Is £250 ground rent increase an issue?

Is £250 ground rent increase an issue?

0:02 AM, 29th November 2023, About 6 months ago 76

Text Size

Hello, one of my leasehold flats just had a Ground Rent increase which takes it over £250.

I’ve heard that ‘lenders’ do not like it when GR passes £250 and, when/if selling this may cause problems for future purchasers to get mortgages.

I have 130 years left on the lease, does anybody have experience on whether the £250 limit is a serious issue?

Any help would be greatly appreciated,

David

 


Share This Article


Comments

Amethyst

22:02 PM, 11th December 2023, About 5 months ago

The problem is they are all in it together and they just cannot help themselves. From the solicitors who do not advise about the implications of an apartment that is already at the magic figure of £250pa at the point of sale, to the Freeholder who sells the Freehold on to another investor who just so happens to have a subsidiary company collecting Ground Rents. Add to this the Managing Agent who just happens to have another arm as a Social Housing provider thus ensuring all those 'hard to place' tenants are placed in the vacant properties created because of repossessions and evictions. Include in the mix, the Managing Agent who sends contractors from Cheshire to Bradford properties ( I wonder why!!) with the high SC and you see why people refer to it as fleecehold and are campaigning for change.

Contango

1:16 AM, 12th December 2023, About 5 months ago

Get stuck in. No ground landlord aspires to running the management Frankly it is a burden. The law gives you the right to take it on . Don't sit moaning about how awful the ground landlords are get involved. Form a board. Get on with it.

Kizzie

8:46 AM, 12th December 2023, About 5 months ago

In response to Contango re GR.
GR is due under CLRA 2002 s.166 and is not a bargain negotiated. It is required under Law of Property Act 1925 to indicate the title to the lease to a flat is out of a freehold title and indicates the existence of a lessor/landlord and the
service charge for repair to the common parts of the building has protection under landlord & tenant legislation a contribution and tax exempt. Otherwise this cost becomes a taxable imposed charge (rent) and tenant legal rights to reasonable level of service charge lost allowing return of Rachmann style exploitation.

Amethyst

13:31 PM, 12th December 2023, About 5 months ago

NewYorkie

14:33 PM, 12th December 2023, About 5 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Amethyst at 12/12/2023 - 13:31
Yes, SO is a truly awful tenure. Rather like Help to Buy, because there's a taxpayer funded element, the purchase price is exaggerated, which is likely to lead to negative equity. The leaseholder may only hold 25% of the lease, but must pay 100% of the service charge. If it's 'shared' ownership [buyer owns nothing!], why aren't the costs shared?

NewYorkie

14:35 PM, 12th December 2023, About 5 months ago

Reply to the comment left by Contango at 12/12/2023 - 01:16
I've done it, twice, and been a share of freehold company secretary for a block [as opposed to 2 flats in a house!]. I know what I'm talking about.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now