Association warns extending National Insurance on rental income could trigger landlord exodus

Association warns extending National Insurance on rental income could trigger landlord exodus

Business figures heading toward an exit door, symbolising landlords leaving the rental market.
12:01 AM, 27th October 2025, 5 months ago 5
Categories:

An association warns extending National Insurance on rental income will have serious unintended consequences for small landlords and create a two-tier system.

The Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association (IMLA) warns the rumoured proposal could cause landlords to leave the market and push landlords’ tax rates “to unsuitable levels.”

According to IMLA’s report, The November Budget 2025: Surveying the Options, while extending National Insurance to landlords might raise around £2.2 billion annually, the damage to rental supply, market confidence and tenant affordability would far outweigh the benefit.

A short-sighted and self-defeating move

IMLA say small landlords would take a huge financial hit as incorporated landlords would be exempt creating a two-tier system.

According to IMLA’s report, 58% of higher-rate taxpayers letting properties in their own name would face total tax and National Insurance bills exceeding their entire rental profit and would be paying more than 100% back to the Treasury.

Kate Davies, executive director of IMLA, said: “Extending National Insurance to landlords’ rental income may appear an easy way to raise money, but in practice it would hit exactly the wrong people.

“It would punish smaller, often part-time landlords who provide homes for more than four million UK households, while leaving larger incorporated operators untouched. That is both unfair and economically counterproductive.

“This would be a short-sighted and self-defeating move. Fewer rental homes mean higher rents, less mobility, and more pressure on public housing. At a time when the UK needs more investment in property, not less, this proposal risks driving it away.”

Trigger a landlord exodus

The association warns that imposing National Insurance on rental income could have devastating consequences for the private rented sector, potentially triggering a landlord exodus and driving up rent prices.

According to IMLA, the number of buy-to-let properties has already fallen by more than 110,000 since 2022, and introducing National Insurance would disproportionately affect individual landlords, who make up 81% of the market.

The association added: “At a time when the government is seeking growth and stability, penalising smaller landlords risks undermining both by reducing investment, shrinking housing choice, and putting upward pressure on rents.”


Share This Article

Comments

  • Member Since February 2020 - Comments: 360

    10:57 AM, 27th October 2025, About 5 months ago

    I would rather have a higher tax rate than have section 24. It’s an abomination.

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 1996

    1:09 PM, 27th October 2025, About 5 months ago

    The comment: “At a time when the government is seeking growth and stability, penalising smaller landlords risks undermining both by reducing investment, shrinking housing choice, and putting upward pressure on rents” is 100% correct.

    Many landlords have already been put in a cash-loss situation by section 24. For many of those landlords the only solutions were to (1) incorporate if they could, and if they couldn’t then (2) raise rents, or (3) exit. None of these things does anything positive for tenant choice and stopping a small portfolio landlord from offsetting finance costs against rents when any incorporated company can only distorts the market.

    If the government did decide to apply NI to rental income in the same way that it applies to self-employed income for example, then this would have less of a negative effect if section 24 were to be repealed and landlords were once again able to offset their finance costs against rents.

  • Member Since September 2015 - Comments: 12 - Articles: 4

    3:30 PM, 27th October 2025, About 5 months ago

    This is going to be terrible and tenants wikll end up paying the additional rent to cover it

  • Member Since May 2018 - Comments: 1996

    3:49 PM, 27th October 2025, About 5 months ago

    Reply to the comment left by Simon Misiewicz FCCA, ATT, SWW, MBA at 27/10/2025 – 15:30
    The independent just reported that ADVERTISED rents have just reached a new record high:

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/rent-record-price-average-london-b2852557.html#:~:text=The%20average%20rental%20prices%20being,higher%20than%20a%20year%20ago.

    One of the proposals in the Renters Rights Bill is to stop landlords taking more than the ADVERTISED rent. The effect of this particular bit of labour idiocy is that it will inevitably push up ADVERTISED rents. Pushing up ADVERTISED RENTS in turn will push up MARKET RENTS.

    Levying National Insurance on rental income would also push up market rents because on top of the fact that they are no longer permitted to offset finance costs against rents, putting up the rent is the only way that landlords can recover the extra cash. In effect, this would be a tax levied on tenants by the government; by meddling in the market the government is making things worse for tenants.

  • Member Since April 2024 - Comments: 19

    1:59 AM, 31st October 2025, About 5 months ago

    It’ll be passed to my tenants. Simple

Have Your Say

Every day, landlords who want to influence policy and share real-world experience add their voice here. Your perspective helps keep the debate balanced.

Not a member yet? Join In Seconds


Login with

or

Related Articles