0:02 AM, 17th July 2025, About 4 months ago 7
Text Size
Categories:
Landlord organisation iHowz expresses disappointment over the Chancellor “side-stepping” the private rented sector in Mansion House speech.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves failed to mention the private rented sector once in her speech at Mansion House in London as she announced mortgage reforms to help first-time buyers.
Industry experts warn the reforms do not go far enough to help the housing market.
Ms Reeves announced that Nationwide will widen access to its ‘Helping Hand’ mortgage, supporting an additional 10,000 first-time buyers annually.
Eligible first-time buyers can now apply with a £30,000 salary, down from £35,000, and joint applicants with a £50,000 combined salary, down from £55,000. She also highlighted the creation of a permanent mortgage guarantee scheme.
In her speech, Ms Reeves said: “I welcome the recent changes the Financial Policy Committee has announced to the loan-to-income limit on mortgage lending, which the PRA and FCA are implementing immediately.
“That means tens of thousands more people could be able to get a mortgage in the next year alone, with Nationwide already offering its ‘Helping Hand’ mortgage to more first-time buyers, supporting an additional 10,000 each year.”
However, iHowz claim the speech offered little reassurance for landlords.
Peter Littlewood, chief executive of iHowz, tells Property118: “Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ Mansion House speech focused on supporting first-time buyers through mortgage guarantees, offering little for landlords. There was no mention of tax relief, rental reform, or landlord regulation.
“While iHowz welcome measures to help first time buyers and home movers to secure larger loans, it would be good to see similar flexibility applied to lending practice for older landlords, who often struggle to secure competitive rates, even from existing lenders.”
Mr Littlewood adds that the government’s investment plans are also disappointing, with the Chancellor focusing on stocks and shares ISAs rather than addressing the private rented sector.
Mr Littlewood adds: “On investments, we are disappointed that despite the government encouraging investment in a wider range of investments, such as blockchain and private equity, rented residential housing remains a non-qualifying asset for pensions, except when held by Reits.
“Although economically reassuring, the speech sidestepped key concerns facing the private rental sector, leaving landlords awaiting further housing-specific announcements.”
Industry leaders welcome moves to help first-time buyers but warn it’s far from enough.
Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at Moneybox, said: “It is encouraging to see steps being taken to support first-time buyers. Enabling people to borrow more is not a silver bullet. What first-time buyers truly need is not just the ability to take on more debt, but meaningful, long-term support to help them start saving and investing earlier in life so they can build up that all-important deposit.”
Nick Sanderson, CEO at Audley Group, said the Chancellor should encourage downsizing among older homeowners.
He said: “Refreshed support for first time buyers will be welcomed, but it’s only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to fixing the UK’s housing market. The government’s blinkered focus on the start of the ladder ignores the fact that encouraging downsizing would prompt more movement in the market, freeing up houses for first-time buyers.
“With the number of people aged 65 and over expected to grow by 8.3 million by 2066, it’s crucial that our housing supports our population. Right now, the government is kicking the can down the road by only focussing on parts of the markets. Treating the market holistically would prompt the growth the Chancellor is so focused on. There’s no universal solution, but without swift and decisive action, the housing market will continue to drift in the wrong direction.”
Previous Article
Rents rise 6.7% in June while house prices grow by 3.9%Next Article
Accord and TMW cut BTL mortgage rates for landlords
Frank Jennings
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up10:10 AM, 17th July 2025, About 4 months ago
I have a few ideas that would help the UK. How about removing all career politicians from office?
We could make it a rule that if a person wishes to become an MP, then they must have done a manual job for at least 10 years, or have run a successful business in the past, for at least 10 years.
We could half MP’s salary or put them on the same wage as junior Dr’s £15 an hour.
We could do the same with the house of lords, or even get rid of them altogether.
We could ensure we only get quality MP’s by making a law, that if an MP’s CV is found to be a falsehood or a fabrication, then they are removed from office and can never become a MP again?
We could make a law to remove any civil servants who demontrate that they are not impartial in dealing with govenment issues.
We could do the same with judges and police chief’s or anyone in high office of any govenment department.
We could remove any MP that does not demonstrate that they have the best intrests of the UK at heart.
Can anybody else make any more suggestions?
Blodwyn
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up10:29 AM, 17th July 2025, About 4 months ago
I have been banging on about the lack of life work experience amongst the wonks who stand for Parliament for years AND an age of 30 qualification.
As to the elderly (I am 80) down sizing, exempt us from Stamp Duty and many more of us may move!!!
JB
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up11:22 AM, 17th July 2025, About 4 months ago
Sounds good to me. There will be more buyers around to buy the properties I’m selling.
Heaven help renters – though it’s not my problem
JeggNegg
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up16:55 PM, 17th July 2025, About 4 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Frank Jennings at 17/07/2025 – 10:10
What if any qualifications does an MP require?
To hold a position that could effect everyone in the country and earn a basic salary since April 2025 of £93,904 pa.
That’s a lot of cash irrespective of making good or incorrect decisions!
I wonder if they think rhey work more hours a year than many landlords?
Blodwyn
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up20:50 PM, 17th July 2025, About 4 months ago
It’s what you do with your hours that matters. Quality not quantity, mere bulk of getting it not quite right.
I prefer an Andrew Griffith sort of MP with plenty life experience and job achievement to Mad Monk Miliband riding his mad stallion Net Zero and trampling all in his giddy path?
Robin Wilson
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up17:59 PM, 5th August 2025, About 3 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Frank Jennings at 17/07/2025 – 10:10
They should introduce fixed terms for MPs so that they don’t make decisions that are motivated by getting re-elected. So, after 5 years there would be a completely new parliament, new cabinet and new prime minister.
In this scenario, the party political system would enable decisions to be made in the national interest, when they are often unpopular, but necessary.
Blodwyn
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up18:40 PM, 5th August 2025, About 3 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Robin Wilson at 05/08/2025 – 17:59
I’m afraid it won’t work in real life, however admirable the idea. Neither major Party has acquitted itself well for over a decade and more but I suspect a whirlpool of old new old new will only a worse mess and muddle than we have now.
Save a few exceptions, the quality of both major Front Benches is lamentable. No depth, little experience of either real life or a proper job. As my late Mother said, “No Bottom!”