Summer Budget 2015 – Landlords Reactions
2:00 PM, 8th July 2015, 11 years ago
9619
Categories:
The concern is;
Budget proposals to “restrict finance cost relief to individual landlords”. 
To calculate the impact of this policy on your personal finances download this software
Tags:
Budget 2015 Campaign
Comments
Have Your Say
Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.
Not a member yet? Join In Seconds
Login with
or
Member Since January 2011 - Comments: 12195 - Articles: 1396
8:26 PM, 27th July 2015, About 11 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “High Yield” at “27/07/2015 – 20:21“:
Links to the HPC forum will be deleted.
.
Member Since September 2016 - Comments: 2533 - Articles: 73
8:27 PM, 27th July 2015, About 11 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “Mark Shine” at “27/07/2015 – 19:32“:
Hi Mark.
Are you sure you didn’t see our petition? As Mark said, could you give us the link?
Thanks.
Member Since September 2016 - Comments: 2533 - Articles: 73
8:45 PM, 27th July 2015, About 11 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “Mark Shine” at “27/07/2015 – 20:21“:
Thanks Mark.
Well spotted. You’re right. The other petition only has 11 signatures, so I think we’re okay for a few days. I’ll see if I can find a way to contact the person who set it up and maybe get him to close it? (unless someone else wants to volunteer to do this? That would be great). That would be the best, as we want our petition to go ahead and we have all come up with wording with which we’re pleased and have a consensus about.
Thanks again. We have to keep our wits about us. It’s been frustrating that the petitions group haven’t yet given us full authorisation – because as soon as we have this we can inform all the large organisations and make sure there is no duplication.
Member Since July 2015 - Comments: 19
8:54 PM, 27th July 2015, About 11 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “Ros .” at “27/07/2015 – 20:45“:
It only had 10 an hour ago, so now it has 11, suspect it is a very recent one?
Member Since July 2015 - Comments: 4
8:58 PM, 27th July 2015, About 11 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “Mark Alexander” at “27/07/2015 – 20:26“:
Hi Mark,
I think your stance here is to be applauded – but I’m sorry for my newbie ignorance – what is the “HPC forum” ? I’m a bit lost here….
Thank you in advance,
High Yield
Member Since January 2011 - Comments: 12195 - Articles: 1396
9:06 PM, 27th July 2015, About 11 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “High Yield” at “27/07/2015 – 20:58“:
Nothing important, don’t worry about it.
.
Member Since January 2011 - Comments: 12195 - Articles: 1396
9:10 PM, 27th July 2015, About 11 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “Mark Shine” at “27/07/2015 – 20:54“:
If it is possible to remove a petition we must consider the possibility it was created maliciously to be removed at a later date.
If we can’t contact the author let’s ignore it and see how well it does.
.
Member Since July 2015 - Comments: 69
9:53 PM, 27th July 2015, About 11 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “Mark Alexander” at “27/07/2015 – 21:34“:
Mark,
You should have guessed that someone with a name of “High Yield” is bound be a wind up merchant. An attention seeking school leaver.
It’s best he is either ignored or on extreme end terminated.
Member Since July 2015 - Comments: 69
10:00 PM, 27th July 2015, About 11 years ago
Mark,
Is it not possible that, members are fully vetted before joining the site? Furthermore contents of this site should not be viewable to anyone as this could potentially undermine our efforts?
Just a though occurred to me.
Member Since July 2015 - Comments: 197 - Articles: 3
10:08 PM, 27th July 2015, About 11 years ago
Reply to the comment left by “ ” at “01/01/1970 – 00:00“:
I don’t understand your reasoning High Yield. The ‘thousand families’ are actually far far fewer in terms of who owns the vast majority of land in the country and some of the large land owners are actually organisations such as Trinity College Cambridge.
Anyway that’s not really my point. What I am arguing is that the current economic situation and thirst for buying property to let, is only a response to demand. It’s the demand that is adding value to these large portfolios and if they want to sell bits and pieces off then they will get far more than if there is a house price crash sparked by the Chancellor’s proposal. I don’t see your logic, though I do believe you are genuinely trying to debate a point.