Government issues examples of rent in advance breaches under new rules

Government issues examples of rent in advance breaches under new rules

Landlord holding house keys and cash outside a UK rental property with a To Let sign
8:02 AM, 12th May 2026, 2 days ago 29

The government has published guidance for councils on when it is illegal for a landlord or letting agent to ask for rent in advance.

Under the Renters’ Rights Act, landlords and agents can no longer accept large amounts of rent in advance.

As previously reported on Property118, landlords can only accept rent in advance in certain circumstances, such as when the property is let by the council to a tenant who is legally homeless.

Landlords could face fines of up to £7,000 if they request rent in advance, as councils will have the power to take action against those who ask for payments before a tenancy agreement has been signed.

Councils can take enforcement action

In the guidance, the government says local authorities can take enforcement action and issue a civil penalty against a landlord or letting agent if the breach was committed with their consent or knowledge, or due to their neglect.

Under the Renters’ Rights Act, councils have the power to carry out surprise inspections, including entering premises where tenancy records are kept.

Councils say if a tenant has reported a landlord or agent for asking, inviting or encouraging them to pay rent in advance, they should provide:

  • records or evidence of payment of rent in advance
  • records or evidence of encouraging and accepting rent in advance such as text messages, voicemails, or emails

When defending themselves, landlords or anyone acting on their behalf should provide all relevant documentation, including:

  • a copy of the tenancy agreement
  • records of payments from the tenant
  • steps to repay a payment of rent before it is due
  • records or evidence of communication with the person

Examples of breaches

The government has also published a series of example breaches showing how landlords could fall foul of the new rules.

In the first example, the government outlines a situation where a landlord requires rent to be paid before the tenancy has officially been entered into.

The guidance says: “A tenant has viewed a property and would like to proceed with the tenancy. On payment of the tenant’s holding deposit, the landlord asks them to pay the first month’s rent and tenancy deposit at the same time as the tenant signs the tenancy. The landlord and tenant agree that the landlord will sign the tenancy once the tenant’s funds have cleared into the landlord’s account.

“This would be a breach of the rules on rent in advance as the landlord has required the tenant to pay rent before the tenancy has been entered into by both parties.”

The government also provided an example involving a landlord accepting an offer of rent in advance before the tenancy agreement is signed.

The guidance explains: “A tenant has viewed a property and would like to proceed with the tenancy. As the tenant wants to move quickly, they offer to pay six months’ rent in advance now to secure the property and enter into a contract. The landlord accepts this offer and once the payment of rent is received arranges for both parties to sign the tenancy agreement and for the tenant to move in.

“This would be a breach of the rules on rent in advance as the landlord has accepted an offer of rent before the tenancy is entered into.”

Another example covers landlords demanding rent earlier than the agreed payment date during an active tenancy.

The guidance says: “During a tenancy, a landlord requires the tenant to pay the rent before the day it is due and points to clauses in the tenancy agreement that allow this.

“This would be a breach as the landlord cannot require payment of rent before the payment date agreed in the tenancy agreement. Clauses of the tenancy agreement that allow the landlord to ask for payment early are of no effect and the tenant does not need to comply with this requirement.”

Scenarios that would not be considered breaches

The government has also provided examples of scenarios that would not be considered breaches of the rules.

One example involves a local housing authority paying rent in advance as part of its homelessness duties.

The government explains: “A local housing authority agrees with the landlord to pay rent in advance, to let to someone who is subject to a homelessness duty. They agree to pay two months’ rent in advance before the person signs the tenancy agreement and to pay an additional lump sum of rent every six months. The landlord accepts this and adds this to the tenancy agreement.

“This is not a breach of the rules on rent in advance. First, a local authority is not a ‘relevant person’ under the Tenant Fees Act 2019 and can make payments of rent before the tenancy agreement is signed. Second, this tenancy was agreed to meet the local authority’s homelessness duty. This type of tenancy is exempt from the rules on rent in advance once a tenancy has started, so the landlord can require the agreed regular lump sum every six months.”

The government also outlined an example where a tenant voluntarily offers to pay rent before it is due.

The guidance says: “During a tenancy, the tenant offers to pay the landlord the next two months’ rent in advance. The landlord agrees to this and accepts the payment.

“This would not be a breach as the tenant is free to pay rent before it is due, and a landlord can accept this.”


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 37

    10:45 AM, 12th May 2026, About 1 day ago

    This is the one that I fear re rent up front.
    The guidance explains: “A tenant has viewed a property and would like to proceed with the tenancy. As the tenant wants to move quickly, they offer to pay six months’ rent in advance now to secure the property and enter into a contract. The landlord accepts this offer and once the payment of rent is received arranges for both parties to sign the tenancy agreement and for the tenant to move in.

    “This would be a breach of the rules on rent in advance as the landlord has accepted an offer of rent before the tenancy is entered into.”
    The tenant can offer 6 months rent up front. THEN change their minds after the LL has signed the agreement. Scammers will be all over this one.

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2059

    10:56 AM, 12th May 2026, About 1 day ago

    Reply to the comment left by Paul at 12/05/2026 – 10:45
    If the landlord doesn’t accept the offer of rent up front, even if the tenant has offered it, the landlord won’t have breached the rules.

    However, older retired renters sometimes fail credit referencing, even though they have cash. One way around this problem for them previously was to offer and pay rent upfront. That would now be illegal.

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 2011 - Articles: 21

    11:01 AM, 12th May 2026, About 1 day ago

    Reply to the comment left by Paul at 12/05/2026 – 10:45
    Hi Paul
    “Scammers will be all over this one.” I agree that this is a daft rule that will prevent some tenants from being accepted. However, landlords need to keep up to date with changes in the law. If any landlord in this country has not heard of the Renters’ Rights Act, they probably are ignorant of a dozen other essentials.

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 2059

    11:46 AM, 12th May 2026, About 1 day ago

    Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 12/05/2026 – 11:01
    I’m struggling a bit with reconciling banning rent in advance with this bit in the article:

    The guidance says: “During a tenancy, the tenant OFFERS to pay the landlord the next two months’ rent in advance. The landlord agrees to this and accepts the payment….This would not be a breach as the tenant is free to pay rent before it is due, and a landlord can accept this.”

    So what would a retired couple with assets but low income, or any tenant who struggled with credit referencing in the same position, have to do to get around this rule, given that the tenant is free to pay rent before it is due but the landlord cannot accept rent in advance?

  • Member Since August 2022 - Comments: 103

    12:19 PM, 12th May 2026, About 1 day ago

    My understanding is that the tenant can OFFER it, but the landlord cannot ASK for it. It’s a very fine line and open to fines.
    Given that the whole purpose of the RRA is to extract ridiculous and disproportionate fines from landlords, we are not going to run any risks with this one.
    Everyone now moves in on 1st of the calendar month – no pro-rated part month’s rent, no rent in advance, no preferred move-in dates.

    Classic case of “Wasn’t broken, didn’t need fixing”. But not listening to anybody (especially people who know their stuff) is the hallmark of this government.

  • Member Since September 2024 - Comments: 104

    12:27 PM, 12th May 2026, About 1 day ago

    Thus will only further reduce the properties available ro rent by people unable to provide a home-owning guarantor, thereby increasing the rent payable by these people.
    We took the decision a number of years ago only to rent to people with a home-owning guarantor and, since this wasn’t made illegal by the act, any landlord entering into a tenancy without one (and any landlord who didn’t issue a Section 21 to any tenant without one) will have no reason to come moaning on this forum in future.
    Refusing to allow a payment to clear is ludicrous. IMO a tenant hasn’t “paid” until the money has been received. Before then they’ve simply sent some money somewhere.

  • Member Since December 2023 - Comments: 37

    12:29 PM, 12th May 2026, About 1 day ago

    Reply to the comment left by Markella Mikkelsen at 12/05/2026 – 12:19
    The devil is in the detail here Markella. LL can only accept additional / lump sum payments AFTER the agreement has been signed. If LL accepts the payment before or at the time of signature on documents, its a breach. To be clear. LL can NOT confirm money has been paid before he signs documents. He can only do it AFTER they are committed to hand over the keys. This is likely to catch LLs out.

  • Member Since September 2024 - Comments: 104

    12:30 PM, 12th May 2026, About 1 day ago

    Reply to the comment left by Markella Mikkelsen at 12/05/2026 – 12:19
    That was my impression, but that isn’t what is stated in these examples:
    “The government also provided an example involving a landlord accepting an offer of rent in advance before the tenancy agreement is signed.”

  • Member Since September 2024 - Comments: 104

    12:34 PM, 12th May 2026, About 1 day ago

    Reply to the comment left by Paul at 12/05/2026 – 12:29
    Once the tenant has a signed contract, and the keys, where is the incentive for them to actually pay the lump sum (or indeed any rent at all)?

  • Member Since August 2022 - Comments: 103

    12:37 PM, 12th May 2026, About 1 day ago

    Reply to the comment left by Paul at 12/05/2026 – 12:29
    Thanks for that clarification, Paul, and critical to understand this.
    According to NRLA, the deposit payment does not count as “taking rent in advance”. So we can at least wait for the dposit to clear before issuing the APT.

    Ludicrous – in no other business transaction would you hand over a valuable asset before the funds have cleared.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles