putting threatening notices up in the kitchen for the others and eventually pulled a gun on them. Cops were called etc but the landlord, being a responsible and decent guy wanted to know the fastest way to get this nutbag out of everyone's hair. He wanted to do it legally.

I advised that S21 would be guaranteed but would take longer and given the seriousness of the situation S8 (ground 14)would be faster. Of course that is a more complex route so I said I would help him fill in the forms and get it all in order.

The tenant found out and complained to the council about me advising a landlord how to evict her properly. I got carpetted over it, someone in complaints, who had no clue about the real life situation telling me I was out of order and backing up a woman who pulled a gun on her housemates.

My reply was.....well, lets say quite forthright haha

Mark Reynolds

10:41 AM, 11th August 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Ben Reeve-Lewis" at "11/08/2013 - 10:34":

Thanks Ben - It interesting though that the councils very often say stay put when tenants are faced with eviction - Which is against national guidelines surely? Or is it a case that the front desk officers providing the advice are not trained or updated sufficiently?

Ben Reeve-Lewis

10:43 AM, 11th August 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Mark Reynolds" at "11/08/2013 - 10:31":

Well Mark you arent legally responsible for the actions of your tenants unless you somehow encourage or support the actions. When complaints come to me from housemates about housemates I advise the same thing. Sometimes ASB teams try to tell landlords that they have to deal with a problem among their tenants. I advise this is wrong. It may be good practice but if a landlord doesnt act then we cant act against them.

Nuisance caused by bad properties is another matter though.

Comment on my colleagues?????? Are you mad?????

Mark Reynolds

10:50 AM, 11th August 2013, About 11 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Ben Reeve-Lewis" at "11/08/2013 - 10:43":

Are you mad????? - Not anymore I have been discharged! haha!!

I may not be legally responsible but if they demand I get licensed surely this will be part of the license conditions, otherwise I may be subject to a fine or prosecution?

Question to everyone now, is selective/additional licensing likely to rub up against other regulations/laws where the two are pulling against each other? For example in Bens' example where landlords are not legally responsible for ASB which is what Selective Licensing is intended to curb?

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now