6 months ago | 7 comments
Landlords are losing thousands of pounds as county court bailiff backlogs stretch eviction timescales to unprecedented lengths, research reveals.
The High Court Enforcement Officers Association (HCEOA) says that landlords face average losses of £12,708 in England and Wales when attempting to repossess properties through legal channels.
But that figure soars to £19,223 in the capital, where waiting times have ballooned to eight months.
However, the situation is deteriorating as at least one county court says that bailiffs will no longer apply reasonable force during evictions, instead recommending High Court alternatives.
Alan J Smith, the chair of the HCEOA, said: “Our research highlights months of needless enforcement delays in the county court bailiff system in London in particular, along with what seems to be a new policy that county court bailiffs can no longer use reasonable force to evict someone where it is necessary.
“This is threatening to derail the rental sector and hamper economic growth whilst costing social housing providers and landlords tens of thousands of pounds.”
The report by HCEOA and its partners including the NRLA, Propertymark and Landlord Action, examines enforcement experiences across England and Wales.
It found widespread problems affecting everyone from individual landlords to local authorities.
One potential solution is to transfer possession orders to High Court enforcement officers which could slash waiting times dramatically.
Evictions could be arranged within one month of receiving a writ.
For London landlords, this route could save approximately £12,120 per property using average calculations.
However, District Judges approve only 30% of transfer applications in the capital, creating a bureaucratic bottleneck.
The HCEOA has outlined a two-stage solution requiring no public expenditure.
Firstly, engaging with District Judges to ensure transfer approvals when county court backlogs exceed three months or reasonable force might prove necessary.
Secondly, streamlining the transfer application process to reduce administrative burdens.
Mike Jackson, the vice-chair of HCEOA, said: “These changes can be delivered today at no cost to Government, the judiciary, tenants or debtors.
“They would save landlords who already have a court judgment in their favour thousands of pounds, prevent them from exiting the rental market and stop them from becoming debtors of the future.”
The organisation also says that tenant protections would remain intact under this approach, as transfers occur only after judicial rulings.
High Court enforcement officers operate under identical regulations to county court bailiffs, with claimants rather than tenants covering associated costs.
London emerges as the nation’s worst-affected region, with satisfaction ratings averaging just two out of 10 for county court processes.
Some cases now exceed 12 months from the possession order to actual eviction.
Ben Beadle, the NRLA’s chief executive, said: “Wait times within the court system have reached record levels, ensuring that landlords are unable to take back possession of rental properties in the event tenants display anti-social behaviour or enter extreme rent arrears.”
He added: “To address this issue, the government must implement the key recommendations set out in the report, namely by taking the necessary steps to allow cases to be ‘transferred up’ to the High Court, enabling more effective enforcement of eviction orders across the private rented sector.
“By adopting this proposal, the government can stop landlords from having to experience even more disruption when dealing with the court system.”
Timothy Douglas, Propertymark’s head of policy and campaigns, said: “This report lays bare what property agents have long known: that the county court system in England and Wales takes too long; is too expensive; and delays access to justice for landlords, tenants and agents.
“As significant changes take place for the private rented sector in England, and we reflect on the recently implemented changes in Wales, it is vital that the UK government make use of existing levers and oil the wheels of the current system.
“Simplifying the process and ensuring transfer up requests are granted under clearly defined circumstances would allow a greater use of High Court enforcement officers, which can provide a more timely and inexpensive resolution for landlords, tenants and agents.”
Paul Shamplina, the founder of Landlord Action, said: “We see the real-life consequences of these delays every day at Landlord Action.
“One landlord who applied for a bailiff back in February is still waiting, left in limbo.
“He urgently needs possession of his only property so he can move in himself. Tenants are also trapped.”
He added: “Landlords cannot be expected to prop up a system that is broken, both in terms of housing supply and the courts.
“That is why allowing more cases to be enforced by the High Court, under the same rules and protections for tenants, is vital.
“It’s not about giving landlords an advantage, but rather about making the system work fairly and efficiently for everyone.”
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Tenant tampering with metering safety?
6 months ago | 7 comments
6 months ago | 35 comments
Sorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1630 - Articles: 3
10:25 AM, 8th October 2025, About 6 months ago
If ‘reasonable force’ is legally available to County Court Bailiffs, why won’t they now use it?
We can see why the government dismissed the need for the court system to be fit for purpose before enacting the RRB. It’s simply not possible!
Reason enough to push yet more landlords towards the door, and deter new entrants from investing in BTL.
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 1996 - Articles: 21
11:08 AM, 8th October 2025, About 6 months ago
For many in the Labour Party and pretty well all of the Greens “needless enforcement delays” aren’t a problem but a benefit. Sponging off landlords is fine by them but woe betide the landlord who steps a millimetre out of line. He or she will be punished severely. Welcome to life in a Socialist ghetto.
Member Since January 2015 - Comments: 49
3:18 PM, 8th October 2025, About 6 months ago
I blame the court system and it’s inherent bias towards tenants and against landlords.
The tenant lies about absolutely everything to the extent of damage to the property, alleging it is damp, whilst refusing to open windows, peeling off wallpaper etc.
The government allowed this situation to exist by refusing to allow evictions during COVID and afterwards. The prevailing thought from tenants was that they didn’t have pay rent since they couldn’t be evicted. As a consequence arrears mounted up to perhaps £30k.
Eventually evicted, these same honourable tenants use every lie to avoid payment.
The courts!! Simply lose files, create situations where they can strike out the cases of the landlord.
Bring back the days when the landlord who provided housing, was treated with respect rather than these socialist courts.
By the way, no rental properties now, sleep well at night, rather better than former tenants who find they have no where to live.
BTW, told by a former tenant that as a baby boomer it is all our fault. Can’t make this up….
Member Since November 2018 - Comments: 48
4:22 PM, 8th October 2025, About 6 months ago
1,611 homeless people died in 2024 (BBC article today), 74 of them were children, 58 of which were babies under 1. These are shocking figures, at what point do we get classed as a third world country?
When will our successive Government’s admit responsibility for these deaths? In every case I read about these poor people are being made homeless due to their landlords selling up. Landlords are selling up due to Government policy and regulation, which constantly increase the costs on Landlords. The more our successive Government’s burden Landlords with these costs, the more Landlords are selling, because no business can afford to subsides other people’s housing needs.
This article states that “landlords face average losses of £12,708 in England and Wales when attempting to repossess properties through legal channels”. The harder it gets for the PRS to exist, including increasing the time and cost it takes to evict people and the constant barrage of cost upon cost, the more the sector will shrink.
I will never understand why the Government or media are unable, or maybe unwilling, to put two and two together. How many more deaths? How many more landlords forced out of business?
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1630 - Articles: 3
4:36 PM, 8th October 2025, About 6 months ago
The answer from Labour… ‘we do not recognise those figures…’
Member Since September 2022 - Comments: 55
10:00 PM, 8th October 2025, About 6 months ago
Don’t rely on courts. I see so many saying section 8 will allow you to get your property back. The standard of judges nowadays put migrants before British citizens. They will put tenant before landlord. Far too risky.
Member Since October 2013 - Comments: 1630 - Articles: 3
10:48 PM, 8th October 2025, About 6 months ago
Reply to the comment left by Darren Sullivan at 08/10/2025 – 22:00
My S8 took 15 months before I could evict. I despair about the future for landlords trying to get their properties back under the RRB.