Council plans tougher fines for landlords housing vulnerable tenants

Council plans tougher fines for landlords housing vulnerable tenants

Illustration of vulnerable tenants facing financial strain amid rising landlord fines in Bristol
8:33 AM, 27th February 2026, 1 month ago 6

A council has been accused of setting a “worrying precedent” over plans to propose large fines for rule-breaking landlords housing vulnerable tenants, a story in The Telegraph claims.

Bristol City Council has proposed in a consultation that landlords who breach safety standards when housing vulnerable tenants would face a 20% premium added to the financial penalty, meaning landlords would be forced to pay £14,400.

Bristol City Council told Property118 it wants to hear from landlords and agents as part of the consultation and is encouraging them to make their voices heard.

The news comes after the Green-controlled council consultation is also asking renters to help decide how much it will fine landlords who breach rules under the Renters’ Rights Act.

Endless escalation of fines

According to The Telegraph, the council claims the definition of a vulnerable tenant will be non-exhaustive and will include young adults and children, people with drug or alcohol addictions, those whose first language is not English, asylum seekers, and people on a low income.

The council also plans to fine landlords an additional 10% if they charge rent above the level set by the Local Housing Allowance (LHA).

The Telegraph reports that under the council’s plans, a landlord who failed to fix a roof causing damp and mould by a specified deadline would face a £13,000 penalty. However, if they charged tenants above LHA rates, they would be required to pay £14,300.

However, industry experts have warned the council’s plans could create chaos for landlords and cause a lack of supply.

Paul Shamplina, founder of Landlord Action, told The Telegraph: “Landlords must comply with safety and licensing laws, but the penalty premium would create an endless escalation of fines.

“Measures like this could further reduce the supply of landlords willing to accommodate vulnerable tenants, particularly in cities such as Bristol, where homelessness levels are already high and social housing is in short supply. It sets a worrying precedent.”

Criminalise landlords unnecessarily

Sean Hooker, of dispute adjudicator Property Redress, said fining landlords was not the answer.

He told The Telegraph: “If penalties are seen as excessive, we are likely to see more appeals, leading to delay and additional cost for enforcement bodies.

“The purpose of these powers is to raise standards and ensure compliance, not to criminalise landlords unnecessarily.

“In many cases, working with a landlord and encouraging investment to upgrade a property will deliver a better outcome for tenants than simply imposing the maximum fine.”

Under the Renters’ Rights Act, councils now have the power to carry out surprise inspections, including entering premises where tenancy records are kept with or without a warrant.

Councils can also compel landlords, letting agents, and third parties (e.g., prop tech companies, banks, accountants, contractors) to provide documents and information related to housing compliance.

Councils will also be able to issue fines of up to £40,000, and the government has released new civil penalty tables. These include a £12,000 fine for operating a property in a selective licensing area without the correct licence.

Carefully reviewing all resident feedback

When contacted by Property118, Bristol City Council said the consultation policy is based on national guidance, and that other local authorities across England will be adopting their own policies to enable them to use these powers.

It said that if a civil penalty is served, the landlord has the right to make representations. If a final penalty is issued following consideration of those representations, the landlord also has the right to appeal the decision to the First-tier Tribunal.

Councillor Barry Parsons, chair of the homes and housing delivery committee, said: “We are currently consulting on a broad set of proposals to help shape our new civil penalty policy for private housing related offences and breaches. These proposals take into account the statutory guidance set by central government that all councils must follow.

“Once the consultation closes, we will carefully review all resident feedback to inform our next steps. We want to hear from a range of voices on this issue, and so we encourage all to take part in the consultation and share their views on the full set of proposals, in particular Landlords Agents and Renters’ and the groups that represent them.”


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since June 2019 - Comments: 761

    9:05 AM, 27th February 2026, About 1 month ago

    So with many vulnerable tenants already at risk of never being housed by the PRS it is obviously correct to make the PRS even less likely to take them – well done that Green Party.

  • Member Since March 2024 - Comments: 281

    1:04 PM, 27th February 2026, About 1 month ago

    The Greens have already announced their intention to abolish private landlords. Looks like it will be happening first for ‘vulnerable’ tenants in Bristol..

  • Member Since May 2021 - Comments: 389

    7:15 PM, 27th February 2026, About 1 month ago

    CoCs, Councils on Cannabis, well Greens do want it legalised.

  • Member Since May 2020 - Comments: 38

    10:26 PM, 27th February 2026, About 1 month ago

    I love the way that councils seem to be able to act like mafia making up random licencing, fines etc on a whim. They are public servants. Landlords should start charging council admin fees for any hassle caused by them.

  • Member Since January 2023 - Comments: 8

    10:03 AM, 28th February 2026, About 1 month ago

    Lol you couldn’t make it up. If I was asked to design a system that locks vulnerable people out of the PRS. This is what i would do.

  • Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 357

    11:35 AM, 28th February 2026, About 1 month ago

    Amazing giving the massive amounts about the state of many council and housing association houses..
    These penalties are shocking £10 to £40000 given not by a court but someone at a council.
    Here’s the truth I can sell take my money any put it elsewhere and live a comfortable life.
    I don’t have to keep renting to families or people the council can’t .
    I bet the housing problem is going to get a whole lot worse.
    .I have three properties which I am ashamed of given to tenants in good condition but now need a huge amount of work.
    Council came after me on one saying I needed to sort . I send back original pictures plus new ones showing 57 dog or cat poos lying around on concrete floor . All doors removed flooring .
    Yet when I tried to evict the council did everything to prevent the eviction.

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles