How does a Company Landlord sign an AST?

How does a Company Landlord sign an AST?

9:16 AM, 2nd June 2016, About 8 years ago 19

Text Size

Twice now I have had a judge question how I have signed an AST on behalf of my company.signature

What is the correct way please?

Many thanks

Steve


Share This Article


Comments

Steve Masters

15:06 PM, 6th June 2016, About 8 years ago

So, is the NLA generated AST right or wrong, see example below:-

eg at the top
LANDLORD(S): my name
COMPANY: my company
TENANT(S): my tenant

and at the bottom
THE LANDLORD: my name, my company
LANDLORD’S SIGNATURE: my signature

In my experience the NLA AST is unsafe and I am trying to get them to amend their forms generator.

Paul Franklin

15:12 PM, 6th June 2016, About 8 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Steve Masters" at "06/06/2016 - 15:06":

I can't say I deal with this often Steve so I don't know for sure, but if your company owns the property, isn't the company the landlord - not you? You are a director who can sign documents on behalf of the company but you are not the owner and landlord of the property - your company is. At least that's my understanding.

Steve Masters

15:23 PM, 6th June 2016, About 8 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Paul Franklin" at "06/06/2016 - 15:12":

Your right Paul, the company is the owner and should therefor be the landlord, and the judges agree too, but they say this is not reflected in the way the AST has been generated by the NLA saying it gives the impression that I am the landlord.

I have spoken to the NLA and they can't see the problem. I would like to try and persuade them to make changes to their generated AST to make it clear to any judge exactly who is the landlord and who is signing when a company owns the property.

Paul Franklin

15:46 PM, 6th June 2016, About 8 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Steve Masters" at "06/06/2016 - 15:23":

I agree that the if the NLA document has been produced for a company let it appears to be at best unclear but is more likely simply wrong.

Romain Garcin

16:06 PM, 6th June 2016, About 8 years ago

If the document is intended to be used when the landlord is a company then filling any other name under 'landlord' is incorrect and therefore so is the way the document is drafted with different fields for 'landlord' and 'company'.

Paul Franklin

16:42 PM, 6th June 2016, About 8 years ago

Also note that if tenancy deposit protection certificates and such like are incorrectly signed as per company requirements you may also be in breach of deposit protection prescribed information requirements which could also invalidate a s.21. There has been a recent case regarding this: Bali v Manaquel Company Limited.

Steve Masters

17:08 PM, 6th June 2016, About 8 years ago

Yes Paul, that is exactly the sort of reason why the NLA should be generating their ASTs and we should be filling out our ASTs correctly and beyond question!

Steve Masters

18:16 PM, 6th June 2016, About 8 years ago

Reply to the comment left by "Paul Franklin" at "06/06/2016 - 16:42":

And this is exactly the sort of reason why I no longer take deposits!!

Simon Lever - Chartered Accountant helping clients get the best returns from their properties

15:02 PM, 18th June 2016, About 8 years ago

All of the above would work.

However for the avoidance of doubt I would suggest that when signing as director you put the following below the signature:

"Mr(s) A Name
Director
for and on behalf of ABC Ltd"

Should be totally clear why you have signed it then.

Leave Comments

In order to post comments you will need to Sign In or Sign Up for a FREE Membership

or

Don't have an account? Sign Up

Landlord Tax Planning Book Now