3 years ago | 36 comments
Hello, our situation we have had a tenant in place at one of our properties for around 5 years – never increased the rent (single mum – two kids – you try not to make people’s lives harder than they need to be) – always done repairs – always acted as a model landlord.
The time has come to sell up (you all know why!) – so we served the necessary docs with a leave date of 15 Sep 23.
Today the tenant has informed me that the council have told her that the tenancy doesn’t end if she refuses to leave – but only ends if a bailiff evicts her. They have told her to stay in the property, and that if she leaves (per the S21 notice) she will be making herself voluntarily homeless and then they won’t help her.
Is this normal? This feels like incorrect and very bad advice for the tenant. The council is effectively forcing us to go through the courts to evict the tenant, adding costs and bunging up the court system, and ensuring that the tenant will get a poor reference. We will be asking for a possession order with costs – so they are also potentially making the tenant worse off!
Is the council’s behaviour in this regard even legal – Thoughts (and rants!) welcome and appreciated!
For info we have been landlords for 16 years – and never had to evict anyone yet – just one S21 10 years ago! BTW my blood is boiling on this one – the council I give £400 per month to in council tax are actively working against me – when I have housed someone for less than market rate for many years!!!
Thanks,
Christopher
Editors Note: You can find Property118s investigation on whether councils are acting illegally when telling tenants to stay put here
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Previous Article
Gas shortage supplies this winter?Next Article
August sees rents remaining red hotSorry. You must be logged in to view this form.
Member Since June 2023 - Comments: 188
8:01 PM, 1st October 2023, About 3 years ago
Wasn’t £462 mixed it up, its £426 with solicitors fees, added to court charge
It’s a whole lot more if you have a Court Costs clause in your contract
Member Since April 2015 - Comments: 468
10:26 PM, 1st October 2023, About 3 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Russell Cartner at 01/10/2023 – 20:01
I did not realise that one can have a “Costs Recovery Clause” in the tenancy agreement as I would have thought that the Tenant Fee Ban would preclude this.
Member Since June 2023 - Comments: 188
10:31 PM, 1st October 2023, About 3 years ago
Look it up you will find you can and should have one
Member Since April 2015 - Comments: 468
11:19 PM, 1st October 2023, About 3 years ago
Reply to the comment left by Russell Cartner at 01/10/2023 – 22:31
Do you have a link to this as it would be useful as I also was wondering if a tenant could be charged for things like call out charges for appointments arranged and the tenant not being available.
I was under the impression that the Tenant Fee Ban prevented a landlord from making such charges.
Member Since June 2023 - Comments: 188
12:10 AM, 2nd October 2023, About 3 years ago
Just google it