Harassment and illegal eviction claim - not yet gone to tribunal?

Harassment and illegal eviction claim – not yet gone to tribunal?

Tenant dispute with landlord over harassment and eviction issues highlighted by unhappy face rating scale.
12:01 AM, 9th September 2025, 8 months ago 13

Hello, I’m a landlord managing a tenancy situation that has gone badly wrong. We’ve been hit with a letter before action and a claim for rent repayment but it’s not been filed for yet. It’s for harassment and illegal eviction by K.

Here’s the background: a few days after moving into a single tenancy style property, K made a formal complaint about another longstanding tenant in the room next door to her, E, who had a history of harassing people which K can document being reported by previous tenants. In our response to K we disputed this fact which I realise looks very bad.

E routinely made bizarre and inflammatory allegations about things K had yet to do or claimed malicious intent which K clearly didn’t have (ie next, K planned to stop E from reading the Bible or praying after K politely asked if E could avoid waking her up between 3:30 and 5:30am by slamming doors as this was a daily issue because of E’s shift work. K is Catholic and so is her partner, so you see how E’s complaints look very odd). K regularly sent us videos of E slamming doors with far more force than necessary, seemingly with the intent of waking her up at these strange hours, which made K very sleep deprived. K also had recordings of E trying to assault her, witness statements and records of other tenants complaining about E’s threatening behaviour sent to us (which I stupidly lied about) and K claimed she had a heart issue exacerbated by E’s conduct that K didn’t mention on her housing application. We’ve dismissed this in our response to her request for confirmation but she did routinely email us about it.

However the complaints on both sides got too much so we told K she could leave before the fourth month of her tenancy or be evicted. We told her this at month three and this forms her claim of harassment and illegal eviction. She said she felt coerced out the property. We even told her, over email, that we were doing this to “avoid being seen as taking sides” which she’s claiming makes this retaliatory.

Big snag: we ignored K’s requests for mediation (E refused, but we warned K of this over email before asking as that’s just what E is like) or alternative dispute resolution, and never updated her at all about a chat we had with E. K asked to be moved kitchens away from her shared one with E but we forgot to respond to this, even though K spent four months asking us. In our correspondence with K after her letter before action, we claimed that we had multiple chats with E. We cannot prove this and K was reasonably under the impression nothing had been done.

When it seemed like E was going anyways, we told K not to worry anymore apologised for the stress, said she could stay and we mistakenly told her we had served a Section 21 notice, but had in fact withdrawn it. She left anyway and this ultimately left her homeless. She claimed she had no trust in us and couldn’t be sure that we wouldn’t do something like this again, but we’ve told her the S21 claim was an “innocent mistake”.

Another snag: in corresponding with K, we’ve accidentally leaked the status of E’s tenancy and K, who previously filed a DSAR that we forgot about and sent back too late, said she wants to contact the ICO.

K has now issued us a letter before action and also council support, so it’s likely she will pursue the claim. She incurred moving costs, experienced stress and disruption, and her self-employment was affected. Her rent was £800 per month and she’s requested that we pay her back 4 months rent, the entire period she was there for. She claims that as E bullied her the entire tenancy (and we claimed that only young professionals lived in the property, when E is in fact 40 years older) and she couldn’t use the communal areas without fear of assault so was paying for a house she couldn’t use.

We are now considering settlement to resolve the dispute quickly, but the situation has raised serious questions about where we went wrong, the impact of ignoring mediation requests and Section 21 rules.

Please help me as I’ve told K I won’t be settling as we never actually served her a S21, we could have stayed, and E raised complaints about her too (albeit ridiculous ones we never told K about at all). K has got evidence for everything she needs, so what seems like a good settlement number if she’s asking for £5k for the RRO and damages?

Thank you,

J


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since September 2024 - Comments: 95

    11:05 AM, 9th September 2025, About 8 months ago

    “E, who had a history of harassing people”
    I don’t understand why E wasn’t the person who was evicted, long before K’s tenancy even started.
    On my opinion you have treated K terribly.
    You need proper legal representation to extricate yourself at minimum cost to yourself.

  • Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1642 - Articles: 3

    11:31 AM, 9th September 2025, About 8 months ago

    Wow! You’ve really messed this up by ‘ignoring’ the wrong tenant and making daft mistakes with process. Sounds like K could have a ‘no win, no pay’ solicitor. You could pay for legal advice, but I suspect the response will be to offer to settle and move on.

  • Member Since February 2023 - Comments: 7

    11:34 PM, 9th September 2025, About 8 months ago

    I’m sorry but if you’re looking for sympathy I think you’ve come to the wrong place it’s people like you that have pushed governments to bring in even more legislation which is going to hit the decent landlord and agent, if you had any decency whatsoever you would just pay the woman apologize and move on

  • Member Since December 2024 - Comments: 4

    8:14 AM, 10th September 2025, About 8 months ago

    Unfortunately you sound just like the incompetent bad landlord we are all labelled as. This is entirely of your own making. I think you should cough up and leave the sector altogether!@

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 754

    10:57 AM, 10th September 2025, About 8 months ago

    Just pay up and be done with it. From what you’ve admitted here, if it gets into a legal situation you would get short shrift from a Judge or other solicitor.

    You will only spend money on legal fees and potentially have to pay up even more than requested, so worse off overall.

  • Member Since February 2024 - Comments: 65

    6:26 PM, 10th September 2025, About 8 months ago

    As others have said, you knew E was an issue, yet lied to K about them and then failed to support her when it went sideways?

    If I were you I’d settle this by agreeing to give her back her full rent and deposit on the condition it’s in full and final settlement of any matter relating to the tenancy.

    If K accepts you can think yourself lucky, then get out of the business!

  • Member Since March 2025 - Comments: 4

    11:30 PM, 10th September 2025, About 7 months ago

    Many times you admit to ignoring things or not giving out relevant information, and basically not being truthful. I think if K settles with you just pay what she asks for and you’ve got off lightly. You sound like the sort of landlord that gives other landlords a bad name!

  • Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1642 - Articles: 3

    8:31 AM, 11th September 2025, About 7 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Gabrielle Wright at 10/09/2025 – 23:30
    This story is so bad, I wonder if it’s fake.

  • Member Since September 2025 - Comments: 4

    11:57 AM, 11th September 2025, About 7 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Gabrielle Wright at 10/09/2025 – 23:30
    Hmmm. So K provided us this text with another tenant, also on her floor, who moved out two week’s into K’s tenancy. They said this, and K provided us this statement in early May: “E was quite confrontational and, at times, borderline harassing toward me. She would send long messages criticizing how I cleaned, which felt very demeaning. She would also mutter curses under her breath if I didn’t do exactly what she asked. On top of that, she was often rude about our other housemate behind his back. I raised the issue with [me], but ultimately decided not to pursue it further because I wanted to avoid a major conflict at home.”

    K said this in her LBA: “Moreover, prior to signing the tenancy agreement, I was not informed I would be living with E, a tenant nearly forty years my senior with a known history of reported harassment. Instead, I was misled that
    the property was occupied by “young professionals” by your office. This omission breaches Regulation 6 of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, which prohibits withholding material information likely to influence consumer decisions.:

    This is in our response to her LBA, where she claimed we knew about the harrassment and lied about E’s age: “You were informed that other tenants had lived in the property for several years. There is no reported history of serious harassment.”

    How does this all look if we were to take it to court? And what should our lawyer be saying?

  • Member Since September 2025 - Comments: 4

    12:00 PM, 11th September 2025, About 7 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Steve Rose at 09/09/2025 – 11:05
    Nobody else had these sorts of issues (or not to this degree anyway!) with E. But K said that everyone else told her they hid in their rooms, barely cooked, to avoid E. K has a background as a teacher and took a very, “no thank you!” and “please apologise” approach, perhaps the first time E had ever dealt with someone like this, which we can hear in the recording. We’ve said she can be heard pressuring E in response, but in retrospect I’m not sure how that would hold up as a defence for E then nearly assaulting her.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or