The issue of costs that are the responsibility of the tenant?16:06 PM, 30th July 2019
About 3 weeks ago 50
Angie and Dan are very successful landlords by most peoples’ standards. By 2015 they had amassed a property empire worth £10,000,000 with only £4,400,000 of mortgages. That’s just 44% LTV.
For several years, Dan and Angie had been drawing just £90,000 between them and using the rest of their profits (after paying tax at 45%) to pay down their mortgages.
However, being 45% additional rate tax payers, the thought of paying an extra 25% tax on their mortgage interest by 2020 made them angry, so they set about a strategy to reduce their borrowing even faster.
They had already identified their most expensive mortgages and were paying those down first. However, the tax changes inspired them to sell the properties their most expensive mortgages were secured against instead. This amounted to £3,000,000 in property values and £2,000,000 of mortgage debt. The base cost of the properties was £2,000,000 hence there was a capital gain of £1,000,000 which was taxed at 28%, i.e £280,000 when the sales completed.
The outcome was that Angie and Dan had reduced their mortgages to £2,400,000 on a portfolio worth £7,000,000. Their LTV had reduced to 34.3% and they had £720,000 cash to reduce their mortgages further to £1,680,000, giving them an LTV of just 24%. They had planned to repeat this until they had no mortgages at all.
However, they have now learned that none of this was necessary. They needn’t have paid £280,000 of CGT and they certainly didn’t need to pay 45% tax on the money they had been using to pay down their mortgages.
By incorporating their business they could have ‘washed out’ all of those gains by rolling them over into shares in their own company and claiming section 162 incorporation relief. Furthermore, they would only pay 19% corporation tax and another 7.5% tax on their dividend incomes between £11,500 and £45,000 each. Their net effective tax rate on their incomes would have been just under 25% on this basis, and reducing over the next two years due to the phased reduction in corporation tax rates.
But it gets even more interesting for the following reasons.
REASON ONE – Previously, where Angie and Dan had been paying 45% tax on profits used to pay down debt, they could have been paying just 19% corporation tax. That’s £26,000 less tax on every £100,000 of rental profit used to reduce debt
REASON TWO – the additional 25% tax they would have been paying on mortgage interest by 2020 does not apply to incorporated landlords
REASON THREE – if they had sold the exact same properties the day after incorporation, none of the £280,000 of CGT would have been payable. Therefore, they could have used the full £1,000,000 of net sale proceeds to pay down their debts.
Ah …. but…. I hear you cry; what about the CGT and Stamp Duty they would have incurred at the point of incorporation?
Well ……… because Angie and Dan had always traded together with a view to making a profit, and due to the time and effort they could show they commit to their “business”, they would have been entitled to claim incorporation relief to negate these taxes.
There are obviously rules to consider but these are all explained in a presentation you can download for just £20.
Don’t you think Dan and Angie might be feeling a little hard done by now?
Do you think they might now decide to pay for proper advice on the basis that it has already cost them £280,000 + not to?Show Form To Book A Tax Planning Consultation
Please Log-In OR Become a member to reply to comments or subscribe to new comment notifications.
Our mission is to facilitate the sharing of best practice amongst UK landlords, tenants and letting agentsLearn More