0:01 AM, 10th March 2025, About a month ago 4
Text Size
Propertymark letting agents argue “overly restrictive regulations” will hurt supply and drive up rent prices.
Propertymark members are warning members of the House of Lords that the Renters’ Rights Bill could make it difficult for people to find affordable housing and are urging Lords members to make sure the Bill “is fair and balanced for both landlords and tenants.”
More than 250 letters and emails from Propertymark have been sent to Lords members, urging them to extend the deposit cap for renting with pets and address concerns about the abolition of fixed-term tenancies.
The industry body says many members have raised issues around the abolition of Section 21 and the lack of court capacity to deal with possessions.
Propertymark members argue the removal of Section 21 will increase costs for landlords to regain possession of their properties.
The industry body also raises the impact of deposit caps when renting with pets.
According to Propertymark, 57% of landlords and agents are unable to recoup the costs of pet damage.
The industry body has urged the extension of the deposit cap to support the UK government’s amendment to tackle the issue of rent in advance, as well as allow more landlords to meet the additional risk and cost of having pets in the property.
Timothy Douglas, head of policy and campaigns at Propertymark, says the government needs to provide a clear map of when the Renters’ Rights Bill will become law.
He said: “There also needs to be a clear roadmap of when the changes will be implemented as well as a full assessment conducted of the resources councils need to regulate the private rented sector effectively, with new burdens funding then allocated accordingly.
“Propertymark recognises that the UK government’s intention is to protect renters and provide them with greater security. However, there is a real concern from letting agents that overly restrictive regulations will reduce the supply of rental homes, drive up rent prices and make it even more difficult for people to find affordable housing.”
Despite some House of Lords members introducing amendments which could hurt the private rented sector , many members have put forward proposals that address key concerns.
One of the amendments includes fixed-term tenancies to continue if both the landlord and the tenant agree. The Lords have also challenged the repossession ground 4A that allows landlords to recover possession of an HMO that is let to full-time students with an amendment to remove this requirement and ensure the ground is applicable to non-HMO student accommodation.
Other amendments include still allowing smaller landlords with five or less properties to still issue Section 21 notices and requiring tenants to provide an additional pet damage deposit equivalent to three weeks’ rent under Section 13 of the Bill.
Mr Douglas praises members of the House of Lords for listening to concerns from landlords and letting agents.
He said: “Whilst it is in the UK government’s hands to amend the Renters’ Rights Bill, it is positive to see that members of the House of Lords are listening to the concerns of letting agents and the wider sector.
“As a professional membership body, we exist to represent our members, and it is great to see so many members engage with our campaigning and contact Peers outlining their knowledge and experience from working in the sector. Change is coming but what’s important is that the legislation is evidence based and fit for purpose.
“It’s good to see that a series of sensible proposed amendments have been brought forward and it’s now vital that the UK government listen and take action to ensure the Bill strikes a fair balance between not only tenants’ rights but agents and landlords too.”
Beaver
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up10:28 AM, 10th March 2025, About a month ago
The proposals to force all landlords to meet EPC band C will reduce supply and drive up rents. It would be better to allow any tenant to rent a band D property, or even a Band E property if they want to, and reform the EPC system so that tenants get meaningful information from it. Logically a Band D property would then rent for less than a Band C property but this wouldn't risk supply. Anything else will hurt tenants.
On the comment:
"One of the amendments includes fixed-term tenancies to continue if both the landlord and the tenant agree. "
I have let to tenants on a 5-6 month let before when the tenants needed accommodation because their own houses had been flooded. The government needs to be careful not to stop landlords and tenants coming to an agreement for a short-term let because there will be properties that could be let out for less than year but won't be if the landlords can be sure that they can get their properties back, e.g. working away, travelling etc. Stopping this practice will restrict supply and exacerbate shortages of accommodation.
Reluctant Landlord
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up14:04 PM, 10th March 2025, About a month ago
Reply to the comment left by Beaver at 10/03/2025 - 10:28
to be fair in a fixed term agreement there is still no guarantee the tenant will move out on the agreed termination date but I see the point being made.
In the cases of flooding etc, then the insurance would not pay for any alternative accommodation past the point the property is ready to move back into, so in this example the chances are you would regain possession when expected.
Beaver
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up14:20 PM, 10th March 2025, About a month ago
Reply to the comment left by Reluctant Landlord at 10/03/2025 - 14:04
Flooding is the issue I've encountered, but I've known others rent their houses out to go travelling, for sabbaticals, or to work abroad. If the risk of doing this is too great then this will affect supply of accommodation to the market place.
As part of their discussions, the House of Lords would be as well to consider those families who rent their homes out under the rent-a-room scheme and who are presently restricted to renting part of their home out to family members from one other family. If you have to be a HMO to rent rooms out in your own home many people just won't bother. This also affects the supply of accommodation to students, tenants, prospective tenants and migrants of all types.
Northernpleb
Become a Member
If you login or become a member you can view this members profile, comments and posts!
Sign Up17:40 PM, 10th March 2025, About a month ago
So many rules, so many regulations , So much taxation , So many things to be fined for. =
So few Houses to rent