7 months ago | 9 comments
The government claims the Renters’ Rights Act provides councils with strong enforcement powers to crack down on rental discrimination.
Under the act, it is illegal for landlords and letting agents to discriminate against prospective tenants who receive benefits or have children, with fines of up to £7,000 for those who break the rules.
The news comes as the government has also announced that landlords will face on-the-spot fines of £7,000 for severe damp and mould.
In a written parliamentary question, Labour MP Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi asked: “What assessment has been made of the adequacy of legislative protections against discrimination during the application process for prospective tenants for privately rented residential accommodation?”.
Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook said in response the government will continue to monitor rental discrimination in the private rented sector.
He said: “The Renters’ Rights Act provides local authorities with strong investigatory and enforcement powers to bear down on rental discrimination practices in the private rented sector.
“It addresses both overt discriminatory practices, such as ‘No DSS’ adverts, and situations where landlords or letting agents use other indirect practices in order to prevent someone entering into a tenancy.
“My Department continues to monitor trends across the private rented sector and is conducting a robust evaluation of the impact of the Renters’ Rights Act. Evaluation reports will be published two and five years after implementation.”
As previously reported by Property118, the government has announced a new data collection strategy to monitor the private rented sector (PRS).
In a policy paper published by the government, ministers said the strategy is intended to assess how the Renters’ Rights Act will affect the PRS following the legislation coming into force.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
EPC upgrades could cost landlords £11,713Next Article
Buy to let lenders widen landlord options
7 months ago | 9 comments
4 months ago | 23 comments
1 year ago | 17 comments
Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 1628
8:54 AM, 24th June 2026, About 15 hours ago
I have this covered. I will never let a property to tenants again. I’d sooner allow my family move in and live rent-free in 3 and 4 bed properties even if they have no children.
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2241 - Articles: 2
9:48 AM, 24th June 2026, About 14 hours ago
All my prospective tenants are professionally referenced. I have never had a benefit tenant pass, or get anywhere near a pass.
Member Since October 2017 - Comments: 110
10:12 AM, 24th June 2026, About 14 hours ago
They are bringing in new data collection for the PRS so they can assess the impact of the RRA. But they haven’t collected the data from prior to the RRA, so how can they assess the impact?
Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 292
10:17 AM, 24th June 2026, About 14 hours ago
Don’t these ministers love gaslighting tenants. Reality would suggest the biggest obstacle to those on benefits is frozen LHA meaning they can’t compete with workers on above inflation pay rises
Member Since October 2023 - Comments: 225
10:28 AM, 24th June 2026, About 14 hours ago
I rented to a guy, who had most of his rent paid direct to me (low income support), and he paid me the rest.
Then one day, I got a letter from the DHS saying I owed them £3500
I asked them why, and they said because they had been over paying his rent benefit. He had been working more hours than he told them. So they were changing his benefit, and backdating it.
So I asked the tenant to pay me the shortfall.
But he was already broke (that’s why he was on benefits) and couldn’t pay me.
I had to pay it.
A perfect example of why it sucks to take people on benefits.
Member Since June 2015 - Comments: 340
10:32 AM, 24th June 2026, About 14 hours ago
I have several tenants who receive UC top ups. As long as they are working and have children their incomes are usually ample.
Single childless claimant’s are incredibly short of money, so can only afford to rent properties that are significantly below market rent. If the property was incredibly cheap to buy and the tenant is hassle free it can work. However, there aren’t many incredibly cheap properties to buy and conveyancing, SDLT, lease extension and refurb costs add significantly to the set up costs. Also we don’t know the hassle factor of someone until after they move in.
Realistically the LHA needs to realign with 30th percentile rents for the system to have a chance of working. Very few landlords understand exactly how UC works, what disregards exist and what extra discounts and freebies go hand in hand with a UC entitlement.
I ran one of my single parent tenants through a benefit calculator a few days ago, just out of curiosity. She receives wages (over £400 per month is completely disregarded), rent from her eldest son (completely ignored), child support (completely ignored), Child Benefit for 2 children, UC top up, small Council tax contribution. In total she has an income of over £4000 per month plus discounts and freebies. Her rent is less than £1300. Even if she was paying market rent of £1600 she would still clear affordability referencing if all income sources were taken into account.
Member Since October 2019 - Comments: 417
10:33 AM, 24th June 2026, About 14 hours ago
It’ll be the firing squad next and we’ll have to pay for the bullets!
Member Since October 2023 - Comments: 225
10:37 AM, 24th June 2026, About 13 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Jo Westlake at 24/06/2026 – 10:32
You just highlighted the problem with the whole benefit system. Your tenant has an income of £4000 a month, and yet she is on benefits!!!!!!
Disgusting.
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2241 - Articles: 2
10:46 AM, 24th June 2026, About 13 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by Jo Westlake at 24/06/2026 – 10:32
I would then check her credit rating. Benefit tenants rarely have a good credit score, in my experience never an even moderate score. Also check CCJs, even a satisfied CCJ will deter me.
Member Since June 2015 - Comments: 340
11:07 AM, 24th June 2026, About 13 hours ago
Reply to the comment left by The_Maluka at 24/06/2026 – 10:46
Why would I? She’s been a perfectly good tenant since 2009.
Also I would need her consent to perform a credit search.