5 months ago | 14 comments
The government has published new guidance on deposits when giving notice to tenants.
The latest clarification comes as the Renters’ Rights Act comes into force on 1 May 2026.
The government says landlords must place a tenant’s deposit in a government-approved tenancy deposit scheme such as the Deposit Protection Service (DPS), MyDeposits or the Tenancy Deposit Scheme (TDS).
Under its clarification, the government says that to use most possession grounds landlords must show that the tenant’s deposit was protected in a government-approved scheme and that they complied with the scheme’s requirements when the deposit was received.
They must also have provided the tenant with the required information about the deposit protection scheme, known as “prescribed information”.
The guidance adds that a court will only grant landlords a possession order to evict a tenant if deposit requirements have been met.
Landlords must have placed the deposit in a government-approved tenancy deposit scheme, complied with the scheme’s requirements and given the tenant the correct information.
A possession order can also be granted if the landlord has returned the deposit to the tenant, either in full or with any deductions agreed with the tenant. It may also proceed if the tenant challenged the landlord through the court over whether deposit protection requirements were met and the case has since been decided, settled or withdrawn.
However, these rules do not apply to grounds 7A or 14 for antisocial behaviour.
More information on the clarifications can be viewed here.
The news comes as the government announced last month what details must be included in tenancy agreements.
The information could be subject to change, with the final version expected in March, but is unlikely to change much before the Renters’ Rights Act comes into force on 1 May.
The government has also confirmed that existing tenancies already in writing will not need to provide a new tenancy agreement, but will be expected to provide a separate information sheet to tenants outlining the changes in the Act or face fines.
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Government claim blanket guarantor requirements could hinder tenantsNext Article
Regulation changes drive longer tenancies
5 months ago | 14 comments
5 months ago | 24 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since June 2022 - Comments: 41
9:46 AM, 11th February 2026, About 2 months ago
This has been the case for some years so why they saying it is NEW?
Member Since May 2015 - Comments: 2197 - Articles: 2
11:04 AM, 11th February 2026, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Sheralyne Stamp at 11/02/2026 – 09:46
Perhaps the fines are larger?
Member Since September 2025 - Comments: 28
11:31 AM, 11th February 2026, About 2 months ago
Reply to the comment left by The_Maluka at 11/02/2026 – 11:04
Probably
Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 776
11:34 AM, 11th February 2026, About 2 months ago
Surely that shouldn’t be the case for ground 1 either if they exclude ASB.