1 year ago | 6 comments
Charities urge Labour to tackle ‘discriminatory’ PRS guarantor rules
The Labour government is being urged to overhaul renter legislation which 28 charities say will hit poorer tenants from being able to access PRS housing.
The charities have written an open letter to the Housing Secretary Angela Rayner with their concerns over the Renters’ Rights Bill.
They include Shelter, Generation Rent, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) and the renters’ union Acorn.
The Bill is currently under scrutiny in the House of Lords and the charities caution that without amendments, private landlords might increasingly demand guarantors.
They warn that excessive guarantor demands will enable landlords to unfairly exclude tenants deemed ‘undesirable’.
Right to refuse to rent
Among the Bill’s aims is to deny landlords the right to refuse to rent to families with children, tenants with pets and renters on benefits.
However, campaigners argue that unchecked guarantor stipulations could serve as a loophole so landlords could bypass the new rules.
Shelter’s research shows that in recent years one in five renters face the guarantor requirement, which is around 600,000 people, and they would struggle to find a guarantor should the landlord demand one.
That would effectively bar them from securing a rented home, the campaigners say.
Guarantor demands could escalate
The letter has been coordinated by the Renters’ Reform Coalition who warn that without tighter controls, guarantor demands could escalate.
This would become an issue after the legislation is in force.
The letter notes: “Landlords will simply switch to further abusing their power to request a guarantor, even when there is very little danger that a tenant will not pay rent.”
The coalition says it doesn’t want to abolish guarantors outright but urges Labour to ban such requests when a tenant’s earnings cover the rent or if the landlord hold insurance against payment defaults.
They also want to cap a guarantor’s liability at six months’ rent.
Struggle to find guarantors
The letter’s signatories warn that tenants with modest incomes or on benefits often lack connections to wealthy homeowners willing to back their tenancy.
This, they argue, entrenches inequality, leaving vulnerable renters at a disadvantage.
Dan Wilson Craw, the deputy chief executive of Generation Rent, said: “Everyone needs a safe, secure and affordable home.
“Unfortunately, many tenants face discrimination from landlords when searching for a place to live.
“Even if you can afford the rent, if you’re self-employed or relying on benefits, landlords can demand multiple months’ rent upfront, or that you get a homeowner to guarantee your rent.”
He welcomed Labour’s plan to curb advance rent demands but stressed the need to address excessive guarantor conditions.
Block guarantor requirements
Previously, Leeds Central and Headingley MP Alex Sobel tabled an amendment to block guarantor requirements for tenants passing affordability tests, though it didn’t reach a vote.
Housing Minister Matthew Pennycook acknowledged the issue’s complexity, and in that debate said: “I appreciate fully that obtaining a guarantor can be difficult for some prospective tenants, and I understand the reasoning behind his amendment.”
He noted that guarantors can sometimes help tenants access properties but said the matter remains ‘under review’ for future debate.
A spokesperson from the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government said: “We have no plans to restrict the use of guarantors, but we are clear landlords should not discriminate against any prospective tenants and consider them on a case-by-case basis.”
Comments
Have Your Say
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
Related Articles
1 year ago | 11 comments
1 year ago | 63 comments
Member Since May 2023 - Comments: 225
12:07 PM, 19th March 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Julian Lloyd at 18/03/2025 – 12:31
Indeed. So much entitlement delusion that PRS is a public service, yet dissonance that evil landlords must be regulated and taxed to make it a high risk and pointless endeavour.
Charitable status for Activist organisations is unfair and should be reformed since having opinions is not a public good, which actually providing housing would be. Further opinions without involvement have low credibility, below vain claims of doing any public good. For example the organisations providing not for profit housing are worth listening to and deserve their charitable status. Not the talking heads…
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 1996 - Articles: 21
12:04 PM, 20th March 2025, About 1 year ago
So “Landlords will simply switch to further abusing their power to request a guarantor, even when there is very little danger that a tenant will not pay rent.”
Why should we accept any such risk? Once the RRB becomes law we will have to wait 3 months before commencing action and then perhaps 6 to 12 months to get to court and a further 3 months to get bailiffs to evict a defaulting tenant.
If you cannot get those who know you best to guarantee you, why should I as a landlord accept you?
If Alex Sobel’s nonsense wording became law, it will simply mean that landlords will not rent unless they can obtain rent guarantee insurance. Typical cost for that is about 8% of the annual rent. Those tenants who don’t pass referencing and credit checks won’t be housed by the PRS even if they could provide a guarantor.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5
12:12 PM, 20th March 2025, About 1 year ago
excluded from buying food on affordability grounds.
How is this a supermarkets fault?
excluded from buying a car on affordability grounds.
How is this the manufacturers fault?
excluded from renting on affordability grounds.
How is this the landlords fault?
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5
12:16 PM, 20th March 2025, About 1 year ago
Reply to the comment left by Ian Narbeth at 20/03/2025 – 12:04
agree.
If no guarantor then rent guarantee is needed. This is based on INDEPENDENT assessment of tenant risk. If risk is too high this wont be an option, so then I will need a guarantor..ohh wait..
Next application please.
Member Since September 2018 - Comments: 3508 - Articles: 5
12:23 PM, 20th March 2025, About 1 year ago
excessive guarantor demands will enable landlords to unfairly exclude tenants deemed ‘undesirable’.
What exactly is deemed ‘excessive’ when it comes to risk assessments? The use of a guarantor is ONLY requested if the risk itself is deemed excessive!
Member Since July 2013 - Comments: 154
4:26 PM, 22nd March 2025, About 1 year ago
These ‘tenants’ are surely not the type who should, or even want to, rent within the Private Rented Sector from these parasitic Landlords. They should be on the Council waiting list while the PRS caters for the ‘professional’ tenants. Problem solved.